Oakland only has 3 active WR's
 

1

Damn!!! Maybe there is a god....

4-4-3

Stack the box

They wern't going to need them anyway. Every team's gameplan will be pound the rock up the middle. And it will work.

Is their TE inactive, too?

You don't need WRs to beat the Chiefs in the passing game. You need RBs who can catch the ball in the flat and a good TE

As far as I am concerned, Fargas being inactive is the best news of the morning!

They way they run the ball, they prolly only need TE and 1 wideout.

This...

It's no secret even to the Raiders. To beat the Chiefs they are going to have to pound the ball down our throats. If they need a passing game they're screwed anyway and they know it.

Only 3 active WRs?
Wonder what Oakland plans on doing today...hmmmm....:spock:

No hindsight excuse, if Haley and Co don't have a plan in place for dealing with the Faider running game then they should be kicked in their collective daddy bags.

How about all you offensive line lovers that were craving the Khalif Barnes?

That means they'll run the ball. And they can. Should be interesting