Quote:
Originally Posted by Micjones
There's no balance to this discussion about Matt Cassel.
It's either extreme right or extreme left.
There are people who claim he's unable to hit an open target.
The same people fail to give him credit when he does in a game like last week. They say it's because he's facing softer coverage, but why should that matter if he's so inaccurate?
Then on the other side there are those who never criticize him. They ignore the over/underthrows. They ignore how quickly he gets uncomfortable with pressure around him. They turn a blind eye to him hanging on to the ball too long.
I'm not a fan of Matt Cassel, but I can criticize him when he deserves it...
And praise him when he deserves it.
QB's stink up the joint against Prevent defenses every week.
It was maddening to see people ignore a 4 TD game (with no INT's) entirely.
I'll be the first one to tell you that that success should've come earlier in the game, but I'll never turn my nose up to that kind of performance entirely.
He's not the answer long-term. I think this team should draft a QB come April, but I also think he's done good things this year.
He has just as many TD's as he did in '09...with only a fourth as many INT's.
And there are still 7 left to play. He's also completing just under 60% of his passes. Give credit where credit is due.
|
I gave credit to Cassel against Oakland, and said that he made enough plays to win that game, and that Bowe, and the defense let him down.
But I can not give him credit for game against the Donkeys.
Even if there have been some QBs that have done poorly against prevent defenses, that is just an indictment of those QBs.
There is no reason that a decent backup shouldn't be able to play well against a prevent.
And our backup starter did what he was supposed to be able to do.