|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
Are you kidding?
Let's say a receiver is timed at running a 4.5 but in reality runs a 4.9. Are you claiming that he'd have the same success on the field as a receiver with true 4.9 speed as opposed to 4.5? Quote:
Get it? So? Does that mean that their 40 times were accurate or inaccurate? What's the point? |
|
Posts: 88,960
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Shit
Join Date: Jun 2008
Casino cash: $10039067
|
I could see a slower wr having more success than a faster guy. Yeah. It happens all the time in the nfl.
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 55,715
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
Quote:
![]() So, if all things are equal except speed, a linebacker that runs a 5.2 is just as successful as a linebacker that runs a 4.7? Really? Since when? |
|
Posts: 88,960
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Shit
Join Date: Jun 2008
Casino cash: $10039067
|
You didn't say all things being equal about that point read your first paragraph again.
Don't move the posts. Posted via Mobile Device |
Posts: 55,715
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
Quote:
That's the point! That's why our 40 times were accurate in high school! Because no one that was timed at a 4.7 or a 4.6 or a 4.5 was then deemed to be slower than shit and unworthy of playing time when they hit the next level! JFC. |
|
Posts: 88,960
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Shit
Join Date: Jun 2008
Casino cash: $10039067
|
No one has said 4.5 to "slower than shit"
A tenth or two is very easy to be off on a hand timed 40. Quote:
|
|
Posts: 55,715
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|