![]() |
Rams' Steven Jackson vs. Chiefs' Larry Johnson
I'd like to hear a few comments (from those more knowledgable than me) about why Jackson is considered the future of the Rams after Faulk retires and Johnson is considered a bust.
Based on their build alone, both players seem to Eddie George-type RBs (which isn't in the Faulk/Priest/Blaylock mold). Both were late 1st round draft picks. Both were considered the #1 RB in the draft that season. Johnson has had fewer opportunities than Jackson, but on the surface the two guys seem to have a LOT in common. |
Without getting too technical, Steven Jackson is the shit, Larry JOhnson just looks like it.
|
we def. lose another LJ needs to get some carreis in.
|
As long as Rich Scanlon is not a member of the Kansas City Chiefs active roster on game day, Larry Johnson isn't worth the time it takes to type La
See? |
In general I agree, but Johnson has done a number of things to not endear himself to fans. Also, i think MOST people around here feel that Priest will still be here another year or two, which means that the Chiefs will have wasted Johnson's youthfull years -- unless they deal him, in which case they're not going to get much, making him a bust. Faulk, on the other hand, is definitely on the down side of his great career and Jackson is getting chances to play NOW. Plus, Faulk probably will retire at the end of this year, making Jackson was more useful.
|
Johnson is a bust because he gets no playing time it's that simple. How could he ever become a NFL runningback if they don't give him any carries. Sometimes you just have to let a player sink or swim but the Chiefs coaching staff are afraid to let him play. They made him a bust.
|
Stephen Jackson is a fast agile and a BIG back. Larry Johnson is just big. Jackson makes one move and he is in the secondary, johnson makes one move and he is running right into the back of Willie roaf
|
I'd suggest spending more time in the film room Mister...
|
Quote:
Other than the fact that they were both first round picks, they have virtually nothing in common. Jackson's a big bruising back with speed and Johnson's a little bitch with the speed of a DLineman running backwards. Johnson was actually drafted after an injured Willis McGahee, eventhough Willis might've never stepped on an NFL field. That shows you how much the Bills thought of LJ. Really, I've watched both play in college and in the NFL, and they're not comparable at all. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Well, LJ sucks for one thing.
|
We ruined Larry Johnsons career.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Solid move on their part, IMO. |
Exactly. They clearly didn't think LJ was at Willis' level, even with a torn up knee.
|
Quote:
That's not quite the same as saying that a healthy LJ is worse than at injured McGahee, IMO. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
If Peterson wasn't a dipsh*t, LJ would be playing for the Titans right now and we would have a CB or LB helping out our defense.
|
Don't you know the difference yet? All the Chiefs' players suck, while everbody else's players rule. That is why we are Chiefs fans.
|
Quote:
LJ's just not a good NFL back. Look no further than the fact that he can't even beat out a 5th round draft pick for the #2 spot on the depth chart. There's a reason he doesn't see the field alot. It's because he sucks. |
Top 3 reasons LJ is never going to measure up to Stephen Jackson
1. Stephen Jackson has burst (big time) 2. Stephen Jackson can block 3. Stephen Jackson has good vision for gaps |
Quote:
Enough said. |
Quote:
You're a dipshit. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'll jump on this bandwagon...
Quote:
|
|
That reminds me more of LJ than Steven Jackson does.
|
Quote:
That isn't even close to the truth. EVERYTHING I saw prior to the draft was that McGahee had made a very suprising & strong recovery, it was just a matter of WHEN, not IF, he'd be ready to play. Having said that, most everyone was shocked that Buffalo took him because they did have Henry and needed help in other positions and many fans were unhappy about it at the time. Like someone else said, it wasn't a dig at LJ that they didn't take him, but rather showed just how highly they thought of McGahee. Everyone thought he'd be the #1 or #2 pick in the draft prior to his injury and he was considered an all world talent. Given that they had Henry, they could afford to give McGahee time to heal and now they are damn glad they did. |
I wonder if LJ can avg 3.7 ypc like Mcgahee?
|
Quote:
|
That is a newborn baby anteater by the way. Also a better RB than LJ.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:17 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.