ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Am I the only one here that still wants the Chiefs to win some games this season? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=249958)

Rams Fan 09-13-2011 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shogun (Post 7907332)
Rams lost their best RB and receiver.

I don't think our season is that bad

no offense rams fan

:(

SJ39 is probably out for this week, and maybe next. But Cadillac and Norwood are backing up. Amendola is probably out till Week 10.

Bartell fractured his ****ing neck in two places. Rams only have 3 CBs right now.

Dr. Johnny Fever 09-13-2011 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shogun (Post 7907332)
Rams lost their best RB and receiver.

I don't think our season is that bad

no offense rams fan

Being in Ramsland I know it was a tough week for stl. Bradford > Cassel though and he should play Monday night.

Rams Fan 09-13-2011 10:52 PM

Everyone was going down left and right at the game. Scary shit.

L.A. Chieffan 09-13-2011 10:53 PM

why do we always have to suck?

Dr. Johnny Fever 09-13-2011 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 7907338)
why do we always have to suck?

KC sports is cursed. I blame Carl/Allard/Marv/Mackovic/Pena/Muser/Bell/Gansz/Muir/Haley/Herm

Ming the Merciless 09-13-2011 11:04 PM

ill ride w you

L.A. Chieffan 09-13-2011 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beer me (Post 7907345)
KC sports is cursed. I blame Carl/Allard/Marv/Mackovic/Pena/Muser/Bell/Gansz/Muir/Haley/Herm

seriously. what did you guys do after 1985? bury a tribe of gypsies underneath arrowhead and royals parking lot?

Ace Gunner 09-13-2011 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beer me (Post 7907328)
I don't see the Colts being worse. I know Manning is out but they have more parts than just him. The Texans could actually be good. Panthers... I think they win some games this year... Cam was great in game 1. Broncos and Seahawks seems to have some parts.... much like the Chiefs.

I was was glad to see Newton light the candle, I felt as Gruden does about Newton. You put him in the right offense and he's gonna move the ball. But he's not gonna carry that team yet. The Texans are good, but the defense isn't as good as what you saw there last week. The Colts' Manning makes that OL look good - it's been said, doubted, debated, I think the verdict is in. The Colts are aging in the wrong areas - QB and pass rush. They may not be as bad as the Chiefs, then again they probly are without Manning. The Browns are the only team that may actually have a better record tan the Chiefs when it's done. I don't know, I'm just guessing that if the season were ending in a few weeks, these teams all look to be in the Luck sweepstakes ahead of the Chiefs.

suzzer99 09-13-2011 11:11 PM

What phase of grief about the Chiefs season are we all in now? Bargaining?

Dr. Johnny Fever 09-13-2011 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 7907355)
seriously. what did you guys do after 1985? bury a tribe of gypsies underneath arrowhead and royals parking lot?

I'm not sure. Seems like it doesn't it?

007 09-13-2011 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 7907355)
seriously. what did you guys do after 1985? bury a tribe of gypsies underneath arrowhead and royals parking lot?

The Royals were still good up to 1989. Unfortunately the A's were unstoppable then.

Dr. Johnny Fever 09-13-2011 11:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 7907370)
The Royals were still good up to 1989. Unfortunately the A's were unstoppable then.

Moneyball

ChiefsCountry 09-13-2011 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 7907370)
The Royals were still good up to 1989. Unfortunately the A's were unstoppable then.

How shitty it was in MLB back then, Royals had the second best record in baseball and didn't make the playoffs. Same thing in 1993 with San Francisco and Atlanta.

kysirsoze 09-13-2011 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suzzer99 (Post 7907362)
What phase of grief about the Chiefs season are we all in now? Bargaining?

At least most of the board is well past denial.

Dr. Johnny Fever 09-13-2011 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 7907374)
How shitty it was in MLB back then, Royals had the second best record in baseball and didn't make the playoffs. Same thing in 1993 with San Francisco and Atlanta.

Thank God for the wild card now... even though we haven't qualified for that yet since.

ChiefsCountry 09-13-2011 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beer me (Post 7907376)
Thank God for the wild card now... even though we haven't qualified for that yet since.

