Quote:
Originally Posted by Rausch
I like the idea of not just adding one guy and saying we've "addressed" the position.
I like signing a vet FA, AND drafting the best QB available, and if the damned world league wouldn't have gone tits up I'd look there as well.
The Niners didn't quit looking for QB's because they had Montana. Packers kept drafting and adding guys behind good QB's.
You should be looking to improve your starter or depth every single year at that position...
|
I agree, but not all at once.
Sure, grab one this year and dedicate another good pick to the position in 2014. But I'm not going to go balls to the walls
this season. You don't need to stock your entire QB roster in one off-season, especially if you're looking to build a 'pipeline'.
We're just trying to do too much in one bite. I think this is the year that you get your QBOTF and find a competent veteran to either transition into the kid or just as veteran backup. Next year you keep your eyes open for another value QB in the 2nd or 3rd round and as the years go you continue to try to bring guys in and create depth at the position.
But it's not like the Packers were throwing picks at QB once Rodgers stuck. When you have a great young QB, take another QB if he slides, but it's a little nutty to continue to force the issue at the position.