Originally Posted by Bowser
This drives me batty. Why would anyone, much less someone that's been labeled an "expert" or "insider", say anything of the sort? If I'm not mistaken, Albert has now played more games at left tackle at an NFL level than he played at guard in college. Not only that, he's played solidly at tackle. Solid enough to warrant being re-signed at the position, imo. Apparently we're all missing something these "experts" are seeing?
because so far Albert hasn't been anything particularly special at LT and they probably think he could be a dominant LG.
The question for the Chiefs is how much money he wants. He's a solid enough left tackle that i imagine the Chiefs would prefer to keep him and address other needs. The will do that unless Albert forces something by demanding top LT money.