ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs I don't care about 0-4 in the preseason, but I'm concerned about... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=249379)

Frankie 09-01-2011 09:56 PM

I don't care about 0-4 in the preseason, but I'm concerned about...
 
... our #1 D looking lost in the first couple of drives of each game. I saw that in some regular season games as well last year and I hope it's not become a KC Chiefs signature.

As improved as we are on paper we cannot afford to start getting it together 14 points behind with the regular season opponents we will have.

Thoughts?

KurtCobain 09-01-2011 09:57 PM

I'm still on the 11-5+ bandwagon.

007 09-01-2011 09:58 PM

5+:spock:

L.A. Chieffan 09-01-2011 09:58 PM

Playing possom

SPchief 09-01-2011 09:58 PM

16-0

SPchief 09-01-2011 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 7872840)
5+:spock:

First round playoff loss

4th and Long 09-01-2011 09:59 PM

Frankie thread. Doomed before it ever started. Frankie bashers in 3, ... 2, ... 1, ...

Bugeater 09-01-2011 10:00 PM

I'm a little concerned about the team breaking in half midseason.

4th and Long 09-01-2011 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 7872862)
I'm a little concerned about the team breaking in half midseason.

Thanks for not disappointing.

SPchief 09-01-2011 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 7872862)
I'm a little concerned about the team breaking in half midseason.

Subtle, yet funny

007 09-01-2011 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPchief (Post 7872850)
First round playoff loss

ahhhhh :thumb:

4th and Long 09-01-2011 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 7872828)
I don't care about 0-4 in the preseason, but I'm concerned about...

Anal warts? :shrug:

Simply Red 09-01-2011 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4th and Long (Post 7872851)
Frankie thread. Doomed before it ever started. Frankie bashers in 3, ... 2, ... 1, ...

Frankie likes the pain.

KurtCobain 09-01-2011 10:12 PM

I'm concerned that Frankie doesn't look like John from Garfield. That's how I've always pictured him.

4th and Long 09-01-2011 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KurtCobain (Post 7872927)
I'm concerned that Frankie doesn't look like John from Garfield. That's how I've always pictured him.

It's Jon, actually.
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-V3VbfaAi7h...600/jon_bd.jpg

Extra Point 09-01-2011 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KurtCobain (Post 7872836)
I'm still on the 11-5+ bandwagon.

No, you're still on meth, little buddy. De-friend me, if you want. No skin off my ass.

4-12, nothing more.

KurtCobain 09-01-2011 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Extra Point (Post 7872930)
No, you're still on meth, little buddy. De-friend me, if you want. No skin off my ass.

4-12, nothing more.

Can't wait to pull this up right before the playoff game.

4th and Long 09-01-2011 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Extra Point (Post 7872930)
No, you're still on meth, little buddy. De-friend me, if you want. No skin off my ass.

4-12, nothing more.

SHAMEY ON YOUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!

KurtCobain 09-01-2011 10:15 PM

There's no way in hell we lose more than 5 of these games.

KurtCobain 09-01-2011 10:16 PM

I always pictured 4th and long to look like a hairless Yogi Bear. I hope I'm right.

Extra Point 09-01-2011 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4th and Long (Post 7872943)
SHAMEY ON YOUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!

4th, you're the one I most revere, here. nuff said.

Smed1065 09-01-2011 10:20 PM

So you have decided a 13-3 season.

Thanks fans.

SPchief 09-01-2011 10:21 PM

Guys, please stay on task and talk only about the thread topic posted

Buck 09-01-2011 10:22 PM

Hi, I doubt any of you have been following the Chargers, but our Run D is atrocious.
Posted via Mobile Device

Smed1065 09-01-2011 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck (Post 7872976)
Hi, I doubt any of you have been following the Chargers, but our Run D is atrocious.
Posted via Mobile Device

So we have a chance......

