![]() |
I don't care about 0-4 in the preseason, but I'm concerned about...
... our #1 D looking lost in the first couple of drives of each game. I saw that in some regular season games as well last year and I hope it's not become a KC Chiefs signature.
As improved as we are on paper we cannot afford to start getting it together 14 points behind with the regular season opponents we will have. Thoughts? |
I'm still on the 11-5+ bandwagon.
|
5+:spock:
|
Playing possom
|
16-0
|
Quote:
|
Frankie thread. Doomed before it ever started. Frankie bashers in 3, ... 2, ... 1, ...
|
I'm a little concerned about the team breaking in half midseason.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'm concerned that Frankie doesn't look like John from Garfield. That's how I've always pictured him.
|
Quote:
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-V3VbfaAi7h...600/jon_bd.jpg |
Quote:
4-12, nothing more. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
There's no way in hell we lose more than 5 of these games.
|
I always pictured 4th and long to look like a hairless Yogi Bear. I hope I'm right.
|
Quote:
|
So you have decided a 13-3 season.
Thanks fans. |
Guys, please stay on task and talk only about the thread topic posted
|
Hi, I doubt any of you have been following the Chargers, but our Run D is atrocious.
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Stay on task? If Haley can pull us into the playoffs, I'm holding the next Planet bash. Burnt ends for everybody!
|
Quote:
|
The thing that can save us this year is our division. Even with a shitty record I think we can win it again, cause the rest of our division will be pretty bad. We may be last year's Seahawks.
|
Quote:
I know Garay is a good player. |
will the earthquake cause the mighty Mo to run backwards?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Garay has been out. Hopefully when he comes back we improve. Posted via Mobile Device |
My concern after watching that early drive is that teams will target Studebaker at the LOLB position all year long in the run game. They need to get Houston or Sheffield on the field early and often. That's what I see as really the only vulnerable spot on the field now.
Offensively, I've relaxed a little. They looked I thought a good deal better than the last three weeks, even in the stalled first drive, and I think they might just be okay against Buffalo, which was I believe what Haley's intention was. But we'll see. Only time will tell. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
i thought jackson looked like his usual puss self...i didn't catch much of the 2nd half... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Seems pretty clear to me that when you have Studebaker & Jackson on the same side, that screams to me weak link and teams are taking advantage of it.
I think Houston will replace Studebaker soon enough so I'm not too concerned about that. But Tyson, wow. Really missing Shaun Smith right about now. |
That's something that has been bothering me as well. We are not built to come from behind every game. That shit needs to be fixed asap. The only lproblem is I don't think you can fix it in one week.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I think that the d getting gouged just goes to show that in the NFL, one blown assignment or missed gap can lead to a big gain. I know we didn't quite have the preaseason we wanted but it is steal preseason
|
Quote:
But this thing about falling into an early hole is a bad trend with the Chiefs that goes back a few years with us. I want to see our D come out aware and clicking at the very beginning of the games. A little frustrating when they seem to sleepwalk through the first couple of enemy drives. |
Why do people keep saying our division sucks? Yeah, the Donkeys suck, but that's about it.
SD has Vincent Jackson and Antonio Gates back healthy. Phillip Rivers is an Elite QB. Chiefs fans, it's time for you guys to accept it. As long as Rivers is in the Division, the Chargers will always be a division contender. Oakland Returns with #2 Rushing Offense in the NFL and they pounded the division last year .... Yeah, Denver, you suck. It's going to take 11 wins to take the division, at least. |
Quote:
Our division always plays us tough. I remember when SD was 1-15 and we were their one and only win. They play us hard no matter what. But I don't think anyone in our division will fare as well against the rest of the schedule. I would be pretty shocked if anyone in the AFC west gets 11 wins this year. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
<table style="width: 366px; height: 77px;" class="data-table1" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"><td class="first ">11</td><td nowrap="true"> Nov 21</td><td nowrap="true"> KC @ NE </td><td>Gillette Stadium</td><td>8:30 PM </td><td nowrap="true"> </td><td class=""> </td></tr><tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"><td class="first ">12</td><td nowrap="true"> Nov 27</td><td nowrap="true"> PIT @ KC </td><td>Arrowhead Stadium</td><td>8:20 PM </td><td nowrap="true"> </td><td class=""> </td></tr><tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"><td class="first ">13</td><td nowrap="true"> Dec 04</td><td nowrap="true"> KC @ CHI </td><td>Soldier Field</td><td>1:00 PM </td><td nowrap="true"> </td><td class=""> </td></tr><tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"><td class="first ">14</td><td nowrap="true"> Dec 11</td><td nowrap="true"> KC @ NYJ </td><td>MetLife Stadium</td><td>1:00 PM </td><td nowrap="true"> </td><td class=""> </td></tr><tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"><td class="first ">15</td><td nowrap="true"> Dec 18</td><td nowrap="true"> GB @ KC </td><td>Arrowhead Stadium</td><td>1:00 PM </td><td nowrap="true"> </td></tr></tbody></table> |
I think they lose all 5 of those games.
