![]() |
Tim Tebow is John Elway
You see, there are so many similarities between these 2 quarterbacks.
1. Both were extremely hyped college quarterbacks. 2. They both like to run around the field. 3. They both have lots of heart. 4. They both have championship rings. and the real kicker: 5. John Elway, in his second season, lost to the Steelers in the wildcard playoff game at home. 6. Tim Tebow, in his second season, lost to the Steelers in the wildcard playoff game at home. It's pretty eery |
|
Only difference is that Elway actually was a good QB.
|
If that peckerhead turns into an Elway we are going to track you down.
Now with that said, Tebow an Elway ? That will take a miracle of major proportions. Tebow as a passing QB is horrible right now and will probably be forever. |
:popcorn:
|
You are so stupid.
|
|
They're both bad quarterbacks.
They both get more credit than they deserve for their team's wins. |
Quote:
Horseface never won shit until The Rat demoted him to the Number Two Option and made Terrell Davis the Number One Option. deal with it Cheating Donkey homers |
Quote:
How happy would we be if we drafted a QB with the #1 pick and he had those statistics for a full decade? As a comparison, Elway's career rating is 79.9, with 3021 yards, 16 TDs and 16 Ints. During his 11 years in Philly, Donovan McNabb's rating was 85.6. He averaged 3,390 yards, 20 TDs, and 9 Ints. Which guy would you rather have? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I guess they, for some reason, probably thought that was better than pretty statistics. |
Quote:
Average season (and median on the QB rating): Elway: 3,021 yards, 15.8 TDs, 15.8 Ints, QB Rating 74.6 (Best Year: 83.4) Dan Marino: 3,950 yards, 29.0 TDs, 16.5 Ints, QB Rating 85.5 (Best Year: 108.9) Jim Kelly: 3,266 yards, 22.3 TDs, 15.6 Ints, QB Rating 83.6 (Best Year: 101.2) Neil Lomax (8 year career): 2,846 yards, 17.0 TDs, 11.3 Ints, QB Rating 83.1 (Best Year 92.5) Jim Everett: 3,158 yards, 19.0 TDs, 15.5 Ints, QB Rating 79.8 (Best Year 90.6) Randall Cunningham: 2,227 yards, 14.7 TDs, 10 Ints, QB Rating 76.6 (Best Year 91.6) (He didn't start as a rookie and missed nearly two other complete seasons, presumably due to injury.) In his seven full seasons (one of which he started only five games), he averaged 2,980 yards, 20.1 TDs, 12.4 Ints, and a QB Rating of 77.6. Boomer Esiason: 2,909 yards, 19.0 TDs, 14.0 Ints, QB Rating 80.8 (Best Year 97.4) Phil Simms: 2,574 yards, 15.8 TDs, 13.7 Ints, QB Rating 74.6 (Best Year 90.0) Missed two full seasons due to injury. In the eight full seasons, he averaged 2,881 yards, 17.8 TDs, 15.3 Ints, QB Rating 76.4. So Elway wasn't as good as Neil Lomax or Jim Everett, using those two points of comparison. He was almost as good as Phil Simms, and wasn't in the same league as guys like Boomer Esiason, Randall Cunningham (injuries aside), Jim Kelly, or Dan Marino. |
Quote:
All 7 of the QBs you listed combined: 1 SB win Elway: 2 SB wins |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
ROFL
Oh man, that's a wonderful attempt to tweak history ... all you had to do was watch the games. |
Quote:
|
Meh.I hate horse face and he can still die in an aids tree fire but he was a pretty good QB.
|
Chiefs fans would have killed to have a QB like Elway.
That dude killed our hopes more then once...hence why I hate the guy. But lets be honest, he was a good QB. |
|
|
Lincoln had a secretary named Kennedy
Kennedy had a secretary named Lincoln |
Quote:
|
No.
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
At his best he was the nemeses of some good Chief football teams at Arrowhead. At his worst he was an entertaining Mr. Ed getting body slammed to the turf: |
http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/data:...ULMgGXliq8g//ZThey both have 1 syllable in their first name and 2 syllables in their last names!
