View Single Post
Old 01-02-2013, 02:20 AM   #218
Exoter175 Exoter175 is offline
Veteran
 
Exoter175's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Olathe
Casino cash: $168
[quote=Saccopoo;9267080]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exoter175 View Post

What you fail to understand is that no one gives a rats ass about YOUR hypothetical scenario because, frankly, it's ****ing stupid.
Then quit arguing with me sacrider. OH MY GOD GENIUS IDEA RIGHT? ERMAHGERD DRERFT GERNO

Quote:
Originally Posted by SNR View Post
I thought we wouldn't know anything until the combine got here? What makes you so confident that we won't be sacrificing QB value?

QBs WILL BE ****ING GONE. I've already given you a list of teams, but you systematically pooh-poohed each one for some dumbshit reason in spite of the fact that this is a QB driven league. For example, you're telling me that Buffalo won't take a QB because Fitzpatrick got a Cassel contract and is actually pretty good???

Go **** yourself. You're presenting valid arguments, but not good arguments. There's a difference.

"The Chiefs should draft Te'o because if they don't the earth will explode" is a valid argument. It's not a good one, though, because the premise is stupid and nonsensical. That's exactly what you're giving me. You're saying the Chiefs should draft Te'o because:

-Te'o is head and shoulders above the other ILBs
-The QBs likely aren't good enough to warrant the pick
-Plenty of great franchise-caliber QBs like Wilson and Barkley will be available in the second round
-Te'o is a special kind of player that all great teams need in order to win games
-Fitzpatrick is pretty good and other shitty reasons why other teams won't draft QBs in the first round

All of these are stupid. They're wrong. And if they're not wrong, then they require proof from the combine, which you told me I needed to prove any of my arguments, but apparently you don't need to wait for the combine. All of YOUR hypotheticals are fine to use. Mine aren't, though.

How does my logic taste, pillowbitergot?
Uh, you're forgetting the part where a lot of the talking heads and mock drafters are starting to remove many of the QB picks, based solely on the information I've used here to play devils advocate.

You seem to think if I had the choice, I'd take Te'o over all others. If you truly think that, you are quite the Dummypants

Quote:
Originally Posted by SNR View Post
You're overpimping him to the point of calling him a #1 pick. That's an atrocious statement, and if you refuse to give that up as a good course of action for KC, then you're not toning it down enough.

MLBs are NOT #1 overall picks.
You're right, only players like Jamarcus Russel can be #1 overall picks, you know, the last #1 pick from the AFC West. That one went over so well.
Posts: 1,971
Exoter175 has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.Exoter175 has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.Exoter175 has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.Exoter175 has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.Exoter175 has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.Exoter175 has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.Exoter175 has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.Exoter175 has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.Exoter175 has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.Exoter175 has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.Exoter175 has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.
  Reply With Quote