Quote:
Originally Posted by RunKC
Teams are absolutely game planning against Clark. The Raiders doubled and chipped him nearly every goddamn play. The Ravens ran away from his side most of the time.
Hell one of the Ravens 4th down conversions was designed rolling Lamar Jackson to the right. Why the hell do you think that is? Why would they roll him away from Frank Clark?
But hey he’s the 4th best DL on the team bc Ogbah gets a sack due to the OL forgetting he existed and not laying a single hand on him.
Good ****ing God
|
Because the Ravens run a ton of RPO action and Lamar Jackson is ****ing righthanded. Are you serious with this nonsense? Why would a designed roll be to Lamar Jackson's right? Is that seriously the question you're asking right now? Because even if it's a designed run (which the Ravens rarely do; Jackson will almost always have a pass option in there), you still have an illusion to sell and if you roll Jackson to his left I'd say that illusion is gone, wouldn't you? And again - Marshall Yanda.
Just more attributing an effect to a preferred cause. As you've done over and over and over again. Tell me more about how the in-line TE who hit a guy as he went into the pattern but had no idea that Clark was going to be lined up over him when that play was called was the Ravens 'targeting Clark' again.
And no, the Ravens didn't run away from his side because y'all continue to ignore the fact that Clark moved to the left side of the formation for much of the 2nd half. And the Ravens didn't react to it at all. And again, y'know, Marshall Yanda.
This is basic football stuff that I swear to Christ you knew before it involved Frank Clark. You actually cited a missed Twist as proof of Clark's dominance. How in the actual hell has this guy convinced you to simply stop looking at the play in front of you? These are not demonstrations of Clark's excellence at all.
The 2-point conversion? That was good - go with that. Excellent play.
All the rest of this noise? I'm just dumbfounded by this.