Does anything less than a playoff appearance = Bye Bye Pioli?

[Titty Meat]

This isn't a thread bashing Pioli it's simply to encourage discussion.

The Facts:

The Chiefs have finished in last place 2 out of the 3 seasons since Pioli took over.

The Chiefs have averaged 7 wins under the Pioli regime.

The 2009 draft= Fail

The Trade for Matt Cassel turns out it wasn't good.

Already fired one coach missing the playoffs this year with this squad would mean Crennel isn't that good of a coach.

So does anything less than a playoff appearance= failure? If so that would be 3 out of 4 years Pioli has failed. That gets you walking papers with most franchises.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by RunKC

I'm not worried about Pioli building the roster. He's done a great job. I have no worry off him replacing Bowe, Hali, DJ with good players via the draft or free agency.

Ok.


Good to know I guess. I don't have a problem thinking he can build the roster. He's done a good job thus far.


His problem is that he did it bass ackwards and didn't get the qb first. Or well, he did, just the wrong one.

[Dayze]

Trolls abound !

[Ace Gunner]

Originally Posted by milkman

The 2009 Lions, who finished the 2007 season with a perfect 0-16 record were ahead of the Chiefs?

While I am a believer in "you are what your record says you are" the fine line between 0 - 16 and 2 - 14 isn't worth arguing over.

When I watched the Lions play with Stafford that year and compared what I saw from them with the what I saw from the Chiefs that season, the Lions were quite a bit better.

The Lions were in a tough division then, facing Jared Allen & co plus Aaron Rodgers & co. and the Bears were decent then. The Chiefs were in perhaps the weakest division in the NFL.