|
Owners might choose to eat contracts all the time...but I'm amazed at the entitlement that exists that basically expects them to do so. In the same way I don't concern myself with what the payroll is (not my money), I could care less if an owner wants to eat money or not (again...not my money). His money, his choice. Apparently, he'd rather have the player at the agreed contract. I'm OK with that. It's not like Kennedy has been a worthless player with no advantage for a developing team - I'd rather Keller's games get closed out than watching Zimmer or Staumont or Barlow blow saves for him.
And obviously Glass is willing to eat money...he's OK'd the DFA of multiple players, both in the past and this year....including Owings, Duda, Gore, Peralta and Boxberger - might not amount to the dollars they're spending on Kennedy, but it's simply not the worst thing in the world to keep the player (Kennedy), despite the bad contract.
__________________
|