|
So there is literally nothing that happens that you won't use as a defense of Frank Clark.
That 'chip' from the TE blasted Clark back so hard that the RT had time to completely set in his stance and just destroy him. He's slow off the ball, he lets the TE get into his body (no hand-fighting at all) - by any reasonable analysis that's a completely ineffective snap from Clark.
And you use it as proof that he's awesome. Because he was lined up over the TE. You realize that the TE was set in-line right? And they had no way to know that Clark was gonna be over there? That TE was gonna hit whoever was in front of him. And Clark did nothing to actually keep him out of his body.
Again - this is what I'm talking about. Kindergartners fingerpainting man. Clark did a shit job on that snap and instead it's being used as 'proof' that he must be good because the TE situated on that side of the field just happened to hit the guy in front of him before he went into the pattern.
Dafuq?
__________________
"If there's a god, he's laughing at us.....and our football team..."
"When you look at something through rose colored glasses, all the red flags just look like flags."
|