Importance to the offense who would you have picked?
 

TRich

A declining W. Shields

Both epitomize the Chiefs it would have been best if they both could have retired a Chief. But given the Choice who would you have picked to keep?

T-Rich, actually.
We have a guard to fill in (just not a tackle)
T-Rich was a road grader on the GL. Hopefully Cruz can be as well. He was working out at my gym last week. No point to that, just name dropping.

We have other guards, and Shields costs a lot more money. So if I had a choice I'd rather Shields retired and T-Rich stayed. But I'm fine the way it is.

Kind of my thought as well.

You forgot the "neither" option (not that I would have picked it).

I chose Shields over Richardson. Seriously, we can get another fullback.

i wasn't expecting Shields to play this season so I have already convinced myself that Welbourne would be a nice replacement. Although a nice surprise having Shields back, I'd rather have T-rich.

If you can't have both.
Shields.

Hopefully Cruz, Wilson, Dunn can step in and be the front man to LJ

As much as I hate to see either of them go, Shields still dominates his position.

Will Shields without a doubt. T-Rich was a great player, but his role in the offense was decreasing.

TRich is declining too. Will Shields is and always has been more valuable.

Guards are more valuable than fullbacks. Guards are on the field 100% of offensive downs. Richardson was on the field, what, 33% of downs?

Agreed.

I saw him at the gym, too. Did he look kinda small to you?

i voted t-rich...but i'm football ignernt.
sec

Keep Shields without question..thoo Carl is a fooking idiot to let Trich go. WTf else is he spending the money on...there had better be a good surprise in the Chiefs FA signing future to justify this move. :cuss: :deevee: