Baby Lee |
03-17-2012 08:20 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by KCChiefsfan50/50
(Post 8466486)
Brady Quinn has a 5 year resume in the NFL... he has failed to beat out Charlie Frye, Derek Anderson and Tim Teblow. He has been horrible whenever he's gotten the chance to play.
Based on that evidence, what are you basing your optimism on?
What?
Explain.
You are apparently one of the dumbshits who views a positive in any shitty QB the Chiefs add to the roster.
The Chiefs have managed to find one of the few QBs who is worse than Cassel.
|
**** off with your 'explain, explain, explain.'
If you paid the least amount of attention you'd already see that;
I'm only optimistic in the sense that Cassel offers ZERO, NONE, ZILCH optimism. He'll never amount to squat, his only value is comedic, and he shouldn't be in the league.
Quinn lost out to Anderson because Anderson was on what qualifies as a hot streak in the bleak wildnerness of Browns-land.
He lost out to Tebow in a PR contest with Jesus, not a skills comparison.
I also refute that he's been horrible every outing. He's no Cam Newton, but he hasn't shown futility like Cassel or Leaf.
And yes, so long as Cassel is the starter, any QB who's show even a glimmer of competence in the NFL is a step up. The closest Cassel has ever come to a glimmer is 'competently' following his coaches' strict instructions not to attempt risky passes against shitty shitty competition.
|