Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman
Here's how I see it.
(Is that a verbal crutch?)
Thigpen stiil has more question marks than any of the top 3 QBs discussed.
For Bradford, the questions are whether he can transition to the NFL and make reads and the more difficult throws in the NFL.
For Stafford, can he become a better decision maker.
For Sanchez, can he play at the same level without the blue chip talent surrounding him.
All the questions that will follow Bradford and Stafford into the NFL are questions that Thigpen hasn't really answered yet himself.
Those questions are the reason that a lot of people find it difficult to jump on the TT bandwagon.
While I am willing to give Thigpen time to answer those question, I can understand why people have legitimate concerns.
But, while I am willing to give him time, I also would rather not go into the next season with Thigpen as the only option.
|
We're in total agreement, but you know damn good and well that we're in the minority.
You have people saying that a QB should get 3 years to develop, and then those same people saying Thigpen SHOULDN'T get three years because he can't be "fixed" in three years.
Bit of a double standard, dontchathink?