KurtCobain 09-01-2011 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck (Post 7872976)
Hi, I doubt any of you have been following the Chargers, but our Run D is atrocious.
Posted via Mobile Device

You guys are toast this year.

4th and Long 09-01-2011 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Extra Point (Post 7872965)
4th, you're the one I most revere, here. nuff said.

I do not begrudge your opinion, my friend. My previuos post was filled with Kool-Aid and Homerism. I saw the last Superbowl we were in, and won. I'm still waiting for the next one.

Extra Point 09-01-2011 10:24 PM

Stay on task? If Haley can pull us into the playoffs, I'm holding the next Planet bash. Burnt ends for everybody!

4th and Long 09-01-2011 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPchief (Post 7872972)
Guys, please stay on task and talk only about the thread topic posted

Your Mother's ass.

ForeverChiefs58 09-01-2011 11:01 PM

The thing that can save us this year is our division. Even with a shitty record I think we can win it again, cause the rest of our division will be pretty bad. We may be last year's Seahawks.

Hammock Parties 09-01-2011 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck (Post 7872976)
Hi, I doubt any of you have been following the Chargers, but our Run D is atrocious.
Posted via Mobile Device

Liuget not working out?

I know Garay is a good player.

Psyko Tek 09-01-2011 11:10 PM

will the earthquake cause the mighty Mo to run backwards?

BossChief 09-02-2011 01:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck (Post 7872976)
Hi, I doubt any of you have been following the Chargers, but our Run D is atrocious.
Posted via Mobile Device

Just like they were before Ron Rivera was brought in?

Frankie 09-02-2011 01:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck (Post 7872976)
Hi, I doubt any of you have been following the Chargers, but our Run D is atrocious.
Posted via Mobile Device

Ours has been worse than atrocious for the first two drives. Then something happens and they wake up. But like I said, as a Chiefs fan I'm truly worried about that little habit.

Buck 09-02-2011 02:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7873148)
Liuget not working out?

I know Garay is a good player.

Liuget has looked good against the pass, but not the run.

Garay has been out. Hopefully when he comes back we improve.
Posted via Mobile Device

keg in kc 09-02-2011 03:51 AM

My concern after watching that early drive is that teams will target Studebaker at the LOLB position all year long in the run game. They need to get Houston or Sheffield on the field early and often. That's what I see as really the only vulnerable spot on the field now.

Offensively, I've relaxed a little. They looked I thought a good deal better than the last three weeks, even in the stalled first drive, and I think they might just be okay against Buffalo, which was I believe what Haley's intention was. But we'll see. Only time will tell.

Hancock 09-02-2011 05:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KurtCobain (Post 7872836)
I'm still on the 11-5+ bandwagon.

6-10. Last years cupcake schedule is past, and Weiss is gone. Plus no injuries last year and several guys had career/last gasp years. This still is not a very good team.

xfactor 09-02-2011 06:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPchief (Post 7872844)
16-0

19 and 0!!!!!!!

Tribal Warfare 09-02-2011 06:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck (Post 7873359)
Liuget has looked good against the pass, but not the run.

Garay has been out. Hopefully when he comes back we improve.
Posted via Mobile Device

How about Cam Thomas?

the Talking Can 09-02-2011 06:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 7873372)
My concern after watching that early drive is that teams will target Studebaker at the LOLB position all year long in the run game. They need to get Houston or Sheffield on the field early and often. That's what I see as really the only vulnerable spot on the field now.

Offensively, I've relaxed a little. They looked I thought a good deal better than the last three weeks, even in the stalled first drive, and I think they might just be okay against Buffalo, which was I believe what Haley's intention was. But we'll see. Only time will tell.

is it stude or jackson or both?

i thought jackson looked like his usual puss self...i didn't catch much of the 2nd half...

TEX 09-02-2011 06:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 7872828)
... our #1 D looking lost in the first couple of drives of each game. I saw that in some regular season games as well last year and I hope it's not become a KC Chiefs signature.

As improved as we are on paper we cannot afford to start getting it together 14 points behind with the regular season opponents we will have.

Thoughts?

The Chiefs are soft against the run. Gonna be a long season if they can't fix it. People will say stuff like,"If it wasn't for that 1 long run we'd have been ok." Problem is they will be saying it every game.

TEX 09-02-2011 06:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 7873372)
My concern after watching that early drive is that teams will target Studebaker at the LOLB position all year long in the run game. They need to get Houston or Sheffield on the field early and often. That's what I see as really the only vulnerable spot on the field now.

Offensively, I've relaxed a little. They looked I thought a good deal better than the last three weeks, even in the stalled first drive, and I think they might just be okay against Buffalo, which was I believe what Haley's intention was. But we'll see. Only time will tell.

Agree in part but the problems against the run are two-tier. The DL has a several weak links that will also be exploited....

suds79 09-02-2011 07:03 AM

Seems pretty clear to me that when you have Studebaker & Jackson on the same side, that screams to me weak link and teams are taking advantage of it.

I think Houston will replace Studebaker soon enough so I'm not too concerned about that.

But Tyson, wow. Really missing Shaun Smith right about now.

durtyrute 09-02-2011 07:10 AM

That's something that has been bothering me as well. We are not built to come from behind every game. That shit needs to be fixed asap. The only lproblem is I don't think you can fix it in one week.

alnorth 09-02-2011 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForeverChiefs58 (Post 7873145)
The thing that can save us this year is our division. Even with a shitty record I think we can win it again, cause the rest of our division will be pretty bad. We may be last year's Seahawks.

Exactly. 9 wins is our ceiling, 8 if we're lucky. Our schedule is brutal, but our division is a joke.

TEX 09-02-2011 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alnorth (Post 7873690)
Exactly. 9 wins is our ceiling, 8 if we're lucky. Our schedule is brutal, but our division is a joke.

I don't agree that we'll win "8 if we're lucky" and I'll tell you why. It's is because of our division. We were 2-4 last year within the division. If we dramatically improve there, winning 10 games is very possible.

HemiEd 09-02-2011 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 7873335)
Ours has been worse than atrocious for the first two drives. Then something happens and they wake up. But like I said, as a Chiefs fan I'm truly worried about that little habit.

The Chiefs D looked great last night after Aaron Rodgers grabbed some bench. Their 2nd stringer, made Palko look legit.

O.city 09-02-2011 09:30 AM

I think that the d getting gouged just goes to show that in the NFL, one blown assignment or missed gap can lead to a big gain. I know we didn't quite have the preaseason we wanted but it is steal preseason

Frankie 09-02-2011 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 7873843)
I think that the d getting gouged just goes to show that in the NFL, one blown assignment or missed gap can lead to a big gain. I know we didn't quite have the preaseason we wanted but it is steal preseason

Meh, in the preseason, not all teams fully open their playbooks. I think that probably explains our O.

But this thing about falling into an early hole is a bad trend with the Chiefs that goes back a few years with us. I want to see our D come out aware and clicking at the very beginning of the games. A little frustrating when they seem to sleepwalk through the first couple of enemy drives.

ToxSocks 09-02-2011 10:41 AM

Why do people keep saying our division sucks? Yeah, the Donkeys suck, but that's about it.

SD has Vincent Jackson and Antonio Gates back healthy. Phillip Rivers is an Elite QB. Chiefs fans, it's time for you guys to accept it. As long as Rivers is in the Division, the Chargers will always be a division contender.

Oakland Returns with #2 Rushing Offense in the NFL and they pounded the division last year
....

Yeah, Denver, you suck.

It's going to take 11 wins to take the division, at least.

ForeverChiefs58 09-02-2011 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 7874017)
Why do people keep saying our division sucks? Yeah, the Donkeys suck, but that's about it.

SD has Vincent Jackson and Antonio Gates back healthy. Phillip Rivers is an Elite QB. Chiefs fans, it's time for you guys to accept it. As long as Rivers is in the Division, the Chargers will always be a division contender.

