Is... is Kendall Fuller not that good?

[Dante84]

I was expecting a ton of PBU’s and QB’s avoiding his side of the field... instead, he falls down a bunch, gets beat and gets flagged for PI a lot.

Perhaps that’s just my impression.

Is it scheme? Youth? Wha ha happen?

[arrwheader]

Christ it’s because Bob Sutton sucks BALLS. There is so much evidence to support it or lack of evidence suggesting it’s anything otherwise. He should have been shit canned last year. They re tooled the entire defense and they still suck. What does that tell you?. Bob Sutton sucks dick unless he has primo talent and who wouldn’t suck if you had that? Oh wait I forgot he manages to still **** up and drop them in coverage and all kinds of other dumb shit that loses us games.

[Kiimo]

Maybe the reason all our new guys on defense suck is because the defense takes three years to learn, by our own d-coordinator's admission.

People playing out of position or thinking instead of moving always look like bad defensive players. They're all hesitating and playing on their heels.

Here's an idea try to steal Washington's defensive coordinator instead of their players.

[Molitoth]

Originally Posted by Kiimosabi

Maybe the reason all our new guys on defense suck is because the defense takes three years to learn, by our own d-coordinator's admission.

People playing out of position or thinking instead of moving always look like bad defensive players. They're all hesitating and playing on their heels.
.

This has been Soren Petro's opinion as well.

[htismaqe]

Fuller has played below expectations. So has Hitchens.

The only guys that seems to be playing up to his potential (even though it isn't a high ceiling) is Scandrick and he's a 10-year vet.

Sutton HAS to be the problem at this point.

[Funkstown]

Nah, it's because Bob Sutton is an idiot.

[loochy]

Originally Posted by wazu

Impossible to say why as there is no common link.

[JakeF]

Originally Posted by rabblerouser

He'd look a lot better with Patrick Peterson on the other side of the field...

You think? Right now most teams go after Steven Nelson for most of the game. If we stick Peterson how there then those teams will switch to going after Fuller. He's been struggling quite a bit.

[InChiefsHeaven]

We should put Tyreek in on defense from time to time...guarantee he will get to the ball...

[MahiMike]

They're all confused and a step behind.

[Iowanian]

Ragland has regressed, hitchens looked better last year.....

I just can't decide if the obvious D.C. Issue is heat is wrong or if the front 3 are shitty and not eating blocks which hurts the LB ability to make plays.

[Mecca]

Hitchens may honestly just be a 4-3 LB that doesn't translate to a 3-4.

[T-post Tom]

Originally Posted by Kiimosabi

Why do people think Fuller is playing outside? Scandrick and Nelson are the outside corners.

Seems like Fuller was getting outside reps thru game 4. (Maybe 5?) Is there a way to get those stats?

[JakeF]

Originally Posted by Mecca

Hitchens may honestly just be a 4-3 LB that doesn't translate to a 3-4.

So Fuller is a slot CB that we are using on the outside. Hitchens is a 4-3 LB that we are using in a 3-4. Ragland is a 2-down dinosaur LB that should have played under Marty Schottenheimer. What could possibly be the problem?

[Mecca]

Originally Posted by JakeF

So Fuller is a slot CB that we are using on the outside. Hitchens is a 4-3 LB that we are using in a 3-4. Ragland is a 2-down dinosaur LB that should have played under Marty Schottenheimer. What could possibly be the problem?

And a safety that doesn't play, a one trick pony OLB mixed with another OLB that is about half the player he used to be...

Oh and a DL that talks a huge game and then plays hard about 40% of the time.

[ROYC75]

Originally Posted by Kiimosabi

Why do people think Fuller is playing outside? Scandrick and Nelson are the outside corners.

They be fans that watch football but doesn't understand how football is played.