ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs fire Chan (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=212915)

Chiefnj2 08-31-2009 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6018771)
I wouldn't go that far.

It's called "Not Burning Bridges".

The NFL is very small clique.

I think it is called, "If I say anything they will try to fire or fine me for saying things detrimental to the team. If I keep quiet, I keep my paycheck."

Mecca 08-31-2009 02:25 PM

Yea Reid has always had an OC that designs the gameplan for him.

Chiefnj2 08-31-2009 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6018892)
I assume it will only be this year most of the guys who've become head coach and called plays after 1 year decided they didn't want to do it anymore.

At times you can judge a head coach by the coaches he surrounds himself with. Haley is 0-2 in the coordinator department.

KCrockaholic 08-31-2009 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6018916)
It just comes off like he's trying to do far to much, he can't do it alone.

Thats probably whats funny about it. I think he can handle HC and OC. But throwing on QB coach on top of it all just sounds like too much.

We have a QB coach in training though. A guy named Nick Sirianni

Brock 08-31-2009 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6018892)
I assume it will only be this year most of the guys who've become head coach and called plays after 1 year decided they didn't want to do it anymore.

He probably won't be doing it next year, because he'll probably hire an OC of his own choosing as soon as possible.

KCrockaholic 08-31-2009 02:28 PM

Luckily Todd is a hard worker. I dont think he will get lazy and not want to gameplan correctly.

Herm could have never been a HC and DC at the same time.

Mecca 08-31-2009 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 6018945)
He probably won't be doing it next year, because he'll probably hire an OC of his own choosing as soon as possible.

Then the question begs itself...why now instead of when he was hired?

Brock 08-31-2009 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6018956)
Then the question begs itself...why now instead of when he was hired?

I suspect it was because he was told he had to keep Gailey.

DaneMcCloud 08-31-2009 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 6018931)
I think it is called, "If I say anything they will try to fire or fine me for saying things detrimental to the team. If I keep quiet, I keep my paycheck."

I don't buy that.

Chan Gailey is 57 years old. He knows by now the politics involved in working the NFL.

DaneMcCloud 08-31-2009 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6018956)
Then the question begs itself...why now instead of when he was hired?

A think a reported salary in excess of $1 million dollars factored into the decision of initially retaining Gailey.

Chiefnj2 08-31-2009 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6018960)
I don't buy that.

Chan Gailey is 57 years old. He knows by now the politics involved in working the NFL.

Politics = shut up and I can keep my paycheck.

Plus, he's got the NCAA to fall back on.

Micjones 08-31-2009 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6018956)
Then the question begs itself...why now instead of when he was hired?

I suppose they wanted to take the "wait and see" approach, but I'm not sure what they really learned about him during pre-season games that don't count for anything.

This is VERY curious timing. Especially when you have just 1 week left before you need to start scheming for Game 1. This isn't a great time to move someone over to the role. I'm guessing that'll be Carthon (as a figurehead OC).

Maybe they had a big blow up?

Sweet Daddy Hate 08-31-2009 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quiet Storm (Post 6018747)
ROFL

over 7,000 posts in 3+ months?

Your mother breast fed you from a can.

Impressive isn't it?! I've actually posted the DOUBLED number of your known brain-cells, Corky!

KCrockaholic 08-31-2009 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 6018959)
I suspect it was because he was told he had to keep Gailey.

I doubt this was it... Pioli and Belichick are based off of hiring guys that jell with coaches around eachother. Pioli would have never made Haley keep Gailey if they disagreed and had different theorys.

DaneMcCloud 08-31-2009 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life (Post 6018974)
I doubt this was it... Pioli and Belichick are based off of hiring guys that jell with coaches around eachother. Pioli would have never made Haley keep Gailey if they disagreed and had different theorys.

Obviously, you don't understand the concept of multi-million dollar guaranteed contracts.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.