Oakland Returns with #2 Rushing Offense in the NFL and they pounded the division last year
....

Yeah, Denver, you suck.

It's going to take 11 wins to take the division, at least.



Our division always plays us tough. I remember when SD was 1-15 and we were their one and only win. They play us hard no matter what. But I don't think anyone in our division will fare as well against the rest of the schedule.
I would be pretty shocked if anyone in the AFC west gets 11 wins this year.

Pants 09-02-2011 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KurtCobain (Post 7872952)
There's no way in hell we lose more than 5 of these games.

LMAO

Mr. Laz 09-02-2011 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KurtCobain (Post 7872952)
There's no way in hell we lose more than 5 of these games.

you're on crack ... the Chiefs could be playing well and lose 5 straight


<table style="width: 366px; height: 77px;" class="data-table1" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"><td class="first ">11</td><td nowrap="true"> Nov 21</td><td nowrap="true"> KC @ NE </td><td>Gillette Stadium</td><td>8:30 PM </td><td nowrap="true">
</td><td class="">
</td></tr><tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"><td class="first ">12</td><td nowrap="true"> Nov 27</td><td nowrap="true"> PIT @ KC </td><td>Arrowhead Stadium</td><td>8:20 PM </td><td nowrap="true">
</td><td class="">
</td></tr><tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"><td class="first ">13</td><td nowrap="true"> Dec 04</td><td nowrap="true"> KC @ CHI </td><td>Soldier Field</td><td>1:00 PM </td><td nowrap="true">
</td><td class="">
</td></tr><tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"><td class="first ">14</td><td nowrap="true"> Dec 11</td><td nowrap="true"> KC @ NYJ </td><td>MetLife Stadium</td><td>1:00 PM </td><td nowrap="true">
</td><td class="">
</td></tr><tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"><td class="first ">15</td><td nowrap="true"> Dec 18</td><td nowrap="true"> GB @ KC </td><td>Arrowhead Stadium</td><td>1:00 PM </td><td nowrap="true">
</td></tr></tbody></table>

RedThat 09-02-2011 11:38 AM

I think they lose all 5 of those games.

keg in kc 09-02-2011 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 7873406)
is it stude or jackson or both?

i thought jackson looked like his usual puss self...i didn't catch much of the 2nd half...

I don't think Jackson's a puss as much I think he doesn't always do what exactly what he's supposed to. Which in this defense is a big deal. But I do think he does an adequate job of occupying his guy(s).

I think too many people (and I don't mean you when I'm saying this, just making a general comment...) are expecting the wrong thing from our d-line. This is not the Cowboys defense, these guys are not busting upfield to make plays in the backfield. That's just not their role. And I think failing to grasp that is what leads to so many people (starting with the media) complaining about Jackson and (I'm expecting...) Gregg and even Dorsey. Not taking down ball carriers in the backfield and not sacking quarterbacks does not mean they're playing poorly. Because, basically, the only time they get to go after guys is when a blocking assignment is completely whiffed. The rest of the time it's boring old trench work. Now if they get blown off the ball, that's another story. But most of the time their job is about holding people up so the linebackers are free to do their thing.

And unfortunately, Studebaker doesn't appear to be able to do that a lot of the time. He's not very agile or quick laterally, he doesn't have any speed in pursuit and he doesn't have the experience and knowledge that in the past let Vrabel compensate (to a degree) for those same limitations. I think we're going to see a lot of people targetting the left side of the defense this year, and while some of that may well be Jackson (he's not Dorsey...), I think the real weak link is Stude. Too many running plays this preseason have been stalled at the line, and then taken outside where he doesn't have the speed to cut them off before they get the corner.

