ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs sign Jaylon Moore 2 yrs $30M (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=357436)

kccrow 03-10-2025 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 17994614)
Gonna be honest here. Not great tape from him. Reminds me a little of Orlando struggling with outside speed at times but handling bull rushes well.

Not perfect but he has a floor and it’s way higher than anything we had last year. I would take Orlando Brown Jr back over the shit we’ve had.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Every Jaylon Moore 3rd and medium-long one-on-one True Pass set from last year.<br><br>- Consistently in the way<br>- Good latch when connected<br>- Generally balanced through set<br>- Pressed by speed &amp; length<br>- Wasn&#39;t asked to get deep up the arc<br>- Ball was out QUICK <a href="https://t.co/q1G9s7exB3">pic.twitter.com/q1G9s7exB3</a></p>&mdash; Matt Lane (@Matty_KCSN) <a href="https://twitter.com/Matty_KCSN/status/1899148774364311887?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 10, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

That's because deep up the arc is a really piss-poor deficiency of Patrick Mahomes and it stresses the **** out of his tackles. This video is pretty well picture-perfect of how OTs are trained to ride guys around a normal arc. It will be a learning curve for any OT to deal with Pat.

RunKC 03-10-2025 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FloridaMan88 (Post 17994635)
This is one of the positives with this signing... if Simmons falls late in the first round and within striking distance, the Chiefs could reasonably trade up to get him.

Justifying that move if they were paying Cam Robinson $20+ million a year would be a little more difficult.

Patella injury is extremely worrisome. Majority of players who had that injury were never the same again.

He also has really short arms. Barely 33 inches.

Pretty sure they made this move and overpaid bc they don’t like the options at LT in this draft

RunKC 03-10-2025 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 17994317)
Draft is going to be defense heavy.

I am becoming very confident that Veach is going to focus on drafting a RB early. I would imagine 63 or a trade up from 63 in the 2nd rd to get that guy bc there’s a bit of a drop off from the top handful of backs to that 2nd tier.

But yeah it will mostly be defensive, especially the first rd

dannybcaitlyn 03-10-2025 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 17994618)
Andy Heck likes what he sees!

Hopefully he picked up all the tips and trips from playing behind Trent Williams because I wouldn’t rely on Heck to pickup his game.

Rain Man 03-10-2025 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 17994671)
I am becoming very confident that Veach is going to focus on drafting a RB early. I would imagine 63 or a trade up from 63 in the 2nd rd to get that guy bc there’s a bit of a drop off from the top handful of backs to that 2nd tier.

But yeah it will mostly be defensive, especially the first rd

In my initial reading, it seems like there are a lot of running backs I like with Day 2 projections. I'm hoping we pick up one of them. I'm not averse to a Day 1 guy if they see someone they like, but it seems like Day 2 is a sweet spot based on my shallow research to date.

RealSNR 03-10-2025 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 17994637)
Really? After two starts?

I'm mystified by all of this. He was deemed a really good LT prospect. Have the Chiefs given up on him at LT or is Chiefsplanet speculating?


They’re speculating. Unless Moore is a really good LT and we extend him, they’d be foolish to consider this a long term switch for Kingsley

Palangi 03-10-2025 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 17994582)
Yay! I can't believe Veach got my dude. I didn't want Veach to break the bank on all the shit OTs in this FA class but rather take a chance on this kid developing. Honestly, it also still leaves the draft open to taking an LT if they want and maybe developing that kid for a year.

Big win for you. You called this one first. Kudos!!

pugsnotdrugs19 03-10-2025 12:45 PM

Does Elijah Mitchell, a true runner, signal that these moves are part of a greater plan to evolve into an offense that could run the football more multiple?

Andy spoke to the fact that he thought the lack of run game threat was the biggest issue in SB. Maybe that’s the fix from where he sits, and therefore the scheme fit issues become less impactful, if they do exist, as far as integrating Moore.

Mecca 03-10-2025 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 17994712)
Does Elijah Mitchell, a true runner, signal that these moves are part of a greater plan to evolve into an offense that could run the football more multiple?

