Quote:
Originally Posted by Megatron96
According to most of the pundits, 3 Rings in 10 years is the standard for a team to be called a dynasty. I guess I agree with that.
|
Hmm. 3 championships in 10 years is news to me. I usually hear 3 in 5 and I think I prefer that because I think I’d need the core of the team to be largely the same in order to consider it a dynasty.
For example, what if the Packers had been able to win a Super Bowl with Favre and whoever their coach was in 2002 then they won the Super Bowl again in 2010 and 2011 with Aaron Rodgers and Mike McCarthy? Would that really be considered a dynasty? I don’t think I like that.