http://images.sodahead.com/polls/002...r_2_xlarge.png http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/data:...ULMgGXliq8g//Z |
Quote:
|
No more Tebow threads!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I do like to read comments about how they never won a title until Shanahan came in and it was all Davis. There aren't many QBs out there that have taken teams with a cast of characters like Denver had and won a lot of SBs. They had good teams, but they ere never dominant on the ground game. I mean, his best WRs were the Three Amigos - good, but they weren't the Marks brothers. And, it's always interesting to see when fans like to use (or ignore) stats in favor of the side of the debate they're hammering. Under Reeves: 9-7 13-3 11-5 11-5 10-4 8-8 11-5 5-11 12-4 8-8 Under Wade Phillips: 9-7 7-9 Under Shanahan: 8-8 13-3 12-4 14-2 16 Seasons ... 2 were 8-8 and 2 were under .500 ... 12 were 9+ wins 14-8 Postseason Record 5 SB appearances with 2 wins Yes, they never dominated and won titles until Shanahan put a "team" around him... but the guy certainly didn't spare everyone to death in the years before Shanahan. Elway retired as the QB with the most wins... bottom line, he was great. Marino did great things in 1984... and that was THE ONLY season in which his teams won more than 1 playoff game... so he doesn't really fit your comment in bold above. Marino and his teams, from 1985 through 1999 never won more than 1 playoff game in a single season. Big Ben ... yes, he fits - but you can't compare the team he had around him to what Dan or John had early in their careers. |
I speak only the humble truth with my statistics. I repeat my question: would we be happy with a #1 pick QB who started for a decade and annually produced 16 TDs, 16 Ints, 3,000 yards, and a QB rating of 74?
Players who produced a rating in the 70 to 75 range this year were Josh Freeman, Colt McCoy, Tim Tebow, Rex Grossman, Christian Ponder, and Sam Bradford. |
LOL @ anybody who thinks Elway was a terrible QB. Hate him all you want, but he was great.
|
i never liked the guy .. he got too lucky against us too many times ......
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Statistics are great though... in that 10 year span, he had 6 seasons over 16 TD passes... 6 with fewer than 16 INTs. Again, different era and had he been in an offense with a pass friendly coach like Shula... yeah, he'd have the numbers that Marino put up. Just deal with it... |
Quote:
Don't get me wrong, I think Elway is one of the five best of all time, but he did have pretty average stats. |
Elway's annual rank in QB rating over the course of his career.
1983 - 27th 1984 - 17th 1985 - 17th 1986 - 11th 1987 - 12th 1988 - 18th 1989 - 17th 1990 - 14th 1991 - 19th 1992 - 20th 1993 - 3rd 1994 - 4th 1995 - 14th 1996 - 4th 1997 - 7th 1998 - 5th Granted, from 1993 on he was productive, once new coaches arrived on the scene who recognized that he was more of a complementary player than a star to build around. Once they shifted the focus to other, better players, Elway did fine as a second banana type of quarterback. |
Quote:
|
Elway's annual rank in passing yards over the course of his career.
1983 - 28th 1984 - 15th 1985 - 2nd 1986 - 9th 1987 - 4th 1988 - 8th 1989 - 16th 1990 - 5th 1991 - 8th 1992 - 18th 1993 - 1st 1994 - 8th 1995 - 5th 1996 - 7th 1997 - 6th 1998 - 12th So what we see here is the secret to why some people think Elway was "great". While he was a very inefficient quarterback, he got many, many chances to pile up statistics. Even then he was only in the top 10 percent of the league 2 years out of 16, but the bottom line is that he was given lots of opportunities despite his mediocre performance and was never benched, allowing him to pile up stats over the course of his so-called career. |
Quote:
|
Rain Man ... stats are your game for sure. You enjoy what you're doing if it makes you feel better, the bulk of us saw the games. If you want to rank him up there with guys like Jim Everett - you have fun, buddy.
It's too silly for me to get caught up with it to be quite honest with you. You have a great skill for the spin. One thing that is funny is how you say his stats got better when he was surrounded by better players, suggesting that he no longer had to be the man or the best player on the team. How about all those wins? Very consistent throughout his career... whether he was surrounded by "ok talent" or "great talent". Obviously the personal stats improve when you have better players around you. Look how Marino's stats dropped later in his career, during the last 7-8 years. Marino didn't improve with age. No, as the team became a bit void of talent... and entering a more 'pass friendly era' in the NFL, Marino became less prolific... while Elway became more prolific. Interesting when you peel back that onion. |
Rain Man trolling Donkey fans? Awesome.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
So by your logic Cassel > Elway. Solid logic. Not flawed at all. I hate elway more than any player ever, and it's not because he was an average QB. I can't believe anyone could watch him play and say this nonsense. Elway could do things on a football field that nobody has done before or since. |
What hurt Elway early in his career is he relied too much on his gun arm, and frankly threw the ball so hard that his receivers couldn't catch it. He had no touch until late in his career. His completion percentages were pretty low until then. I'd compare him early on to Stafford.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's a mix of the talent at WR/TE/RB and the offense called by Reeves. There are many reasons why Reeves and Shanahan clashed when he was working for Dan. There's a reason why Shanahan and Elway became such fans of each other and grew tired of Dan's game plans. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I have been around long enough to see quite a few QBs play. Elway was as good as any I have seen. Had Elway played for Bill Walsh he would have rewritten the record book. When the 9ers beat the Broncos 55-10 I said at the time and still believe if Elway would have been playing for the 49ers and Montana was playing for the the Broncos the score would have been much worse. I can only imagine what he would have done with the great Cowboy teams behind that line with the offensive weapons they had. I do know this much to compare Tebow and Elway is way beyond silly.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
First off. Elway was NEVER EVER as good as Denver fans, or even a lot of KC fans, think or remember.