Andy spoke to the fact that he thought the lack of run game threat was the biggest issue in SB. Maybe that’s the fix from where he sits, and therefore the scheme fit issues become less impactful, if they do exist, as far as integrating Moore.

I think it's a sign they realize the RB position is a problem and Pacheco's style has already caused him to start breaking down.

pugsnotdrugs19 03-10-2025 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 17994714)
I think it's a sign they realize the RB position is a problem and Pacheco's style has already caused him to start breaking down.

Yeah, but how do you also work around the possibility that Moore can’t do what they have traditionally liked their tackles to do?

You become a more serious, stable rush offense. Not all that dissimilar to what Buffalo did under Joe Brady.

Mecca 03-10-2025 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 17994717)
Yeah, but how do you also work around the possibility that Moore can’t do what they have traditionally liked their tackles to do?

You become a more serious, stable rush offense. Not all that dissimilar to what Buffalo did under Joe Brady.

If past history is anything to go off of, they'll continue to ask Moore to do things he can't do and then the fans will call him a pile of shit.

Shogun 03-10-2025 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 17994714)
I think it's a sign they realize the RB position is a problem and Pacheco's style has already caused him to start breaking down.

His injury wasn't really because of his playing style. He was running between tackles...which every single RB in the NFL does.

BWillie 03-10-2025 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 17994712)
Does Elijah Mitchell, a true runner, signal that these moves are part of a greater plan to evolve into an offense that could run the football more multiple?

Andy spoke to the fact that he thought the lack of run game threat was the biggest issue in SB. Maybe that’s the fix from where he sits, and therefore the scheme fit issues become less impactful, if they do exist, as far as integrating Moore.

I thnk that is just coachspeak and trying to throw Mahomes a bone. We were down like the entire game. We only even tried to run the ball 6 times. Our lack of running game, if that even is true, had absolutely nothing to do with our issues in the SB.

DJ's left nut 03-10-2025 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 17994639)
That's because deep up the arc is a really piss-poor deficiency of Patrick Mahomes and it stresses the **** out of his tackles. This video is pretty well picture-perfect of how OTs are trained to ride guys around a normal arc. It will be a learning curve for any OT to deal with Pat.

Maybe if more people say it, people will start listening instead of just reflexively defending him.

Man he makes it hard on his OTs.

Titty Meat 03-10-2025 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 17994749)
Maybe if more people say it, people will start listening instead of just reflexively defending him.

Man he makes it hard on his OTs.

Not allowed to call out Patrick on here some dumbass tried to use his QBR as a metric to prove his decision making wasn't poor last year

notorious 03-10-2025 01:14 PM

HE'S THE GREATEST LT TO EVER LIVE.

pugsnotdrugs19 03-10-2025 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 17994614)
Gonna be honest here. Not great tape from him. Reminds me a little of Orlando struggling with outside speed at times but handling bull rushes well.

Not perfect but he has a floor and it’s way higher than anything we had last year. I would take Orlando Brown Jr back over the shit we’ve had.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Every Jaylon Moore 3rd and medium-long one-on-one True Pass set from last year.<br><br>- Consistently in the way<br>- Good latch when connected<br>- Generally balanced through set<br>- Pressed by speed &amp; length<br>- Wasn&#39;t asked to get deep up the arc<br>- Ball was out QUICK <a href="https://t.co/q1G9s7exB3">pic.twitter.com/q1G9s7exB3</a></p>&mdash; Matt Lane (@Matty_KCSN) <a href="https://twitter.com/Matty_KCSN/status/1899148774364311887?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 10, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I counter zero no-hitters. Progress.

lcarus 03-10-2025 01:26 PM

Ive never been asked to get deep up the arc. Fortunately.

chiefzilla1501 03-10-2025 01:27 PM

Gonna disagree that this draft will be all about defense. I think veach is all in on reversing the regression on offense. I have a feeling we’re gonna go heavy on OL and also consider a RB or TE. Veach is notorious for finding FAs on 1-2 year deals while actively also trying to find their replacement. It’s unlike veach to solve his biggest issue by bandaiding it and calling it a day. Last time he overhauled the OL he bombarded this roster with draft picks (creed, trey), bandaids (Blythe) and free agency (thuney/obj).

