View Single Post
Old 02-25-2025, 03:29 PM   #1831
RunKC RunKC is offline
Andy Reid Supporter
 
RunKC's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2012
Casino cash: $-1730389
Quote:
Originally Posted by duncan_idaho View Post
Politely, but firmly, disagree. Unless Ersey falls to 63 or 66. And even then I’d rather them go another direction.

Simmons and Conerly are the only guys I can consider at T as round 1 guys and feel like it is smart or works.
Yeah I’m not an Ersery or Conerly fan. More of an indictment against Jackson bc he did the Thuney thing moving from guard to
tackle to replace Simmons. I don’t think Jackson is a tackle at the next level. I think he is a guard.

The only tackle that I really like is Simmons and I don’t think he’s obtainable.

To be honest, our best move is likely free agency to fix tackle as much as people hate that route. This is just too good of a defensive class to take a project tackle again. I don’t see how defense is not the clear BPA in the first round, unless it’s a running back and even then I’m not confident that they would pass on a defender.
__________________
Mike Greenberg@Espngreeny
I can’t fathom what it must be like to be a fan of the #Chiefs.


Adopt a Chief: Jared Wiley
Posts: 52,255
RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.
    Reply With Quote