Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins
I'd rather have three years of Kawhi or another similar top-tier, healthy guy. Post-30 Klay, Kuzma, and Davis ain't gonna be enough on a team with absolutely no draft assets for years. All the other players they would get would be one-year vet minimums and MLE types. Not enough to fill out a roster w/o a third guy.
For example, while Klay is better than Kemba and D'Angelo Russell, two years of those guys in LeBron's mid-30's is/was worth more than one year of Klay.
|
I was under the impression Kawhi waant going there but yes obviously Kawhi would be the better option. Obviously Kemba is off the market, I think Russell is overrated as is Butler. You would have Bron off the books in a few years with Davis and Thompson that's not horrible by any measure.