Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut
I'm okay with him. I think it's Crow that's really after him. I'm just saying that the production will stand out for NFL front offices.
Where I'd like him in this defense is that strong-side DE that's less of a pure pass rusher. Those TFL figures are exceptional; the dude just makes a hash of things for opposing offenses. He has good length, he's physical, has a solid motor, looks to play with good core strength. He has solid technique; good hand-fighting skills from what I could see. He'd be a nice strong-side 5-tech here.
I kinda think we need to get away from the 'edge' analysis we have been doing for so long that relies on explosion and athleticism. Sure, when you're looking at stand-up OLB's or wide-9 kind of ends, explosion and bend are crucial. But if you're looking at that 4-3 under with the wider split on the strong side, you need a guy that can do a little more to control the line of scrimmage and be physical. This guy isn't an edge like we're used to - he's going to be used differently here. But we also shouldn't look at him through that same lens.
In the right role, I think Ferguson could be pretty good for us. He'd be a replacement for Houston as the 'heavy' 5-tech on the strong side.
Then again, we kinda have that already in Speaks. I don't care for Speaks, but I think he can be okay in that role. I think Ferguson could be a lot better, but it's still not where I'd go with my 1st.
It's not the best use of capital, IMO. I wouldn't go that route in the 1st and like you would consider it in the 2nd.
|
Yea if we didn’t already have Speaks and were cutting Houston I’d be all for that, but I think Speaks will be fine in that role and dare I say good. So, if we’re taking an edge rusher I’d prefer somebody that is going to take over for Ford or a Bruce Irvin type that we can put at SLB.
I was under the impression that those that want Ferguson liked him at LEO.