I don’t think the value will be there in the first round for offense. But I imagine it will be in the later rounds

RunKC 03-10-2025 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 17994749)
Maybe if more people say it, people will start listening instead of just reflexively defending him.

Man he makes it hard on his OTs.

Didn’t seem to be as much of an issue in 2022. I would imagine having 5 LT’s in 2 years certainly doesn’t help though

JPH83 03-10-2025 01:34 PM

Man I'm behind, but woop, this is who I wanted!

DrunkBassGuitar 03-10-2025 01:35 PM

things were bad, now they're good! forever!

DJ's left nut 03-10-2025 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 17994784)
Didn’t seem to be as much of an issue in 2022. I would imagine having 5 LT’s in 2 years certainly doesn’t help though

No it wasn't.

That's the thing I noticed about him almost immediately in 2023 though (and, again, got railed on for saying it).

And it certainly got no better in 2024.

It's an issue that has to be addressed if he wants to get back to that premier form. He's making life much harder on himself these days than he used to. Sure - fine, blame the OT situation. It's as good a reason as any. But the critical thing is that we at least acknowledge that it's been a thing.

If he's going to get back to where he was, his playstyle needs to get back to where it was as well. And the shift from OBJr to Smith shouldn't have yielded that kind of massive step back.

A good chunk of it is just on PM.

Dunerdr 03-10-2025 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 17994717)
Yeah, but how do you also work around the possibility that Moore can’t do what they have traditionally liked their tackles to do?

You become a more serious, stable rush offense. Not all that dissimilar to what Buffalo did under Joe Brady.

Hoping this is signaling an evolution in the OL.

scho63 03-10-2025 02:04 PM

No one can bitch that Veach ain't trying to fix things on the Oline.

ChiefsCountry 03-10-2025 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scho63 (Post 17994832)
No one can bitch that Veach ain't trying to fix things on the Oline.

Never under estimate the mouth breathers of CP.

MahomesMagic 03-10-2025 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 17994792)
No it wasn't.

That's the thing I noticed about him almost immediately in 2023 though (and, again, got railed on for saying it).

And it certainly got no better in 2024.

It's an issue that has to be addressed if he wants to get back to that premier form. He's making life much harder on himself these days than he used to. Sure - fine, blame the OT situation. It's as good a reason as any. But the critical thing is that we at least acknowledge that it's been a thing.

If he's going to get back to where he was, his playstyle needs to get back to where it was as well. And the shift from OBJr to Smith shouldn't have yielded that kind of massive step back.

A good chunk of it is just on PM.


Nagy became the OC.

Balto 03-10-2025 02:24 PM

Peters clone? Both about the same measurables and both played TE until moving to OT.

Reid thinking he can catch lightning in a bottle twice at OT?

MahomesMagic 03-10-2025 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Balto (Post 17994886)
Peters clone? Both about the same measurables and both played TE until moving to OT.

Reid thinking he can catch lightning in a bottle twice at OT?



Jason Peters was an athletic unicorn.

New World Order 03-10-2025 02:35 PM

Peters clone? Both about the same measurables and both played TE until moving to OT.

Reid thinking he can catch lightning in a bottle twice at OT?

Hammock Parties 03-10-2025 02:40 PM

Reid thinking he can catch lightning in a bottle twice at OT?

Both about the same measurables and both played TE until moving to OT.

Peters clone?

-King- 03-10-2025 02:44 PM

Love it. Great deal for someone who should only get better

KC Hawks 03-10-2025 02:46 PM

Was teammates with Skyy Moore in college. The Moore you know...

Mecca 03-10-2025 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Hawks (Post 17994917)
Was teammates with Skyy Moore in college. The Moore you know...

He was teammates with Caliendo too, they played together on the same line...

TEX 03-10-2025 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahomesMagic (Post 17994859)
Nagy became the OC.

