![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I like the inside the locker room bits Taylor brings about 5 times per season, and Keysor knows X's and O's well enough. Briscoe is an obnoxious douche who thinks he's the smartest guy in the room.
That podcast is good when they are actually talking about football (so only Nate and Seth), but when they are doing their ridiculous ad libs, annoying screechy voices, and going on non football tangents...yuck. |
Man, that was painful to listen to.
|
Quote:
That was easily - EASILY - the worst show they've ever done even going back to their early Time's Ours day. FFS the last 5 minutes were Brisco talking about his goddamn birdfeeder. It was horrible. If that were my introduction to that show, I'd have never even given it a 2nd chance. If they insist on doing 2 episodes a week in the off-season and THAT'S the caliber of episode they're going to put out...don't. |
Nate Taylor…goodness. This is insane.
“To hell and back”…uhh yeah. Being falsely accused of a horrendous crime and having your dream ripped away from you is about right. Dude’s life was almost ruined. He kept saying that Araiza “technically wasn’t there”. Technically? All evidence says he wasn’t there. What’s this “technically” qualifier? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I’m no attorney or judge, but I’d say someone not even being in the building during that is pretty ****ing important. |
Quote:
They’re getting destroyed in the comments though. Deservedly so. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Because all I know is he wasn't there at the time this supposedly happened. Why would you throw shade on the guy? |
I still generally like those guys, but I agree that that episode was...rough. More broadly, it feels like they've leaned into the slap-happy schtick a little too much this year (and since becoming OWG). Some episodes have just been hard to watch because they're just pure chaos. The one with Nate on radio row during Super Bowl week was a mess.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I might be on board with that, except that all the evidence shows Araiza wasn’t even in the house. It’s not like there just wasn’t enough evidence. As far as we know, the evidence proves he’s innocent. |
Quote:
Being an idiot and sticking your dick in a (underage) crazy rando in the back yard of a party is not comparable to the alleged/debunked gangrape. But it does show poor judgement. Let's hope he's learned his lesson and is a better person for it. |
Quote:
And he runs a 4.8… fake punt potential. |
Quote:
It’s not like he met her at the Scholastic Book Fair or something. |
They don't think he's a team player now. Because it looked legit at the time?
|
Quote:
And lets be honest - the first thing freshman boys do is find and bang HS girls that will for once bang them. I don't know a single human male that was single and didn't throw a chip in that dip. I know a ton of guys at Rolla that didn't lose their cherry until St. Pat's day - when the HS girls flocked in. |
Quote:
I worked at a restaurant in college, one of the hostesses was a high school 17 year old and all of the guys thought she was hot but too young obviously. Well one time I was out at the club and she was there with a fake ID. You have to be 21 to enter that place. She was like "hey bump! woohoo!' and I was like "what in the **** are you doing here? please leave" and she was like "**** you bump!" and so whenever I saw a guy hitting on her I made sure to inform them that she was in high school. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Glad to hear otherwise. It won't mean anything. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
More casual listeners were brutal. Hopefully those comments haven’t been suppressed. |
Quote:
Ive listened to these guys since episode 1 of Times Ours but if they don't eat a great big shit sandwich on their next episode, I'm out. This is 3 straight weeks of wholly unacceptable 'content'. It's been really, REALLY bad and honestly reflects poorly on all of KCSN if Tucker, Craig and Matt don't demand they fall on their swords next week. If nothing else they have to stop doing this live. They clearly aren't equipped for it. |
Gaining huge advantages in the pros where everyone is elite is very difficult. This means that acquiring players to gain as many edges as possible, no matter how slight, is very important. This is a good signing for the Chiefs.
|
Quote:
|
Tommy T. Thank you! You got 2 SB rings now get paid else where! BYE! :thumb:
|
Good bye Tommy Townsend and hello Matt Araiza :thumb:
Here is what we are getting for the future minus T. Townsend who reaches for $$$$$ Oh he tackles too? <iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/OafZBFXyg-M?si=HWY9NGvImAgmfQGQ" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
I just had a weird hallucination as I was scrolling this thread that fans of a team that always makes deep runs in the playoffs, who lived through the kicker who shall remain nameless, and a bunch of other playoff kicking mishaps, were considering the idea of getting rid of one of the most clutch postseason kickers of all time to save a few bucks.
I need to lie down now until the swamp vapors pass. |
this team next year is going to be like the globetrotters against the generals...
