Quote:
Originally Posted by Chargem
I like re-signing Ogbah and Breeland. I also like Robinson.
I would love Schobert, but I'm not sure it makes sense, financially we are stuck with Hitchens still and Wilson has looked good, so I don't really want to see his snaps decrease. Are you just letting Hitchens ride the bench when you only 2 LB on the field?
Based on right now, I would not be comfortable with that WR group. Maybe we see enough from Pringle and Hardman for the rest of this season to be comfortable, but right now I would be hanging on to Watkins.
How would you feel about a stop gap 1 year DT and also drafting one in the first or 2nd to be the future. I don't know who that would make sense to take in that 1 year role, Mike Daniels or maybe Dareus if there's no market for a multi year contract for him? Suh?
I don't know anything about draft prospects at this stage but with a top 10 pick I'd be tempted to trade back for more resources, looking for 4 picks in the top 64 to get a DT, DE, CB and OL.
|
I'm all good with Hitchens riding the pine now, much less next year. He sucks ass. That said, I have him sliding to WLB with Wilson at SLB and Schobert at MLB. In 2 linebacker sets, I'd easily sit Hitchens, contract be damned. Hell, I'm not opposed to cutting him in the offseason even though its basically a break-even. Might not be a bad idea to make him a June 1 cut and bring back Lee.
With the receivers, I'm going to assume Hardman and Pringle are better next year than this year, much like we had happen with Conley and Robinson a couple years ago. Keep adding pieces and rejuvenating the group. Mahomes doesn't need amazing receivers, he needs ones that do what they are supposed to every play. I think by next year, those two guys are doing those things better than right now.
Stop gap DT could work, but you have to bank on developing one quickly and that likely means an early pick. I wouldn't be opposed to it at all. It's a bit what I had in mind last mock. That said, the Chiefs need to get a CB of their own and a LG early IMO, however that may shake out.