![]() |
Quote:
I don't know why Brady even comes into the conversation. He's a year younger than Manning, and doesn't have the medical baggage. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
His neck will not be an issue, it will be stronger than ever. And the nerves in his arm are regenerating at an alarming rate. Every team that has worked him out has said that he looks like the same Manning from two or three years ago. |
Spin away little top ROFL
|
I have no doubt that Peyton will be effective, and maybe for up to 3 more seasons, but the problem is he can't fix everything that needs fixed in Denver. He can take care of the QB issue (barring injury) but that doesn't fix everything else by a long shot. I think he's gonna collect a paycheck but not a Lombardi Trophy.
|
Quote:
Honestly, I think Manning, even at 100%, only has a few seasons left and while he'll certainly elevate the Broncos' overall level of play, he's not going to win them a Super Bowl. They may go 11-5, 12-4, win the AFCW, win a playoff game or two, but I don't see much more. To win consistently, you need an organization that can build and sustain (e.g. New England, Pittsburgh, NY Giants). The Colts were the unusual instance of a team literally being carried by one of the greats in his prime. Look at Montana's post-Niner career, and that's what you'll see from Peyton. |
Manning's arrival turned the once one-quarterback AFC West (San Diego's Philip Rivers ) into one that boasts Manning, Oakland's Carson Palmer , Rivers -- and a good Chiefs team.
Quote:
|
The good thing about Manning going to Denver is that all their salary cap money is gone. Any chance to improve the team is out the window. At the end of 3 years there will be a lot of younger players that go to FA because there is no money to pay them. You end up with a 2-14 husk and maybe a 1st overall pick when hes done
|
Quote:
Manning will be 36 in only a few days. He's a year and a half older. In football years, that's significant. I would say "two good seasons" would be about right. I can see either of them playing into their Favre years but not as effectively by any means. |
Quote:
Manning is going to play at a high level until he's 41? Are you that ****ing stupid? Elway's last year he only started 12 games. And second, he had a MUCH better surrounding cast than what Manning has now, or will have next season. It's not even close. Manning will be good for a couple of more wins than last years team, but not much more. 10 wins or so I'd guess. That's if he manages to make it through the whole season. No one knows how his neck is going to hold up. And if he does get injured again, he's done. He's not some missing piece to a team that is ready made for a SB run. The Donks have a shit defense and shit offense for the most part. In Indy Manning had weapons galore. |
Quote:
You have no idea how the neck will respond to the hits, the conditions, the elements in Denver. It's a good move for the immediate future, although the weapons he has suck and Clark and Stokley aren't making them much better. |
Quote:
The Broncos D is trash. Their skill position players are average at best. The line is a terrible pass blocking unit. |
Quote:
Home: Cleveland Pittsburgh Houston New Orleans Tennessee Road: Baltimore Cincinnati Atlanta Carolina New England They still need more than Manning... there are some really difficult games in that group of 10. Manning gives them more than a fighter's chance to win, but they need some other players and the defense is going to be just as critical to their success as Manning. I hope most Denver fans realize this when they're throwing out the 11-12 win comments. It's easy to say they are 3-4 wins better with Manning, and in a generic conversation, it's true. But, apply that to the 2012 schedule and it's going to be a tough battle to 11 wins. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:02 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.