|
Not a fan of this style of 'argumentation.'
It kind of borrows from the 'Daily Show' paradigm, where you create a tsunami of tiny soundbites that never really culminate in a coherent argument.
It relies on inference and emotion. You get that a diverse and wide-ranging group of people are upset about something, but it's still left to you to figure out exactly what.
One person saying 'this is a bunch of bullshit' isn't very informative. 100 people saying the same isn't much better.
__________________
We need the kind of courage that can withstand the subtle corruption of the cynics - E.W.
|