1994 we would have made the playoffs if it wasn't for the strike. Not to mention our pitching staff would have made some noise in the playoffs - Appier, Cone, and Gordon.

Dr. Johnny Fever 09-14-2011 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 7907382)
1994 we would have made the playoffs if it wasn't for the strike. Not to mention our pitching staff would have made some noise in the playoffs - Appier, Cone, and Gordon.

Things lost. Luckily for me I actually believe my Royals are going to make waves and compete for the playoffs next year once we have some more starting pitching.

/homer.

WhiteWhale 09-14-2011 12:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrazyPhuD (Post 7907168)
Yes?

What's the best position at the end of the season?

Super bowl winner of course.....

What's the second best?

1st pick in the draft(especially now that contracts aren't insane).

Look I'd love t see the team win out, but you know what, I don't want wins, I want championships. Until the chiefs get a franchise QB we're not winning a championship, that's not a maybe, it's a statistic for how the game is played today.

LMAO

Yes. I would MUCH rather KC be like Carolina and not like that shitty team in Pittsburgh. I mean, the Steelers NEVER pick first.. they suck!

Chiefs fans are so defeatist.

NJChiefsFan 09-14-2011 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr_capone (Post 7907152)
FYP

If Cassel is gone next season, I'm happy to give Haley an additional 2 seasons to get something going. I honestly and truly believe that handcuffing that farce of a QB to Haley was a huge mistake.

Thank you. I am not liking this growing idea that Haley and Cassel are linked together. If you want to say that his offseason decision calls for a firing, fine. I don't agree but whatever, atleast thats something Haley did.

All the stuff about Haley having lost the team, or Haley forcing Weiss out, its all assumptions made by people who had their minds made up prior to the "news". I don't know if he lost the team or not, but I didn't really see it Sunday. I just saw a team that wasn't prepared, gave the ball away, lost a HUGE player, and got down early. Have an offense not built to come back, and you get a blow out.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 7907145)
I'll be ready to win on Sunday morning. Then __ will push our shit in, starting a shit storm for the next 6 1/2 days.

Rinse, repeat.

This. I am as down as I have been after 1 game in the season. Atleast going into crappy seasons you knew. I wasn't expecting a trip to the AFC Championship, but I was hoping we could fight for the Division. All things combined tough to have hope. THAT being said, going to be rooting for them to win on Sunday. If we get to the point where the season is officically lost, then I might start thinking about the draft. Too far away.

58kcfan89 09-14-2011 01:12 AM

I'll be cheering for the Chiefs every week this year. But if/when they lose, I won't be getting too down about it. Maybe those 3 years from '07-'09 desensitized me to losing, but I don't get nearly as down about losing as I used to. Or maybe it's that I finally saw the writing on the wall that Cassel won't ever lead us to a SB and it'll take a shit season to get rid of him. Either way, I'm not gunna worry too much about a crap Chiefs season, because I think/hope it'll help fix a lot of things that have been wrong with this franchise for a long time (lack of a stud QB, not spending the money they have to get some quality depth, etc.). If it turns out to be a great season, that's fine. But after seeing our game vs. Buffalo and looking at the schedule, I just don't see this team winning many games. I've accepted it and hope for a brighter future.

Micjones 09-14-2011 03:14 AM

I definitely still want and expect to see them win.
The FO can't fold the tent here. Shit happens...do your best to mitigate the damage and press forward.

Pasta Little Brioni 09-14-2011 07:33 AM

After burying RedThat, now we have more reeruns popping up wanting to lose out and it's suddenly OK.

I wanted the Chiefs to win every game since I've been a fan, even during the Herm years, I'll do the same this year and every year after. **** rooting for a higher draft pick, things don't always work out the way you want them to.

Pasta Little Brioni 09-14-2011 07:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 7907459)
I definitely still want and expect to see them win.
The FO can't fold the tent here. Shit happens...do your best to mitigate the damage and press forward.

Yep, let's see how they handle adversity. If they have the attitude of many of the posters here, yes it will be an ugly season.

Frosty 09-14-2011 07:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 7907397)
I mean, the Steelers NEVER pick first.. they suck!