RealSNR 09-02-2011 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 7874079)
you're on crack ... the Chiefs could be playing well and lose 5 straight


<table style="width: 366px; height: 77px;" class="data-table1" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"><td class="first ">11</td><td nowrap="true"> Nov 21</td><td nowrap="true"> KC @ NE </td><td>Gillette Stadium</td><td>8:30 PM </td><td nowrap="true">
</td><td class="">
</td></tr><tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"><td class="first ">12</td><td nowrap="true"> Nov 27</td><td nowrap="true"> PIT @ KC </td><td>Arrowhead Stadium</td><td>8:20 PM </td><td nowrap="true">
</td><td class="">
</td></tr><tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"><td class="first ">13</td><td nowrap="true"> Dec 04</td><td nowrap="true"> KC @ CHI </td><td>Soldier Field</td><td>1:00 PM </td><td nowrap="true">
</td><td class="">
</td></tr><tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"><td class="first ">14</td><td nowrap="true"> Dec 11</td><td nowrap="true"> KC @ NYJ </td><td>MetLife Stadium</td><td>1:00 PM </td><td nowrap="true">
</td><td class="">
</td></tr><tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"><td class="first ">15</td><td nowrap="true"> Dec 18</td><td nowrap="true"> GB @ KC </td><td>Arrowhead Stadium</td><td>1:00 PM </td><td nowrap="true">
</td></tr></tbody></table>

Could lose them all.

Will they? Doubtful.

Pasta Little Brioni 09-02-2011 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedThat (Post 7874091)
I think they lose all 5 of those games.

There's the problem. Stop doing that.

RedThat 09-02-2011 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 7874264)
There's the problem. Stop doing that.

Yeah but its just my opinion.

Frankie 09-02-2011 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 7873372)
My concern after watching that early drive is that teams will target Studebaker at the LOLB position all year long in the run game. They need to get Houston or Sheffield on the field early and often. That's what I see as really the only vulnerable spot on the field now.

Don't get me wrong I like both Sheff and Houston better that Studebaker. I don't know about last night but in the previous games a lot of the opponents' success in their initial drives were due to our players over shooting the backfield and playing themselves out of the play.

Both Sheff and Houston's styles are more aggressive than Studey's. Though as non-starters they had little involvement in the 1st couple of drives once they are in they have to learn to protect against overplaying the rush.

ToxSocks 09-02-2011 02:23 PM

I need to see Houston and The Sheriff play better in run support before I go crying that Studebaker should be benched.

WhiteWhale 09-02-2011 02:25 PM

If Buffalo gains 20+ yards on an off-tackle run to the right on their opening play I'm gonna huck a rock through my TV.

Frankie 09-02-2011 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 7873410)
The Chiefs are soft against the run. Gonna be a long season if they can't fix it. People will say stuff like,"If it wasn't for that 1 long run we'd have been ok." Problem is they will be saying it every game.

I thought we took care of the up the middle stuff by signing Craig and Amon whoever.

As for the edge runs I can see what you are saying. Especially our left side.

ToxSocks 09-02-2011 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 7874503)
I thought we took care of the up the middle stuff by signing Craig and Amon whoever.

As for the edge runs I can see what you are saying. Especially our left side.

You don't watch much Chiefs football, do you?

Frankie 09-02-2011 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 7873719)
The Chiefs D looked great last night after Aaron Rodgers grabbed some bench. Their 2nd stringer, made Palko look legit.

I can't believe I started feeling OK about Palko after the 3rd preseason game. His consecutive passes to Copper which he dropped (and possibly lost his job) were the only brief moments Palko looked good, IMO.

WhiteWhale 09-02-2011 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 7874503)
I thought we took care of the up the middle stuff by signing Craig and Amon whoever.

As for the edge runs I can see what you are saying. Especially our left side.

If there's 1 thing I'm pissed about after that game, it's this:

The Bake has done nothing to establish himself, and is being outplayed by his back-ups. Why not let Houston/Sheffield get some time in with the 1's?

It's a two-parter: Same exact thing, except regarding Jackson/Gilberry/Bailey.

The left side has consistently shown problems all preseason when those guys are in there.

