ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs "Dissed" by ESPN Power ranking says John Rozum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=249605)

Ming the Merciless 09-07-2011 02:05 PM

Chiefs "Dissed" by ESPN Power ranking says John Rozum
 
Re: http://bleacherreport.com/articles/8...-dis-from-espn


Quote:

If There was a Team Who Got Snubbed, it was the Chiefs

When ESPN released their preseason 2011 NFL Power Rankings, the Kansas City Chiefs were ranked No. 14.

They were the second lowest division champion only to Seattle, but by comparison for 2011, Seahawks haven't improved like the Chiefs.

Despite finishing with an 11-5 record, winning the AFC West for the first time since 2003, and having the game's best ground attack, it apparently wasn't enough to garner any respect.

Even division rival San Diego was ranked in front, and they only finished 9-7 and missed the playoffs.


I really don't know...14 seems about right to me at this point....Is it just me or is this article a homerific pile of shit? Maybe I am just pessimistic but 14 seems like a decent ranking based on the current information at hand..

Who is this homer John Rozum ? Anyone heard of him?


edit: found real name and article

Skyy God 09-07-2011 02:07 PM

We finished 11-5? Break out the kazoos.

Ming the Merciless 09-07-2011 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pittsie (Post 7884998)
We finished 11-5? Break out the kazoos.

hahahah i didnt even catch that

my god what a fail article

ct 09-07-2011 02:08 PM

well 1st of all, he doesn't even know our record last year. secondly, I think 14 is fairly generous, I might say somewhere like 18-20. Unless they come out and truly inspire, i do not like what i've seen from bill muir's offense.

blaise 09-07-2011 02:09 PM

They play the games so we'll find out. Who cares about rankings anyway?

ToxSocks 09-07-2011 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 7884988)
Re: http://www.chiefscrowd.com/index.php...16382&Itemid=2






I really don't know...14 seems about right to me at this point....Is it just me or is this article a homerific pile of shit? Maybe I am just pessimistic but 14 seems like a decent ranking based on the current information at hand..

Who is this homer? Anyone heard of him?

We're not ranked 14 as of this morning. We're ranked 18 now. Which, yeah, I think is BS, But whatever.

As A Chiefs fan I've grown to not a give a **** about what the mass media says.

King_Chief_Fan 09-07-2011 02:09 PM

I am surprised. 14 isnt bad considering what we have witnessed in pre-season

YES, I know pre-season doesn't mean anything.

BigRock 09-07-2011 02:10 PM

What does the guy who ran The Truman Show care about the Chiefs' power ranking?

Ming the Merciless 09-07-2011 02:11 PM

I would say 15-16 at worst

(2nd place in division)

So yah, 18 is a little low...but "dissed"...

LOL

OnTheWarpath15 09-07-2011 02:12 PM

Guessing his panties will get bunched even more after reading this:

http://espn.go.com/nfl/powerrankings/_/year/2011/week/1


We're actually ranked 18th.


EDIT: HOLY ****ING REPOST.

alpha_omega 09-07-2011 02:12 PM

Middle of the pack sounds about right to me....11 wins last season does not.

ToxSocks 09-07-2011 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ct (Post 7885003)
well 1st of all, he doesn't even know our record last year. secondly, I think 14 is fairly generous, I might say somewhere like 18-20. Unless they come out and truly inspire, i do not like what i've seen from bill muir's offense.

Quote:

Originally Posted by King_Chief_Fan (Post 7885007)
I am surprised. 14 isnt bad considering what we have witnessed in pre-season

YES, I know pre-season doesn't mean anything.

We're not ranked 14. That was the point of this poorly written POS Article.

Predarat 09-07-2011 02:14 PM

This is not good. If he is right that means no playoffs. That sucks.

Ming the Merciless 09-07-2011 02:16 PM

John Rozum has a small flaccid penis. John Rozum has a small flaccid penis. John Rozum has a small flaccid penis. John Rozum has a small flaccid penis. John Rozum has a small flaccid penis. John Rozum has a small flaccid penis. John Rozum has a small flaccid penis. John Rozum has a small flaccid penis. John Rozum has a small flaccid penis. John Rozum has a small flaccid penis. John Rozum has a small flaccid penis. John Rozum has a small flaccid penis. John Rozum has a small flaccid penis. John Rozum has a small flaccid penis. John Rozum has a small flaccid penis. John Rozum has a small flaccid penis. John Rozum has a small flaccid penis. John Rozum has a small flaccid penis. John Rozum has a small flaccid penis. John Rozum has a small flaccid penis. John Rozum has a small flaccid penis. John Rozum has a small flaccid penis. John Rozum has a small flaccid penis. John Rozum has a small flaccid penis. John Rozum has a small flaccid penis. John Rozum has a small flaccid penis. John Rozum has a small flaccid penis. John Rozum has a small flaccid penis. John Rozum has a small flaccid penis. John Rozum has a small flaccid penis.

ToxSocks 09-07-2011 02:17 PM

It is a diss. Look at the way they ranked these teams. Colts @ #9 w/o Manning? Are you ****ing kidding me?

What have the Cowboys, Lions and Rams done?

We're as bad as the Jaguars? It's a BS Power Ranking, like usual.

They don't even have a reasonable explanation as to why we're so low. "It's hard to duplicate a break out year" Really? That's the Logic used here?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.