The one time in recent history that they picked in the top 10, they picked a franchise QB. Seemed to work out okay for them.

durtyrute 09-14-2011 07:53 AM

Of course I want them to win. I want to kick every teams ass 50-0 every year for the rest of my life, but yeah........

loochy 09-14-2011 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beer me (Post 7907137)
Do you believe in tanking to try for the top pick?

Yes. It worked for the San Antonio Spurs. They tanked the 96-97 season to get Tim Duncan. Since then they've enjoyed a 13 year run of awesomeness and 4 championships.

milkman 09-14-2011 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frosty (Post 7907610)
The one time in recent history that they picked in the top 10, they picked a franchise QB. Seemed to work out okay for them.

They picked Roethlisberger at 11.

I will not root for the Chiefs to lose, but the impact of Berry's loss is going to be profound.

Berry struggled early in pass coverage as a rookie, but he improved tremendously as the season progressed, and that's going to be a huge loss for us in pass defense.

But his impact as a run defender, and the loss of that impact in this defense can not be overstated.

He was the primary reason that this run defense wasn't among the wost in the league last year.

Romeo Crennel is going to have to work a miricle to keep this defense from falling into the 25th or lower defense in the NFL this year.

With Detroit, Green Bay, Pittsburg and the Jets on the schedule this year, I expect Cassel will have worse games than this one against Buffalo.

keg in kc 09-14-2011 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 7907711)
They picked Roethlisberger at 11.

I will not root for the Chiefs to lose, but the impact of Berry's loss is going to be profound.

Berry struggled early in pass coverage as a rookie, but he improved tremendously as the season progressed, and that's going to be a huge loss for us in pass defense.

But his impact as a run defender, and the loss of that impact in this defense can not be overstated.

He was the primary reason that this run defense wasn't among the wost in the league last year.

Romeo Crennel is going to have to work a miricle to keep this defense from falling into the 25th or lower defense in the NFL this year.

With Detroit, Green Bay, Pittsburg and the Jets on the schedule this year, I expect Cassel will have worse games than this one against Buffalo.

I agree with all of that. I don't know if Barry was the 'best' player on defense yet, but I think the dropoff between him and anyone else at his position on the roster was far and away the largest, and I think the importance of his role in and his presence with the defense can't be overstated.

As far as winning, I don't want to see them lose. Ever. I hate losing so much I'll get to the point where I stop watching games altogether. So, no, I don't want them to sacrifice a season for any reason. And as far as Luck or anybody else goes, I wouldn't get my hopes up anyway. I don't have any faith that the franchise would ever draft a quarterback early under any circumstances, so you'd be left with a situation where you're going 2-14 for a shot at what would probably end up being a defensive or offensive lineman.

Yay.

Chiefs Pantalones 09-14-2011 09:29 AM

I don't ever want to see my team lose. We WILL get a franchise QB. Whether it's sooner or later, I don't know. That doesn't mean that Cassel will still be around before then. I have faith that the front office realizes that Cassel is not the answer. Now we may see a stop gap veteran in there before we get a franchise QB, but at least it's not Cassel. We don't have to worry about the Chiefs realizing Cassel is not the answer, Cassel is doing a good job of proving that on his own.

The Bad Guy 09-14-2011 09:36 AM

I want Matt Cassel gone, and I want Andrew Luck. I don't care about these next 15 games as much as I care about getting someone in here that can actually be a franchise QB.

I'm tired of the nonsense and the blind faith I've put in these awful QBs.

Get me someone who is elite at the quarterback position for once in my lifetime.

Frosty 09-14-2011 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 7907711)
They picked Roethlisberger at 11.

Doh! I was thinking it was at 7.

Still, they took one when they had finally sucked enough to have a chance.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Vanilla Thunder (Post 7907811)
We WILL get a franchise QB.

I would have more faith in that if it weren't for the fact that they haven't had one since Len Dawson.

Brock 09-14-2011 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 7907819)
I want Matt Cassel gone, and I want Andrew Luck. I don't care about these next 15 games as much as I care about getting someone in here that can actually be a franchise QB.

I'm tired of the nonsense and the blind faith I've put in these awful QBs.

Get me someone who is elite at the quarterback position for once in my lifetime.

Pretty much.

WhiteWhale 09-14-2011 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frosty (Post 7907610)
The one time in recent history that they picked in the top 10, they picked a franchise QB. Seemed to work out okay for them.

Ben was picked 11th and the Steelers did not intentionally tank the season to get him. He was also the 3rd QB taken that year, and IMO, the best of the three.

Eli Manning was the guy everyone was drooling over, and he's the least of the bunch.

If a good franchise develops a talented QB, then they'll succeed.

A bad franchise can draft a great QB and it's a disaster. I think Carson Palmer would be an elite QB right now had he been drafted by a team that isn't a complete ****ing circus.

I want us to draft a QB, but I'd never advocate tanking to pick high in the draft and I certainly don't think picking #1 is the absolute best position to be in if you don't win a SB.

ToxSocks 09-14-2011 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 7907711)
They picked Roethlisberger at 11.

I will not root for the Chiefs to lose, but the impact of Berry's loss is going to be profound.

Berry struggled early in pass coverage as a rookie, but he improved tremendously as the season progressed, and that's going to be a huge loss for us in pass defense.

But his impact as a run defender, and the loss of that impact in this defense can not be overstated.

He was the primary reason that this run defense wasn't among the wost in the league last year.

Romeo Crennel is going to have to work a miricle to keep this defense from falling into the 25th or lower defense in the NFL this year.

With Detroit, Green Bay, Pittsburg and the Jets on the schedule this year, I expect Cassel will have worse games than this one against Buffalo.

Truth hurts.

Sigh....the Lions are going to murder us....

stonedstooge 09-14-2011 09:57 AM

I get upset when the Chiefs lose preseason games. And they don't even count

Predarat 09-14-2011 10:02 AM

I want them to win, just enough to get Andrew Luck, so 2-3 games maybe.

loochy 09-14-2011 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 7907851)
Ben was picked 11th and the Steelers did not intentionally tank the season to get him. He was also the 3rd QB taken that year, and IMO, the best of the three.

Eli Manning was the guy everyone was drooling over, and he's the least of the bunch.

If a good franchise develops a talented QB, then they'll succeed.

A bad franchise can draft a great QB and it's a disaster. I think Carson Palmer would be an elite QB right now had he been drafted by a team that isn't a complete ****ing circus.

I want us to draft a QB, but I'd never advocate tanking to pick high in the draft and I certainly don't think picking #1 is the absolute best position to be in if you don't win a SB.

Yeah, but I think this team would be a lot better if we had that "least of the bunch."

Frosty 09-14-2011 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 7907851)
Ben was picked 11th and the Steelers did not intentionally tank the season to get him. He was also the 3rd QB taken that year, and IMO, the best of the three.

Wasn't talking about intentionally tanking the season. Just looking for a silver lining in what appears to be a shit season.

milkman 09-14-2011 10:08 AM

As I look at the schedule, there isn't a team that we face that doesn't have some ability to get after the QB.

I'm wondering now if Cassel will have a single game that he surpsses 150 yards passing.

I'm wondering how many games he will finish with fewer than 100 yards.

I think that first sub-100 yard game comes this weekend against the Lions.

ChiefsCountry 09-14-2011 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 7907851)
A bad franchise can draft a great QB and it's a disaster. I think Carson Palmer would be an elite QB right now had he been drafted by a team that isn't a complete ****ing circus.

Kimo von Oelhoffen had more to do with that than him being on the Bengals.

Chiefnj2 09-14-2011 10:14 AM

It's going to be fun reading all of the debates about whether KC should take Barkley, Jones, Foles, Cousins, Weedon or Lindley.

Jones and Lindley are probably my front runners right now, I don't have a strong opinion either way. There seems to be a huge chasm between all of them and Luck.

OnTheWarpath15 09-14-2011 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 7907134)
Want to win? Hell yes.


Reality? Hell no.

Pretty much sums it up.

Want to win? Damn straight.

Expect to win? Not so much.

Chiefnj2 09-14-2011 10:25 AM

Any reports from practice this week? Is Haley killing them? Overall attitude of the team?

What's odd is that I honestly have no idea if they will come out fired up or be flat in Detroit.

ToxSocks 09-14-2011 10:27 AM

I put my homer glasses on this preseason in hopes that the team made enough improvements to carry Cassel. I hoped that Cassel made enough improvements to carry his own weight.

Sunday hit me like a bucket of cold water. At least with Berry in the line up we had a chance. That chance blew out with Eric's ACL.

And sadly, even if we do draft in the top 5, I'm 95% certain we won't be taking a QB.

And in case we do, I don't think Haley is the guy to develop him. Screaming and ranting at a rookie QB probably isn't the best way to settle his nerves. I don't think Haley has the patience to develop a rookie QB.

The Bad Guy 09-14-2011 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 7907913)
I put my homer glasses on this preseason in hopes that the team made enough improvements to carry Cassel. I hoped that Cassel made enough improvements to carry his own weight.

Sunday hit me like a bucket of cold water. At least with Berry in the line up we had a chance. That chance blew out with Eric's ACL.

And sadly, even if we do draft in the top 5, I'm 95% certain we won't be taking a QB.

And in case we do, I don't think Haley is the guy to develop him. Screaming and ranting at a rookie QB probably isn't the best way to settle his nerves. I don't think Haley has the patience to develop a rookie QB.

Then Haley isn't the man I want coaching this team.

He's not going to have a choice. This squad is sinking with a noodle-armed, weak minded QB. He can't handle pressure, at all.

This team needs a franchise signal caller and if we go 1-15, it's worth it to me to get him.

I think they absolutely would take Luck if they had the #1 pick. Absolutely. T

ChiefsCountry 09-14-2011 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 7907917)
Then Haley isn't the man I want coaching this team.

He's not going to have a choice. This squad is sinking with a noodle-armed, weak minded QB. He can't handle pressure, at all.

This team needs a franchise signal caller and if we go 1-15, it's worth it to me to get him.

I think they absolutely would take Luck if they had the #1 pick. Absolutely. T

If they pass on Luck for Matt Kalil or somebody else, Pioli should have his nuts tied to a cinderblock and thrown into the Missouri River.

lcarus 09-14-2011 10:45 AM

Yeah of course I want them to win each time I sit down on Sunday to watch their game. But realistically I just want them to build a team that can compete for the Super Bowl for several years. We're still not there, and we won't be until our quarterback situation changes. Luck isn't the only way that can happen.

WhiteWhale 09-14-2011 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy (Post 7907872)
Yeah, but I think this team would be a lot better if we had that "least of the bunch."

Yeah, so do I. I want a QB. I loathe Cassel.

Still my initial comment was in regards to a comment about having the #1 pick being the best situation outside of winning the SB.

There are a lot of good QB's in the NFL that weren't picked #1 overall and no college prospect is a sure thing. That's all I was getting at.

Drafting smart is more important than picking in the top 5 a whole bunch.

Chiefs Pantalones 09-14-2011 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 7907882)
As I look at the schedule, there isn't a team that we face that doesn't have some ability to get after the QB.

I'm wondering now if Cassel will have a single game that he surpsses 150 yards passing.

I'm wondering how many games he will finish with fewer than 100 yards.

I think that first sub-100 yard game comes this weekend against the Lions.

I don't think Cassel finishes the season as the starter anyway. And I'm not talking because of injury.

cardken 09-14-2011 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beer me (Post 7907137)
Do you believe in tanking to try for the top pick?

It won't take trying to hit the tank this season. Head Coach clueless, best Defensive players gone for the season and prideful GM in not recognizing his mistake at QB (Cassel). This thing was over before in began. But if we hit rock bottom, the QB (Locker) is there to join a good foundation of Offensive weapons.

Titty Meat 09-14-2011 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 7907929)
If they pass on Luck for Matt Kalil or somebody else, Pioli should have his nuts tied to a cinderblock and thrown into the Missouri River.

Man you scare me because you know he would do it.

Rams Fan 09-14-2011 03:35 PM

Rams are gonna be drafting top 5 if they lose 5 starters a game.

Pasta Little Brioni 09-14-2011 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 7908865)
Rams are gonna be drafting top 5 if they lose 5 starters a game.

Well, either your boys or the G-Men are headed for 0-2.

Rams Fan 09-14-2011 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 7908873)
Well, either your boys or the G-Men are headed for 0-2.