the stars are aligned :D |
Quote:
I agree with the other posters about Times Ours/Only Weird games. I used to love that show, and still really like all those guys as they seem like good dudes. But the signal to noise ratio has gotten worse and worse. One 45 minute show a week in the off-season would be enough. They need to learn that a little goes a long way on stuff like Seth getting sidetracked, laughing at each other w/o saying anything, Nate's bits where no one knows where he's going and it just goes on and on and on, etc. And wtf Brisco, leave Bolton alone. The dude's a great player. Remember when you were apoplectic about us letting Bashaud Breeland go? And Fenton to a lesser degree? Looks like the team knew what they were doing. I trust the coaches if they tell us Bolton is doing a ton of little things that set the other players up for success. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
What ****ing questions? The guy was cleared. |
Quote:
Really?!? How about this: “A bank teller sued Nate Taylor for emotional distress and putting a gun in her face when he robbed the bank with Chiefsaholic. The US Attorney’s office declined to prosecute because video of the robbery showed he was not there at the time so Nate Taylor has technically been cleared but questions remain.” They also complained that this woman’s lawyer said they dropped the case because she couldn’t afford the legal fees for the counter-suit. That is a load of crap. Representing her on the counter-suit is part and parcel of representing her as a plaintiff. It’s covered by the contingency. The lawyer will keep track of fees related to that for purposes of damages if she wins the lawsuit but you don’t drop the case because of that. You drop the case because it’s a dead-bang loser and you know it. You use the “legal fees” excuse tags a way to cover your ass. The latest episode really pissed me off. They ask how KC fans are supposed to feel when Araiza booms a punt that pins an opposing team deep in their territory? I’m going to feel great that our team can avail themselves of his services after he was falsely accused of a crime, after he’s been to hell and back. |
Po<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/2Z7SafOiCXM?si=FPRAamelE9OZ41mD" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Since he's exonerated, it gives us the excuse to use this dandy when Araiza punts |
Quote:
|
Butker can’t never leave, he’s almost as dangerous as Hill was for us. The fact he can consistently make 55+ is a difference maker
|
Given the egregious history concerning Punt God, CP, and me, I'll just pop in and say good signing and leave it at that. :)
|
Quote:
Then I'm probably done listening to them at least until football season starts again. |
People please, we have Buttkicker and now Matt Ariaza? Really? This is HAPPENING! Accept it! We just got better on special teams for the win!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
What do you think is unlikely to translate? (We can even put aside the fact that the real trade off is Araiza + 3mm/4mm of cap room per over the next 4yrs vs Townsend.) |
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The man? No. Not at all. Not even close. No. No. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The only thing you worry about is holding kicks for Butker. Assuming the Chiefs are confident in his ability to do that well. |
Quote:
|
This guy is a great punter. Tommy had a great SB moment but he was
Wad bottom half in 23. |
Quote:
|
Everyone has a different opinion but I feel like Seth carries that show. Nate the insider has very little quality insider info imo. Last year he said theres absolutely no way Orlando Brown would walk. Its purely just him speculating that the Chiefs were going to run back the super bowl roster. The chiefs not only didn't bring him back but drew a firm line in the sand and were comfortable signing a late offseason tackle to replace him.
Seth carries the show imo. He's not a 10/10 but he's willing to admit hes wrong and that he fan boys for some players. Another quality host with actual football back ground would probably go a long way. A show with Craig Stout, Seth and one other person with some knowledge and the ability to move them along would probably be pretty damn good. Both of those guys will readily admit they don't know it all and that its a hobby but are willing to learn. Brisco just irratates me because he knows jack shit about football but will just take a hard stand on stupid shit like a radio host does. |
Taking on rehab projects is an Andy thing. Most recently Toney. Reid took on Michael Vick(I don't recall the Karen shit storm, but wow). Sure Vick worked out for him, it was a huge risk. I'd say very Christian move, but that's a shit typhoon
|
Quote:
He was an average punter who had one great year. He may have another great year at some point soon but in the end, his 4 year track record shows 3 mediocre years (including his most recent one) and one excellent one. Sure looks like the excellent one is the outlier, no? He's...fine. He's no sort of problem at the position and not a genuine asset either. He's a JAG. He's as replaceable as they get. And for all the "Oh my god, can Araiza hold!?!?" stuff, people were WRECKING Townsends holding until he got one damn high snap down in a SB. He's as likely as not to duff the next one. There's just no reason at all to bemoan the loss of Tommy Townsend and I was hoping they'd let him walk this off-season before we signed Araiza. Not because he's a liability, but because he's just not an asset and we were going to have to pay him as though he were. Townsend is well on his way to being forgotten about. The same as 90% of other punters in the league. |
Quote:
He's legit. He knows his shit. He's the only one of any of them I actually learn from. Seth will show me stuff I occasionally miss because he's good at video clipping and he's articulate. So he'll see something I overlooked and mention it. So he brings things to my attention. Stout, OTOH, will flat out teach me things I didn't know or understand. |
This is why I love CP. Where else can I find a 20 page thread on a punter?
|
Quote:
|
Such a Veachy move!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I really like AHPKC. They don't do deep play analysis like the Lab, but come up with some pretty good stats, and are just really entertaining and professional imo. I always feel like I'm in good hands with them, whereas I never know when OWG is going to go completely off the rails. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
User CP/edit options/thread display options/number of posts to show per page. The max is 80. You're welcome. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Whether you find value in that is the question. I generally find them to be an easy listen. |
Quote:
|
Townsend may have cost us $6 million. We save $5 M cap space and get a potentially better punter. Great move.
|
Quote:
Eh. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Meanwhile the lab guys are looking at matchups and schemes and seeing specific places the Chiefs could take advantage. They see where the path to victory is, acknowledge the statistics, but point to what built those statistics. |
Quote:
<iframe src="https://giphy.com/embed/tvGOBZKNEX0ac" width="480" height="204" frameBorder="0" class="giphy-embed" allowFullScreen></iframe><p><a href="https://giphy.com/gifs/mrw-coffee-wants-tvGOBZKNEX0ac">via GIPHY</a></p> |
Quote:
Their shows are usually about 45 minutes, which is about what OWG would be if you just took the content and stripped out all the grab-assery. They're also the ones who looked at team DVOA in Tom Brady's championship seasons with the Pats, and found it wasn't correlated much at all with the Patriot's top regular season DVOA over those 17 years. I thought that was really interesting. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Interestingly, looks like Brisco is leaving 810.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Personal news!<br>Thank you so much for listening. <a href="https://t.co/uyg5OfyAhU">pic.twitter.com/uyg5OfyAhU</a></p>— Joshua Brisco (@jbbrisco) <a href="https://twitter.com/jbbrisco/status/1762294895589330988?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 27, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:57 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.