This is starting to remind me of the old days when Hamas used to have to bust out the "e-crayons" to explain shit to SAUTO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwistedChief
 A real life Johnny Cochran our hands here.
Just a question: if the timeline of your standard of proof is "never again," when do you feel you'll be able to collect on this bet? |
Jesus tapdancing Christ; is Andy Reid going to coach the Chiefs after retirement, resigning, or from the great beyond?
A: When the partnership is dissolved, dipshit. Hence the phrase "long-term bet".
Quote:
In contrast, SAUTO seems like he'll be able to collect the second the Chiefs release any player for any behavior aside from CHARGES OF murder or rape.
For you to win, the Chiefs will have to keep every single player accused of anything short of murder or rape...for eternity. Or in my estimation, until Clark Hunt is no longer owner of the Chiefs.
|
No, no, no, no, no, no, and NO.
"In contrast", it appears that your ability to understand rudimentary conversations in the English language lies somewhere between, "refugee off the boat" and "amoeba".
Quote:
|
SDH, I know you purported to be unable to make this any clearer to the esteemed ladies and gentlemen of the jury, but we collectively ask that you try harder.
|
I've got one last e-crayon for you. The color is burnt orange. Why? Because it's a shitty color that no one likes and the only one I am going to waste on you:
In the normal course of events, the Chiefs are free to trade, acquire, and release any player they choose. But if one of their A+ players gets in a legal tussle, they may
not outright release him for no compensation unless he has been charged with murder or rape.
They may release or trade said player ONLY when his current contract expires, or the player leaves at seasons end because they have made it clear that they will not re-sign or pick up an option.