Quote:
Originally Posted by HolyHandgernade
Oh, come on Pitt, you're better than that, read the context of what he was saying. He said that 10 years was a good measure of a program, especially compared to what they were before, and now the merits of that 10 years has made them an SEC team. There are two implications in that: First, people always assume the top of the SEC when they throw around a genreic statement like that, they aren't talking about Vanderbilt. Second, it implies that MU's football play is what got them the invite. If A&M doesn't go, MU gets no invite. If Missouri doesn't have St. Louis and KC, WVU get that invite.
|
Do you really think that Mizzou would have gotten an invite to the SEC if we were at the same level we were twenty years ago?
Do you really think that WVU and TCU were invited to the Big XII because the conference wanted to lock down West Virginia and Texas markets?