|
Quote:
I think too many people (and I don't mean you when I'm saying this, just making a general comment...) are expecting the wrong thing from our d-line. This is not the Cowboys defense, these guys are not busting upfield to make plays in the backfield. That's just not their role. And I think failing to grasp that is what leads to so many people (starting with the media) complaining about Jackson and (I'm expecting...) Gregg and even Dorsey. Not taking down ball carriers in the backfield and not sacking quarterbacks does not mean they're playing poorly. Because, basically, the only time they get to go after guys is when a blocking assignment is completely whiffed. The rest of the time it's boring old trench work. Now if they get blown off the ball, that's another story. But most of the time their job is about holding people up so the linebackers are free to do their thing. And unfortunately, Studebaker doesn't appear to be able to do that a lot of the time. He's not very agile or quick laterally, he doesn't have any speed in pursuit and he doesn't have the experience and knowledge that in the past let Vrabel compensate (to a degree) for those same limitations. I think we're going to see a lot of people targetting the left side of the defense this year, and while some of that may well be Jackson (he's not Dorsey...), I think the real weak link is Stude. Too many running plays this preseason have been stalled at the line, and then taken outside where he doesn't have the speed to cut them off before they get the corner. |
Quote:
Will they? Doubtful. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Both Sheff and Houston's styles are more aggressive than Studey's. Though as non-starters they had little involvement in the 1st couple of drives once they are in they have to learn to protect against overplaying the rush. |
I need to see Houston and The Sheriff play better in run support before I go crying that Studebaker should be benched.
|
If Buffalo gains 20+ yards on an off-tackle run to the right on their opening play I'm gonna huck a rock through my TV.
|
Quote:
As for the edge runs I can see what you are saying. Especially our left side. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The Bake has done nothing to establish himself, and is being outplayed by his back-ups. Why not let Houston/Sheffield get some time in with the 1's? It's a two-parter: Same exact thing, except regarding Jackson/Gilberry/Bailey. The left side has consistently shown problems all preseason when those guys are in there. |
Quote:
|
I'm concerned about your mother's vagina. her ass is perfectly fine, but her vagina is rather...how do the kids say these days... stank. hey, that rhymes with skank! :)
|
Quote:
;):evil: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I mean, if I was feeling creative, I could break out a burqa joke. I could make another geriatric comment. I could make a suicide bomber joke. the material is endless, yet I revert to the old stuff? I'm disappointed in me too. :( |
Quote:
|
damn, man. I KNEW you reminded me of gollum!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I am unable to predect the future of the NFL like you guys... Shit its a long season and I cant predict injuries, games and stats... So All I can say is I am glad they can actually play the games, otherwise you guys would just fold the team permanently out of fear... |
Quote:
Quote:
And in the end, if it's about a young guy learning, I will take overpursuit over not able to reach the play 7 days a week and twice on Sunday. But that's just me. Call it the price of doing business |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
See me world. Kill the dissenter. |
Quote:
Not that it matters in the big picture of things, but Sheffield, in the first three preseason games has played better in run support than Studebaker. But Studebaker offers you nothing at that spot. Both Houston and Shef are far more athletic and faster and will make more plays by accident than Studebaker will by design. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:54 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.