Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO
Why would they have bombed if they were actually slower?
|
Are you kidding?
Let's say a receiver is timed at running a 4.5 but in reality runs a 4.9. Are you claiming that he'd have the same success on the field as a receiver with true 4.9 speed as opposed to 4.5?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO
Again you gave said speed is not indicative of football skills.
|
Of course it's not. But the two aren't mutually exclusive. A guy that has great football skills while being fast athletically is going to have a better success rate than a guy with great football skills that runs 5/10ths of a second slower.
Get it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO
And you aren't the only guy to play ball or go to school with guys who went on to ncaa football success
|
So? Does that mean that their 40 times were accurate or inaccurate? What's the point?