Frankie 09-02-2011 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 7874079)
<table style="width: 366px; height: 77px;" class="data-table1" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"><td class="first ">11</td><td nowrap="true"> Nov 21</td><td nowrap="true"> KC @ NE </td><td>Gillette Stadium</td><td>8:30 PM </td><td nowrap="true">
</td><td class="">
</td></tr><tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"><td class="first ">12</td><td nowrap="true"> Nov 27</td><td nowrap="true"> PIT @ KC </td><td>Arrowhead Stadium</td><td>8:20 PM </td><td nowrap="true">
</td><td class="">
</td></tr><tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"><td class="first ">13</td><td nowrap="true"> Dec 04</td><td nowrap="true"> KC @ CHI </td><td>Soldier Field</td><td>1:00 PM </td><td nowrap="true">
</td><td class="">
</td></tr><tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"><td class="first ">14</td><td nowrap="true"> Dec 11</td><td nowrap="true"> KC @ NYJ </td><td>MetLife Stadium</td><td>1:00 PM </td><td nowrap="true">
</td><td class="">
</td></tr><tr class="tbdy1 " valign="top"><td class="first ">15</td><td nowrap="true"> Dec 18</td><td nowrap="true"> GB @ KC </td><td>Arrowhead Stadium</td><td>1:00 PM </td><td nowrap="true">
</td></tr></tbody></table>

Man that's not right. :eek:

Ebolapox 09-02-2011 02:36 PM

I'm concerned about your mother's vagina. her ass is perfectly fine, but her vagina is rather...how do the kids say these days... stank. hey, that rhymes with skank! :)

Frankie 09-02-2011 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 7874516)
If there's 1 thing I'm pissed about after that game, it's this:

The Bake has done nothing to establish himself, and is being outplayed by his back-ups. Why not let Houston/Sheffield get some time in with the 1's?

It's a two-parter: Same exact thing, except regarding Jackson/Gilberry/Bailey.

The left side has consistently shown problems all preseason when those guys are in there.

You don't watch much Chiefs football, do you?

;):evil:

Frankie 09-02-2011 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by H5N1 (Post 7874523)
I'm concerned about your mother's vagina. her ass is perfectly fine, but her vagina is rather...how do the kids say these days... stank. hey, that rhymes with skank! :)

Stay tuned.

Ebolapox 09-02-2011 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 7874528)
Stay tuned.

yeah, I know. it felt feeble to me too. my heart just isn't in it. I mean, it gets rather monotonous and boring with the same old insults. y'know?

I mean, if I was feeling creative, I could break out a burqa joke. I could make another geriatric comment. I could make a suicide bomber joke. the material is endless, yet I revert to the old stuff? I'm disappointed in me too. :(

ToxSocks 09-02-2011 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 7874524)
You don't watch much Chiefs football, do you?

;):evil:

My Comment was regarding Craig and Amon Whatever....Not the Left side....

Ebolapox 09-02-2011 03:42 PM

damn, man. I KNEW you reminded me of gollum!

rocknrolla 09-02-2011 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KurtCobain (Post 7872927)
I'm concerned that Frankie doesn't look like John from Garfield. That's how I've always pictured him.

ROFL

Reerun_KC 09-02-2011 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 7874079)
you're on crack ... the Chiefs could be playing well and lose 5 straight


<TABLE style="WIDTH: 366px; HEIGHT: 77px" class=data-table1 border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR class="tbdy1 " vAlign=top><TD class="first ">11</TD><TD noWrap>Nov 21</TD><TD noWrap>KC @ NE </TD><TD>Gillette Stadium</TD><TD>8:30 PM </TD><TD noWrap>

</TD><TD>

</TD></TR><TR class="tbdy1 " vAlign=top><TD class="first ">12</TD><TD noWrap>Nov 27</TD><TD noWrap>PIT @ KC </TD><TD>Arrowhead Stadium</TD><TD>8:20 PM </TD><TD noWrap>