Exactly. And his stink is all over the offense.

philfree 03-10-2025 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 17994784)
Didn’t seem to be as much of an issue in 2022. I would imagine having 5 LT’s in 2 years certainly doesn’t help though

Lot's of change at WR and dropped passes and lot's of rollover at RB too. I do think Mahomes put too much pressure on himself to achieve the 3-peat as well.

ping2000 03-10-2025 03:18 PM

Why don't we hire a decent offensive line coach and get rid of POS Heck? He ****ing sucks ass.

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

staylor26 03-10-2025 03:27 PM

https://i.imgur.com/p03xWp7.png

Easy 6 03-10-2025 03:27 PM

This was really the best choice of what little was out there

Young
Ascendant, ceiling unknown
No known character concerns

Still wanna bring Humphries back so he and Suamataia can push him, keep the pressure on him and we might just get a diamond

Womble 03-10-2025 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Hawks (Post 17994917)
Was teammates with Skyy Moore in college. The Moore you know...

He'll probably end his NFL career with more TDs than Skyy Moore too.

comochiefsfan 03-10-2025 03:37 PM

I guess this is good.

If he can at least give us OBJr production then this will be a great move.

Please work out. I’m ready to see old Pat back.

Mecca 03-10-2025 03:40 PM

Ronnie Stanley has to feel stupid...had he waited till today he would have got so much more money.

RealSNR 03-10-2025 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 17994911)
Reid thinking he can catch lightning in a bottle twice at OT?

Both about the same measurables and both played TE until moving to OT.

Peters clone?


Eric Fisher also played TE in high school and a little bit of college

Bump 03-10-2025 03:55 PM

how much did he play?

I'll wait to see how he performs to voice my opinion about him

TheGuardian 03-10-2025 04:14 PM

Wasn't there quite a few guys who really wanted him?

I remember him being mentioned a lot, or at least I feel like I do, and that a lot of bros here thought he'd be the best option.

Deberg_1990 03-10-2025 04:15 PM

Jaylen Moore or Tunsil?

Pepe Silvia 03-10-2025 04:16 PM

I have to be honest I've never even heard of him.

Easy 6 03-10-2025 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 17995041)
Jaylen Moore or Tunsil?

That would've been our best bet, much preferred

But the smart money says Veach tried, and they simply weren't gonna play ball with an AFC rival

Chieftain 03-10-2025 04:27 PM

A low risk, high reward type of move. While upgrading the LT position by several double digit ratings. What's not to like?
Feels very Orlando Brown Jr like, which we would take multiple times over.

Left tackles don't grow on trees and aside from the QB, it's the hardest position to fill in the NFL. Unlike the QB, it is very rare to draft great LTs outside the top 20. In free agency, the great ones are never available. And teams would hardly ever trade the ones they got.
You have to do something and this is what you do. A smart, non-panicky acquisition of a player who looks and plays the part.

Hammock Parties 03-10-2025 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 17995006)
Eric Fisher also played TE in high school and a little bit of college

Andy Heck likes what he sees!

ThaVirus 03-10-2025 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 17994614)
Gonna be honest here. Not great tape from him. Reminds me a little of Orlando struggling with outside speed at times but handling bull rushes well.

Not perfect but he has a floor and it’s way higher than anything we had last year. I would take Orlando Brown Jr back over the shit we’ve had.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Every Jaylon Moore 3rd and medium-long one-on-one True Pass set from last year.<br><br>- Consistently in the way<br>- Good latch when connected<br>- Generally balanced through set<br>- Pressed by speed &amp; length<br>- Wasn&#39;t asked to get deep up the arc<br>- Ball was out QUICK <a href="https://t.co/q1G9s7exB3">pic.twitter.com/q1G9s7exB3</a></p>&mdash; Matt Lane (@Matty_KCSN) <a href="https://twitter.com/Matty_KCSN/status/1899148774364311887?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 10, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I’m actually encouraged. He’s got a squat build that should keep him from getting abused by bull rushes. His technique overall looks pretty good. Very little lunging or overextending trying to compensate against speed rushes.

I really like the rep at :50. That’s good hand fighting, IMO. Wanya and Kingsley would have whiffed against that quick swat from the EDGE, probably been beaten immediately for a quick sack. Instead, Moore swats back but doesn’t overextend and is able to ride the defender upfield, leaving the pocket in tact.

