Chiefs If you could sign Marcus Peters tomorrow.. - Page 9

pugsnotdrugs19 · 07:43 PM

to a 5-year $90M contract, would you want the Chiefs to do it?

I bring this up because it is an incredibly tough choice the Chiefs are having to ponder now. The highest paid corner in the league, Josh Norman, makes $15M per year. I am only estimating, but I would bet that extending Peters will take roughly $18M per year.

I think I would actually do it if I was Veach, and here is why. The sooner we can get it out of the way, the better. We're just buying back prime years. If they extend him now for 5 seasons, he will be 30 years old during the last season of the contract, his 9th NFL season.

Despite the occasional on-field antics, this kid has forced 25 turnovers (19 INTs, 6 FFs) in his first three regular seasons (46 games). TWENTY-FIVE. Absolutely incredible. Good for a turnover more than every other game. He's also had 2 INTs in his 4 playoff games.

I thought after the Jets game, when all hell had broke loose, that we should trade him. But, it seems like his teammates love him, so I don't think he is a 'cancer' by any means. Just very competitive.

Thoughts?

Sweet Daddy Hate · 01-22-2018, 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus

I know you believe this, for some weird reason, but those people do not exist, its just a CP built straw man.

Wrong. They are ALL OVER KCC.com, and regularly get their asses handed to them by Clay and others on FB.

These are the fools that believe the Chiefs must replicate the 2003 O-line at all costs because then, and only then, can Alex Smith take the Chiefs to the Super Bowl. They "just can't understand" why the Chiefs would "waste" so much draft capital to move up and grab a QB, when the Chiefs already "have a great QB"!

In short, morons.

**Baby Lee** · 01-23-2018, 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city

If you could essentially buy his last 2 years of a rookie deal and extend him at a decent rate like they did Kelce, I’d go ahead and do it.

If not I’d wait

Yeah, you don't want to back up the Brinks truck in hopes of having him 'forever' because longevity at corner is always precarious. But securing him early with a little sweetening to let him know he's loved is prudent. He's talented enough to 'lock down' and keep happy.

While I'm leery of a 10 year premium deal, I'm even more leery of the pressure of a pending free market for him a few years down the road.

01-20-2018, 07:12 PM
pugsnotdrugs19 SUPER BOWL CHAMPIONS Join Date: Aug 2013 Casino cash: $9129447	If you could sign Marcus Peters tomorrow.. to a 5-year $90M contract, would you want the Chiefs to do it? I bring this up because it is an incredibly tough choice the Chiefs are having to ponder now. The highest paid corner in the league, Josh Norman, makes $15M per year. I am only estimating, but I would bet that extending Peters will take roughly $18M per year. I think I would actually do it if I was Veach, and here is why. The sooner we can get it out of the way, the better. We're just buying back prime years. If they extend him now for 5 seasons, he will be 30 years old during the last season of the contract, his 9th NFL season. Despite the occasional on-field antics, this kid has forced 25 turnovers (19 INTs, 6 FFs) in his first three regular seasons (46 games). TWENTY-FIVE. Absolutely incredible. Good for a turnover more than every other game. He's also had 2 INTs in his 4 playoff games. I thought after the Jets game, when all hell had broke loose, that we should trade him. But, it seems like his teammates love him, so I don't think he is a 'cancer' by any means. Just very competitive. Thoughts? Last edited by pugsnotdrugs19; 01-20-2018 at 07:43 PM..
Posts: 26,377