I know.

If it's the Rams: :deevee:

If it's the Giants: :clap:

But I have never ever seen a team lose 5 starters in the span of 1 game due to injury.

Frosty 09-14-2011 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 7908878)
But I have never ever seen a team lose 5 starters in the span of 1 game due to injury.

It looks like it's going to be a brutal season for injuries. The number 1 pick could go to a team that's a complete surprise at this point.

Pasta Little Brioni 09-14-2011 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frosty (Post 7908884)
It looks like it's going to be a brutal season for injuries. The number 1 pick could go to a team that's a complete surprise at this point.

Yep, just goes to show how important those OTA's are.

Rams Fan 09-14-2011 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 7908889)
Yep, just goes to show how important those OTA's are.

Or how an actual offensive line can help a QB. Or, I dunno, have some depth at CB....

If the Rams don't win 8 games this year, I'm going to start getting my ax ready for Spags and Devaney.

Frosty 09-14-2011 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 7908889)
Yep, just goes to show how important those OTA's are.

I think the reduced practice times that the players demanded is going to come back and bite them in the ass over the long run.

Rams Fan 09-14-2011 03:46 PM

And, not trying to make the Berry injury seem minor(it isn't, he's going to be a great safety), but the Rams just lost their #1/#2 CB for the season, lost the only guy who can catch the ball for 8-10 weeks.

Frosty 09-14-2011 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 7908908)
And, not trying to make the Berry injury seem minor(it isn't, he's going to be a great safety), but the Rams just lost their #1/#2 CB for the season, lost the only guy who can catch the ball for 8-10 weeks.

It's really too bad that SJ39 is going to end up wasting his career in football purgatory.

Rams Fan 09-14-2011 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frosty (Post 7908918)
It's really too bad that SJ39 is going to end up wasting his career in football purgatory.

I know. :(

I really hope they make the playoffs this season or next, as I don't think SJ has that much time left in St. Louis.

Pasta Little Brioni 09-14-2011 03:50 PM

Well, they definately play in the right division if making the postseason is what you desire.

Frosty 09-14-2011 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 7908924)
I know. :(

I really hope they make the playoffs this season or next, as I don't think SJ has that much time left in St. Louis.

No offense, but I really hated that SJ went to the Rams. At least Quizz is going to get a chance in Atlanta (Oregon State alum here, if you couldn't tell).

Rams Fan 09-14-2011 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frosty (Post 7908937)
No offense, but I really hated that SJ went to the Rams. At least Quizz is going to get a chance in Atlanta (Oregon State alum here, if you couldn't tell).

The Rams could have been decent for a while if they didn't let their decent FAs walk and draft terrible players.

If Marshall was healthy in 2006, the Rams would have had a great 1-2 RB combo and an even better offense.

Pasta Little Brioni 09-14-2011 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 7908895)
Or how an actual offensive line can help a QB. Or, I dunno, have some depth at CB....

If the Rams don't win 8 games this year, I'm going to start getting my ax ready for Spags and Devaney.

As high as I was on Haley and Pioli, I'm about at the same point. What an absolute F'n joke losing a home opener 41-7 to any team, much less the Bills. The most unprepared Chiefs team I've ever seen and that includes Herm's abortion of a debut as Chiefs coach.

Rams Fan 09-14-2011 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 7908957)
As high as I was on Haley and Pioli, I'm about at the same point. What an absolute F'n joke losing a home opener 41-7 to any team, much less the Bills. The most unprepared Chiefs team I've ever seen and that includes Herm's abortion of a debut as Chiefs coach.

The difference is I'm willing to give them one more season. Spags and Devaney have increased the talent level, no denying that. But there were 4 games last year that stick out to me that Spags had horrible in game management.

I like Devaney, but he needs to address the WR situation for awhile.

whoman69 09-14-2011 07:30 PM

Haley had the same card last year and came up with 10-6 and a division championship. This year comes down to lack of preparation. We have more talent on both sides of the ball that any time in the last 5 years. If we continue to fail Haley's only choice is to be to bench Cassel or lose his job. He might lose his job anyway and should for the way this team was prepared. He's not going to be able to just turn it on. We came into this season behind every other team in the league and preparation. You can't get that back. The theory that 'the plan' would result in less injuries is out the window. FAIL.

lewdog 09-14-2011 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whoman69 (Post 7909407)
If we continue to fail Haley's only choice is to be to bench Cassel or lose his job. .