Mahomes will have to be disciplined in not dropping too deep. That means LG will be extremely important. If he doesn’t trust the LG, he’ll drift backward and make Moore look worse than he is.

Rain Man 03-10-2025 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pepe Silvia (Post 17995042)
I have to be honest I've never even heard of him.

He was the original Lone Ranger before getting into football.

MahomesMagic 03-10-2025 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chieftain (Post 17995058)
A low risk, high reward type of move. While upgrading the LT position by several double digit ratings. What's not to like?
Feels very Orlando Brown Jr like, which we would take multiple times over.

Left tackles don't grow on trees and aside from the QB, it's the hardest position to fill in the NFL. Unlike the QB, it is very rare to draft great LTs outside the top 20. In free agency, the great ones are never available. And teams would hardly ever trade the ones they got.
You have to do something and this is what you do. A smart, non-panicky acquisition of a player who looks and plays the part.

Once Stanley signed this was the move that made the most sense to a lot of us.

duncan_idaho 03-10-2025 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 17994989)
Ronnie Stanley has to feel stupid...had he waited till today he would have got so much more money.

Gotta figure he left at least $20M on the table.

Chris Meck 03-10-2025 05:12 PM

I like it.

I like the length of the deal, too, because if you want to move on if he doesn't work out or if Kingsley looks better in practice, you can flip him for a pick.

TheGuardian 03-10-2025 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 17995041)
Jaylen Moore or Tunsil?

moore

Rainbarrel 03-10-2025 05:35 PM

All players should come with a referee likeness rating. Unless of course they are a Kansas City Chiefs

Chieftain 03-10-2025 05:37 PM

Matt Lane is the worst Chiefs 'analyst' there is. Anything he posts should be disregared.

kccrow 03-10-2025 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pepe Silvia (Post 17995042)
I have to be honest I've never even heard of him.

How? Come on Pepe, crawl out from under your rock and join us.

Like a month ago, I said, Hey guys, this is the guy I want.
https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/show...postcount=1292

Everyone here talks about it for a week.
https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/show...357091&page=26

It has been copy-pasted by every Chiefs' wannabe news feed on the planet for the past couple of weeks as if it's some grandiose idea of their own.

BWillie 03-10-2025 06:17 PM

This guy will help us win two more Super Bowls!

FloridaMan88 03-10-2025 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 17995276)
This guy will help us win two more Super Bowls!

The bar for LT play for the Chiefs to win a Super Bowl is Eric Fisher/OBJ/Donovan Smith.

That isn’t exactly Willie Roaf territory.

smithandrew051 03-10-2025 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 17994989)
Ronnie Stanley has to feel stupid...had he waited till today he would have got so much more money.

What about Alaric Jackson?

He might’ve had the best market of any of them.

DJ's left nut 03-10-2025 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smithandrew051 (Post 17995284)
What about Alaric Jackson?

He might’ve had the best market of any of them.

Yeah - Jackson ****ed up BIGGLY.

Stanley has age and durability concerns that might've held back his value on the market. I don't think he'd have killed what he got even in this market.

Jackson would've had a stronger market than Dan Moore and potentially by a fair bit. Could've gotten another couple million a year and maybe even another year if he wanted it.

I just don't understand how anybody (Bolton included) would play their way to FA status and then not at least test the market. He had to have seen the amount of available cap out there.

He may have left $50 million on the table.

TwistedChief 03-10-2025 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 17995038)
Wasn't there quite a few guys who really wanted him?

I remember him being mentioned a lot, or at least I feel like I do, and that a lot of bros here thought he'd be the best option.

Weren't there some people who comically bitched about Veach's lack of "cooking" in free agency before free agency even began?

smithandrew051 03-10-2025 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 17995294)
Yeah - Jackson ****ed up BIGGLY.

Stanley has age and durability concerns that might've held back his value on the market. I don't think he'd have killed what he got even in this market.

Jackson would've had a stronger market than Dan Moore and potentially by a fair bit. Could've gotten another couple million a year and maybe even another year if he wanted it.

