In a way, Im content this Kansas City Chiefs team does not have a true #1 WR

B_Ambuehl · 02-14-2006, 02:08 PM

You have 2 options:

A: You get your catches on a losing team while making $500 K - 8 million per year for years and years on end.

Or

B: You play on a winning superbowl team but your team runs the ball 90% of the time and you're not even a starter. Every year you're facing the reality of being cut and froced to take a real job or play football in the arena leagues for $50 k per year.

Which situation do you think most players are gonna choose?

The notion that players care about winning more then personal stats and accomplishments is a media creation.

02-14-2006, 02:08 PM	#4
B_Ambuehl Veteran Join Date: Apr 2005 Casino cash: $9805405	You have 2 options: A: You get your catches on a losing team while making $500 K - 8 million per year for years and years on end. Or B: You play on a winning superbowl team but your team runs the ball 90% of the time and you're not even a starter. Every year you're facing the reality of being cut and froced to take a real job or play football in the arena leagues for $50 k per year. Which situation do you think most players are gonna choose? The notion that players care about winning more then personal stats and accomplishments is a media creation. __________________ Who's decision was it to fire Romeo" - Coleman C Hunt: "It was my decision but it was one that Scott agreed with" LOL
Posts: 2,605