Quote:
Originally Posted by BWillie
One of the two is true.
If he's a better CB than S - he shouldn't have been moved to safety. This would mean that the defensive coordinator made a mistake.
If he's a better S than CB, then the Chiefs are wrong to want him as a CB.
|
Here I am again agreeing with dane.
He must have been the best safety they had. And more versatile than the other cbs. If you have other cbs that are good/decent there but cant play safety worth a shit and you have this guy who can, you move him and it makes your team better. Doesnt mean the coordinator made a mistake, just means they under recruited the safety position or had injuries that they couldn't account for.
Take fuller for example. I think he was a capable corner but his versatility allowed him to move to safety when thornhill went down. The redskins are putting him back at cb. They aren't wrong to do that and we werent idiots for moving him to safety.