There are a few factors here. One, the AFC was absolutely garbage for most of the 80's. Elway was the best of a shitty bunch. Big ****in deal. He got decimated in the three super bowls he played in before Shanahan came along and they cheated the cap and played borderline rule breaking schemes. If Elway is going to be given all the credit for carrying those shit teams, then he'll take all the blame for getting his shit pushed in in those 3 super bowls. You can't have it both ways. The fact is, Elway was not quite as good as Jim Kelly. If the Bills had won 2 or 3 of those SB's no one would really be having that discussion. The years they went to the playoffs and super bowls, Denver generally had good defenses. Let's not kid ourselves. The years they went to the playoffs before Rayboy arrived, when Elway was supposedly carrying that team the defense was ranked (in terms of points allowed....) 83 - 9th 84 - 2nd 86 - 15th 87 - 7th 89 - 1st 91- 3rd 93 - 10th Let's stop ****ing about like Elway carried some god damn team. 6 of the 7 seasons they went to the playoffs Denver fielded a top 10 defense. Hell, three of those seasons they were top 3! Elway built a legacy based on some 4th quarter comebacks. But the guy never carried a god damn team. It's stupid. Denver fans have their heads up their asses when it comes to Elway. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Good point. |
Quote:
|
the Guardian and Hemied make some really good points. I didn't realize the extent to which the defense was carrying those Broncos teams.
|
Quote:
|
LMAO at people taking Rainman's bait seriously.
|
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
not sure you're a Chiefs Fan at all now... |
Quote:
|
I think the Guardian's post is very insightful. It exposes the myth that Elway carried his team, when in fact Elway was merely Matt Cassel with an ego.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
So what if the poster has a solid history of rep and a lengthy post status? he's immune to criticism and it's ok for him to call Chiefs Fans idiots for being homers? On a CHIEFS WEBSITE? I'd rather be shitty troll (which i'm not) than an grade a Ass Kisser Raider Fan sucking off as many people as possible on a Chiefs Board cause you were too much a pussy to make it on the oakland board. |
We'd all be slurping the metal dick of the Elway statue outside Arrowhead if he had played for us and won us championships.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Again, Elway was NOT that team. |
Quote:
Super Bowl 21 Cmp Att Yds Y/A TD Int Lng Rate John Elway 22 37 304 8.2 1 1 54 83.6 Super Bowl 22 Cmp Att Yds Y/A TD Int Lng Rate John Elway 14 38 257 6.8 1 3 56 36.8 Super Bowl 24 Cmp Att Yds Y/A TD Int Lng Rate John Elway 10 26 108 4.2 0 2 27 19.4 Super Bowl 32* Cmp Att Yds Y/A TD Int Lng Rate John Elway 12 22 123 5.6 0 1 36 51.9 *Willful and illegal violations of the salary cap produced unfair advantages for the team in this year. Super Bowl 33* Cmp Att Yds Y/A TD Int Lng Rate John Elway 18 29 336 11.6 1 1 80 99.2 *Willful and illegal violations of the salary cap produced unfair advantages for the team in this year. In total, he went 76 of 152 for 1,128 yards, 3 TDs, and 8 Ints in Super Bowls. This equates to an average game of 15 for 30 for 226 yards, 0 TDs and 2 Ints. His overall QB rating in Super Bowls was 59.3. Yeah, that's a clutch player. |
Quote:
|
In the first year that the Broncos were given a Super Bowl trophy (which was not later reclaimed once the willful and illegal salary cap violations were revealed), the Broncos played in four postseason games. Elway's pass yardage in those games? 223, 170, 210, and 123.
In the second year that the Broncos were given a Super Bowl trophy (which was not later reclaimed once the willful and illegal salary cap violations were revealed), the Broncos played in three postseason games. Elway's pass yardage in those games? 182, 173, and 336 (25% of which came on one play). When the Broncos were given the Super Bowl trophies (prior to discover of their willful and illegal salary cap violations), they did so in spite of Elway, not because of him. He had been relegated primarily to handoffs. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:35 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.