I just don't understand how anybody (Bolton included) would play their way to FA status and then not at least test the market. He had to have seen the amount of available cap out there.

He may have left $50 million on the table.

Dan Moore got what? 4/$82?

Jackson easily could’ve gotten 4/$88 then, right?

I was 100% on board with Jackson at 4/$80.

He needs to fire that agent.

Couch-Potato 03-10-2025 06:39 PM

https://www.reddit.com/r/KansasCityC...ging/#lightbox

~“PFF numbers are excellent…Last 3 seasons: 681 snaps, 4 sacks, 0 penalties. Last season’s blocking grade of 73 is higher than any Chiefs offensive lineman over the last two seasons.”

Very promising, indeed.

staylor26 03-10-2025 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 17995299)
Weren't there some people who comically bitched about Veach's lack of "cooking" in free agency before free agency even began?

LMAO

GordonGekko 03-10-2025 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Couch-Potato (Post 17995302)
https://www.reddit.com/r/KansasCityC...ging/#lightbox

~“PFF numbers are excellent…Last 3 seasons: 681 snaps, 4 sacks, 0 penalties. Last season’s blocking grade of 73 is higher than any Chiefs offensive lineman over the last two seasons.”

Very promising, indeed.

Excellent news, a young-ish tackle who learned from the master LT in SF. 0 penalties as well, hopefully he continues that w/ the Chiefs

Pepe Silvia 03-10-2025 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 17995270)
How? Come on Pepe, crawl out from under your rock and join us.

Like a month ago, I said, Hey guys, this is the guy I want.
https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/show...postcount=1292

Everyone here talks about it for a week.
https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/show...357091&page=26

It has been copy-pasted by every Chiefs' wannabe news feed on the planet for the past couple of weeks as if it's some grandiose idea of their own.

Thanks for the Monday Update.

kccrow 03-10-2025 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 17995294)
Yeah - Jackson ****ed up BIGGLY.

Stanley has age and durability concerns that might've held back his value on the market. I don't think he'd have killed what he got even in this market.

Jackson would've had a stronger market than Dan Moore and potentially by a fair bit. Could've gotten another couple million a year and maybe even another year if he wanted it.

I just don't understand how anybody (Bolton included) would play their way to FA status and then not at least test the market. He had to have seen the amount of available cap out there.

He may have left $50 million on the table.

I don't know if he did **** up per se`. You look at 57.5/3 vs 82/4 and it's just as simple as adding a 3rd year at 25m to Alaric's deal. The Rams can get out of the deal after 2 years, so that helps them. Alaric hits the market again at 28 going on 29, which means one more likely big payday, so he's also betting more on himself.

Was Alaric worth a bit more on the open market? Maybe. I think he might have got a bit more, something like 21-22m AAV on the open market. If Alaric does really well on this deal, he might be gaining a lot more than 6m on his next deal.

pugsnotdrugs19 03-10-2025 06:49 PM

One of the best parts of this deal is it essentially gives the Chiefs two years to find and develop a LTOTF, if BPA calls for it.

They could go LT at any of their first picks in the next couple years, not be forced to play the kid if they need the time.

Dunerdr 03-10-2025 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chieftain (Post 17995222)
Matt Lane is the worst Chiefs 'analyst' there is. Anything he posts should be disregared.

He’s not that bad normally but is insufferable during free agency and the draft. If it’s not a guy he wanted he’s just going to slick hate for two weeks. He’s got little man syndrome but he’s not little. And it’s funny that people think he’s small purely because of his attitude.

Bump 03-10-2025 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Couch-Potato (Post 17995302)
https://www.reddit.com/r/KansasCityC...ging/#lightbox

~“PFF numbers are excellent…Last 3 seasons: 681 snaps, 4 sacks, 0 penalties. Last season’s blocking grade of 73 is higher than any Chiefs offensive lineman over the last two seasons.”

Very promising, indeed.

good to hear. It's not a huge risk anyways with a 2 year deal.

I was actually thinking they should look at the leagues best LT's and see who their backups are because they probably didn't get many opportunities.

kccrow 03-10-2025 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 17995313)
One of the best parts of this deal is it essentially gives the Chiefs two years to find and develop a LTOTF, if BPA calls for it.