</TD><TD>

</TD></TR><TR class="tbdy1 " vAlign=top><TD class="first ">13</TD><TD noWrap>Dec 04</TD><TD noWrap>KC @ CHI </TD><TD>Soldier Field</TD><TD>1:00 PM </TD><TD noWrap>

</TD><TD>

</TD></TR><TR class="tbdy1 " vAlign=top><TD class="first ">14</TD><TD noWrap>Dec 11</TD><TD noWrap>KC @ NYJ </TD><TD>MetLife Stadium</TD><TD>1:00 PM </TD><TD noWrap>

</TD><TD>

</TD></TR><TR class="tbdy1 " vAlign=top><TD class="first ">15</TD><TD noWrap>Dec 18</TD><TD noWrap>GB @ KC </TD><TD>Arrowhead Stadium</TD><TD>1:00 PM </TD><TD noWrap>

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

You know what sucks about these last 5 games for me...

I am unable to predect the future of the NFL like you guys... Shit its a long season and I cant predict injuries, games and stats...

So All I can say is I am glad they can actually play the games, otherwise you guys would just fold the team permanently out of fear...

keg in kc 09-02-2011 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 7874489)
Don't get me wrong I like both Sheff and Houston better that Studebaker. I don't know about last night but in the previous games a lot of the opponents' success in their initial drives were due to our players over shooting the backfield and playing themselves out of the play.

Both Sheff and Houston's styles are more aggressive than Studey's. Though as non-starters they had little involvement in the 1st couple of drives once they are in they have to learn to protect against overplaying the rush.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 7874495)
I need to see Houston and The Sheriff play better in run support before I go crying that Studebaker should be benched.

I don't disagree with either of those statements. Well, no, I do disagree with "players overshooting the backfield and playing themselves out of plays". That doesn't happen much with the starters. But I'm not saying Sheffield and Houston should start now. I am saying that I think Studebaker is a weak link and I hope one of them is ready at some point during the season (I expect they both will be).

And in the end, if it's about a young guy learning, I will take overpursuit over not able to reach the play 7 days a week and twice on Sunday. But that's just me. Call it the price of doing business

Frankie 09-02-2011 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by H5N1 (Post 7874537)
yeah, I know. it felt feeble to me too. my heart just isn't in it. I mean, it gets rather monotonous and boring with the same old insults. y'know?

I mean, if I was feeling creative, I could break out a burqa joke. I could make another geriatric comment. I could make a suicide bomber joke. the material is endless, yet I revert to the old stuff? I'm disappointed in me too. :(

Your boyfriend told us you were locked in a 69. Nice to see you can type in that position. What else is your specialty? Oh, wait, just tell me when we meet.

Frankie 09-02-2011 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 7874689)
I don't disagree with either of those statements. Well, no, I do disagree with "players overshooting the backfield and playing themselves out of plays". That doesn't happen much with the starters.

In the Ram's game it seemed like it was happening on every other play in the Ram's first two drives.

Smed1065 09-03-2011 03:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 7872828)
... our #1 D looking lost in the first couple of drives of each game. I saw that in some regular season games as well last year and I hope it's not become a KC Chiefs signature.

As improved as we are on paper we cannot afford to start getting it together 14 points behind with the regular season opponents we will have.

Thoughts?

About the crisis that fell of the face of the world.

See me world. Kill the dissenter.

milkman 09-03-2011 05:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 7874495)
I need to see Houston and The Sheriff play better in run support before I go crying that Studebaker should be benched.

Why?

Not that it matters in the big picture of things, but Sheffield, in the first three preseason games has played better in run support than Studebaker.

But Studebaker offers you nothing at that spot.

Both Houston and Shef are far more athletic and faster and will make more plays by accident than Studebaker will by design.

Dave Lane 09-03-2011 07:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KurtCobain (Post 7872942)
Can't wait to pull this up right before the playoff game.

I think someone else fell off the wagon. Mark that post for us.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.