***NON-POLITICAL COVID-19 Discussion Thread***

[JakeF]

A couple of reminders...

Originally Posted by Bwana

Once again, don't come in this thread with some kind of political agenda, or you will be shown the door. If you want to go that route, there is a thread about this in DC.

Originally Posted by Dartgod

People, there is a lot of good information in this thread, let's try to keep the petty bickering to a minimum.

We all have varying opinions about the impact of this, the numbers, etc. We will all never agree with each other. But we can all keep it civil.

Thanks!

Click here for the original OP:

Spoiler!

Apparently the CoronaVirus can survive on a inanimate objects, such as door knobs, for 9 days.

California coronavirus case could be first spread within U.S. community, CDC says
By SOUMYA KARLAMANGLA, JACLYN COSGROVE
FEB. 26, 2020 8:04 PM

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is investigating what could be the first case of novel coronavirus in the United States involving a patient in California who neither recently traveled out of the country nor was in contact with someone who did.

“At this time, the patient’s exposure is unknown. It’s possible this could be an instance of community spread of COVID-19, which would be the first time this has happened in the United States,” the CDC said in a statement. “Community spread means spread of an illness for which the source of infection is unknown. It’s also possible, however, that the patient may have been exposed to a returned traveler who was infected.”

The individual is a resident of Solano County and is receiving medical care in Sacramento County, according to the state Department of Public Health.

The CDC said the “case was detected through the U.S. public health system — picked up by astute clinicians.”

Officials at UC Davis Medical Center expanded on what the federal agency might have meant by that in an email sent Wednesday, as reported by the Davis Enterprise newspaper.

The patient arrived at UC Davis Medical Center from another hospital Feb. 19 and “had already been intubated, was on a ventilator, and given droplet protection orders because of an undiagnosed and suspected viral condition,” according to an email sent by UC Davis officials that was obtained by the Davis Enterprise.

The staff at UC Davis requested COVID-19 testing by the CDC, but because the patient didn’t fit the CDC’s existing criteria for the virus, a test wasn’t immediately administered, according to the email. The CDC then ordered the test Sunday, and results were announced Wednesday. Hospital administrators reportedly said in the email that despite these issues, there has been minimal exposure at the hospital because of safety protocols they have in place.

A UC Davis Health spokesperson declined Wednesday evening to share the email with The Times.

Since Feb. 2, more than 8,400 returning travelers from China have entered California, according to the state health department. They have been advised to self-quarantine for 14 days and limit interactions with others as much as possible, officials said.

“This is a new virus, and while we are still learning about it, there is a lot we already know,” Dr. Sonia Angell, director of the California Department of Public Health, said in a statement. “We have been anticipating the potential for such a case in the U.S., and given our close familial, social and business relationships with China, it is not unexpected that the first case in the U.S. would be in California.”

It is not clear how the person became infected, but public health workers could not identify any contacts with people who had traveled to China or other areas where the virus is widespread. That raises concern that the virus is spreading in the United States, creating a challenge for public health officials, experts say.

“It’s the first signal that we could be having silent transmission in the community,” said Lawrence Gostin, director of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law. “It probably means there are many more cases out there, and it probably means this individual has infected others, and now it’s a race to try to find out who that person has infected.”

On Tuesday, the CDC offered its most serious warning to date that the United States should expect and prepare for the coronavirus to become a more widespread health issue.

“Ultimately, we expect we will see coronavirus spread in this country,” said Nancy Messonnier, director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. “It’s not so much a question of if, but a question of when.”

According to the CDC’s latest count Wednesday morning, 59 U.S. residents have tested positive for the new strain of coronavirus — 42 of whom are repatriated citizens from a Diamond Princess cruise. That number has grown by two since Messonnier’s last count Tuesday, although the CDC was not immediately available to offer details on the additional cases.

More than 82,000 cases of coronavirus have been reported globally, and more than 2,700 people have died, with the majority in mainland China, the epicenter of the outbreak.

But public health leaders have repeatedly reminded residents that the health risk from the novel coronavirus to the general public remains low.

“While COVID-19 has a high transmission rate, it has a low mortality rate,” the state Department of Public Health said in a statement Wednesday. “From the international data we have, of those who have tested positive for COVID-19, approximately 80% do not exhibit symptoms that would require hospitalization. There have been no confirmed deaths related to COVID-19 in the United States to date.”