They could go LT at any of their first picks in the next couple years, not be forced to play the kid if they need the time.

This is exactly what drew me to like the idea. You get a guy who can hold down the fort and will likely not be any worse than Cam Robinson or Dan Moore Jr, who have been, let's face it folks, relatively subpar at best and cost far more for lengthier terms.

Most of the OTs in this class are going to need some seasoning before they can play meaningful snaps. That doesn't mean you don't take one even in round 1, but it takes some pressure off and lets you develop a guy a little bit before casting him into the fire.

Even with this signing, I remain on the draft Conerly hype train in round 1. If Jaylon Moore works out at LT, you can always move Conerly to RT to take over for Taylor, it's just going to take a bit of time for him to acclimate. Conerly is going to need some development in the strength and anchor department anyhow but he's got all the other tools you want. If you can't get him, you can look at another project or wait until 2026 to get a prospect.

Chris Meck 03-10-2025 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 17995372)
This is exactly what drew me to like the idea. You get a guy who can hold down the fort and will likely not be any worse than Cam Robinson or Dan Moore Jr, who have been, let's face it folks, relatively subpar at best and cost far more for lengthier terms.

Most of the OTs in this class are going to need some seasoning before they can play meaningful snaps. That doesn't mean you don't take one even in round 1, but it takes some pressure off and lets you develop a guy a little bit before casting him into the fire.

Even with this signing, I remain on the draft Conerly hype train in round 1. If Jaylon Moore works out at LT, you can always move Conerly to RT to take over for Taylor, it's just going to take a bit of time for him to acclimate. Conerly is going to need some development in the strength and anchor department anyhow but he's got all the other tools you want. If you can't get him, you can look at another project or wait until 2026 to get a prospect.

Well, and/or for that matter, it's too early to give up on Kingsley. He's got all of the physical tools.

JohnnyHammersticks 03-10-2025 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smithandrew051 (Post 17995300)
Dan Moore got what? 4/$82?

Jackson easily could’ve gotten 4/$88 then, right?

I was 100% on board with Jackson at 4/$80.

He needs to fire that agent.

If I played in the NFL I'd have been calling Tershawn Wharton's agent the second the ink dried on that Carolina contract.

I think Wharton is a very solid player, but his agent is HOF-caliber for getting him a contract like that.

Chieftain 03-10-2025 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 17995372)
Conerly is going to need some development in the strength and anchor department anyhow but he's got all the other tools you want. If you can't get him, you can look at another project or wait until 2026 to get a prospect.

Not being able to anchor properly is a major criticism of his. I don't know if that's a teachable thing. Certainly a big red flag imo that might not be worth the risk.

kccrow 03-10-2025 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 17995375)
Well, and/or for that matter, it's too early to give up on Kingsley. He's got all of the physical tools.

While I agree with you on the traits, I don't know if that's a universal thought. Most draft pundits a year ago didn't see him as a LT, they thought he might work out as a RT. That sticks in my brain a bit. The Chiefs have also been pretty clear about their desire to play him at LG, from week 18 through the offseason so far. Most players that end up going to OG from OT don't end up back at OT. I don't recall an instance of it, although I'm sure it's happened in the annals of time.

Unless the Chiefs give me a reason to think otherwise, I'm of the thought that Kingsley will be our starting LG from here on out.

Mecca 03-10-2025 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chieftain (Post 17995222)
Matt Lane is the worst Chiefs 'analyst' there is. Anything he posts should be disregared.

Weird I think Lane is the best of them.

DJ's left nut 03-10-2025 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chieftain (Post 17995388)
Not being able to anchor properly is a major criticism of his. I don't know if that's a teachable thing. Certainly a big red flag imo that might not be worth the risk.

It is if you have the feet for it.

People look at strength when they talk about anchor, but a lot of that is having light feet and good balance.

Conerly does seem to have both those things. He just lacks the functional strength to pull it all together.

That's the EASIEST of those three ingredients to add.

But I still don't see me wanting him over the DL in this class.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.