Do you honestly think upper management or the owners would allow someone like Cassel, who has a hefty contract, to get benched? I could see Haley having the balls to do it but not being allowed to do it.

Extra Point 09-14-2011 09:12 PM

NO Luck in this lottery. We can't suck that bad. Gailey schooled Haley. The rest of the season will determine if Haley can't cut it.

We're STUCK with Cassel, for the next two years, at least.

milkman 09-14-2011 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lewdog_5 (Post 7909610)
Do you honestly think upper management or the owners would allow someone like Cassel, who has a hefty contract, to get benched? I could see Haley having the balls to do it but not being allowed to do it.

Cassel has already gotten all the big money for his contract, so there really isn't any finacial reason at this point to continue to trot his sorry ass out there.

007 09-14-2011 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 7907882)
As I look at the schedule, there isn't a team that we face that doesn't have some ability to get after the QB.

I'm wondering now if Cassel will have a single game that he surpsses 150 yards passing.

I'm wondering how many games he will finish with fewer than 100 yards.

I think that first sub-100 yard game comes this weekend against the Lions.

Curious, how many times did he exceed 150 yards last year?

OnTheWarpath15 09-14-2011 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 7909783)
Curious, how many times did he exceed 150 yards last year?

I just posted some similar numbers in the Luck thread.

Cassel has played in 32 games as a Chief, and in 18 of them he's thrown for under 200 yards.

7 of those games he threw for under 150, and 5 of them he threw for under 100.

Sickening.

NJChiefsFan 09-14-2011 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 7909795)
I just posted some similar numbers in the Luck thread.

Cassel has played in 32 games as a Chief, and in 18 of them he's thrown for under 200 yards.

7 of those games he threw for under 150, and 5 of them he threw for under 100.

Sickening.

1/6th of his games are under 100 yards. Are you ****ing kidding me!

ChiefsCountry 09-14-2011 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 7909795)
I just posted some similar numbers in the Luck thread.

Cassel has played in 32 games as a Chief, and in 18 of them he's thrown for under 200 yards.

7 of those games he threw for under 150, and 5 of them he threw for under 100.

Sickening.

Lets take Sanchez for example since he would have been the other option. He has only threw under 100 yards, twice in the same time. Last year his lowest outing was the Ravens at 74, but after that never lower than 161.

OnTheWarpath15 09-14-2011 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 7909827)
Lets take Sanchez for example since he would have been the other option. He has only threw under 100 yards, twice in the same time. Last year his lowest outing was the Ravens at 74, but after that never lower than 161.

His defense is carrying him.

lewdog 09-14-2011 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 7909795)
I just posted some similar numbers in the Luck thread.

Cassel has played in 32 games as a Chief, and in 18 of them he's thrown for under 200 yards.

7 of those games he threw for under 150, and 5 of them he threw for under 100.

Sickening.

Oh ****....I didn't realize it was that bad.....

Oh wait, yes I did.....didn't I?

Amazing to see it laid out like that. Speaks to the troubles of a team that can't play consistently (good or bad).

NJChiefsFan 09-14-2011 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 7909829)
His defense is carrying him.

Yeah his completion % isn't getting better at all. He missed Burress on a WR screen where he was wide open by 5 full yards. Sanchez tried so hard to lose that game Sunday night. The team picks him up and nobody says a word about his bad play. If he was on the Redskins, he would be labeled a bust.

MahiMike 09-15-2011 06:33 AM

We NEED to lose. This is all part of Haley's 'plan'.

the Talking Can 09-15-2011 06:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 7909795)
I just posted some similar numbers in the Luck thread.

Cassel has played in 32 games as a Chief, and in 18 of them he's thrown for under 200 yards.

7 of those games he threw for under 150, and 5 of them he threw for under 100.

Sickening.


unreal....


even designing a kiddie offense for him....

TimeForWasp 09-15-2011 07:12 AM

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/d6wRkzCW5qI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.