CDC officials have also warned that although the virus is likely to spread in U.S. communities, the flu still poses a greater risk.

Gostin said the news of potential silent transmission does not eliminate the possibility of containing the virus in the U.S. and preventing an outbreak.

“There are few enough cases that we should at least try,” he said. “Most of us are not optimistic that that will be successful, but we’re still in the position to try.”

[Monticore]

Originally Posted by stevieray

Look at the new motorcycle helmet law in Mo.

It's up to you now.

As it should be.

The doctors don’t have the choice on whether or not they have to treat your dumb ass though .

[loochy]

Originally Posted by Monticore

The doctors don’t have the choice on whether or not they have to treat your dumb ass though .

I was thinking more of the insurance companies. It's fine if you don't want to wear a helmet, but they can now decline head-trauma related coverage.


It's a choice you make, so alright.

[stevieray]

Originally Posted by Monticore

The doctors don’t have the choice on whether or not they have to treat your dumb ass though .

aawwww

Am I supposed to feel sorry for you?

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by Monticore

The doctors don’t have the choice on whether or not they have to treat your dumb ass though .

Oh well I know when I signed up for my job it was to do only what I wanted to do and when I wanted to do it.....

[TLO]

Moderna phase 3 data day!

[MahomesMagic]

Predicted economic fallout from the #COVID19 pandemic might kill ~170,000 children, with an additional 12 million children expected to suffer from the most severe forms of malnutrition (stunting and wasting).https://t.co/83qpss2r5c

— Prof Francois Balloux (@BallouxFrancois) December 15, 2020

[BigRedChief]

Originally Posted by loochy

I was thinking more of the insurance companies. It's fine if you don't want to wear a helmet, but they can now decline head-trauma related coverage.


It's a choice you make, so alright.

Doesn't work that way. Someone pulls out in front of a motorcycle, no helmet, no insurance, your still going to get medical care, Admitted to a hospital and care provided that same as if you had insurance. Lots of old people down here. Old people pulling out into traffic in front of a motorcycle happens every single day in my city.


They will have an average $250K bill. Too bad for them right? The difference is 90% never pay. So who pays? We, the taxpayer, are going to be stuck with the bill.

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by BigRedChief

Doesn't work that way. Someone pulls out in front of a motorcycle, no helmet, no insurance, your still going to get medical care, Admitted to a hospital and care provided. They will have an average $250K bill. Too bad for them right? The difference is 90% never pay. So who pays? We, the taxpayer, are going to be stuck with the bill.

So move to Canada....

[R Clark]

Originally Posted by petegz28

So move to Canada....

Nope I’ll stay here and pay taxes ,insurance ,medical. Don’t need big brother to babysit .

[loochy]

Originally Posted by BigRedChief

Doesn't work that way. Someone pulls out in front of a motorcycle, no helmet, no insurance, your still going to get medical care, Admitted to a hospital and care provided that same as if you had insurance. Lots of old people down here. Old people pulling out into traffic in front of a motorcycle happens every single day in my city.


They will have an average $250K bill. Too bad for them right? The difference is 90% never pay. So who pays? We, the taxpayer, are going to be stuck with the bill.

That's a different argument. I'm only concerned about the insurance company in my statement.

[loochy]

Originally Posted by R Clark

Nope I’ll stay here and pay taxes ,insurance ,medical. Don’t need big brother to babysit .

You already have big brother to babysit.

[loochy]

Originally Posted by petegz28

So move to Canada....

Oh, and BTW, one can't just "move to Canada". They aren't like us...you can't just enter the country and squat.


Actually, I would like to move to Canada. I've been there to visit a few times and I REALLY like it (Vancouver Island, at least).

[Marcellus]

Originally Posted by loochy

Oh, and BTW, one can't just "move to Canada". They aren't like us...you can't just enter the country and squat.


Actually, I would like to move to Canada. I've been there to visit a few times and I REALLY like it (Vancouver Island, at least).

Anytime someone wants to talk up Canada's "free" healthcare system and socialist's policies I always say that the day the US takes up Canada's legal and illegal immigration policies we can talk about it.

[O.city]

Moderna's data upon a quick look seems similar to Pfizer's. Someone more nuanced than me would have to give you much on it.

[BigRedChief]

Originally Posted by loochy

You already have big brother to babysit.

I posted on the next door app a pontoon boat I'm giving away. On Facebook the next day I got an ad for a "Pontoon Queen" T-shirt.