FFL Who to start at QB?

chop · 10-15-2005, 04:31 PM

I have Brunell, Vick, and Harrington.

Who would you go with?

I went with a poll to get opinions from the lurkers.

KCChiefsMan · 10-15-2005, 04:35 PM

QBs seem to do pretty good against us, I'd probably play Brunell

Mr. Rat Fink · 10-15-2005, 04:36 PM

I'd go with Vick if he's healthy. The Saints defense is god awful. If he doesn't play, then I'd go with Brunell. Or maybe you could drop Harrington and pickup Schaub off the waiver wire...he'd post good #'s as well against New Orleans.

DenverChief · 10-15-2005, 04:46 PM

I don't think Vick will be playing, that said I would go with Brunell

DenverChief · 10-15-2005, 04:50 PM

Although Michael Vick returned to practice at midweek after sitting out the Falcons' loss to New England with a sprained right knee, coach Jim Mora did not immediately name him the starter. He was listed as questionable on Thursday's injury report.
(Updated 10/14/2005).

nfl.com

chop · 10-15-2005, 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Rat Fink

I'd go with Vick if he's healthy. The Saints defense is god awful. If he doesn't play, then I'd go with Brunell. Or maybe you could drop Harrington and pickup Schaub off the waiver wire...he'd post good #'s as well against New Orleans.

Someone has already picked him up.

Thig Lyfe · 10-15-2005, 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenverChief

Although Michael Vick returned to practice at midweek after sitting out the Falcons' loss to New England with a sprained right knee, coach Jim Mora did not immediately name him the starter. He was listed as questionable on Thursday's injury report.
(Updated 10/14/2005).

nfl.com

Questionable. Riiight.

Mr. Rat Fink · 10-15-2005, 05:13 PM

Eh, well, better go with Brunell I guess.

**RealSNR** · 10-15-2005, 05:52 PM

Personally, I'd go with either Vick, Harrington, or Brunell. But you could always pick a guy up on the waiver wire too, I guess.

Eleazar · 10-15-2005, 06:25 PM

Do you want the QB facing Carolina, the one facing pass-defense poor KC, or the one who throws a touchdown pass every two weeks and has injury questions?

Brunell seems the obvious choice to me.

Simplex3 · 10-15-2005, 07:11 PM

I have Favre and Big Ben, with Favre on bye and Big Ben doubtful to go I picked up Brunell. I think he's going to have a solid day, especially with Warfield inactive (Damnit Carl!

). The latest thing I read said that Vick is going to play but the Falcons are lying bags of s**t with their injury reports so you can't count on anything they say. So, Harrington is out because he sucks. Vick may or may not play and won't be 100% even if he does play. Brunell vs. a weak KC pass rush is your clear play.

Mile High Mania · 10-16-2005, 06:09 AM

You should drop Harrington ... he is the suck.

View Poll Results: Who to start at QB
Michael Vick	5	38.46%
Joey Harrington	0	0%
Mark Brunell	8	61.54%
Voters: 13. You may not vote on this poll

10-15-2005, 04:31 PM
chop Go Chiefs! Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Michigan Casino cash: $2644270	FFL Who to start at QB? I have Brunell, Vick, and Harrington. Who would you go with? I went with a poll to get opinions from the lurkers.
Posts: 2,946

10-15-2005, 04:35 PM	#2
KCChiefsMan AIC Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: West Roxbury, MA Casino cash: $10004900	QBs seem to do pretty good against us, I'd probably play Brunell
Posts: 11,478

10-15-2005, 04:36 PM	#3
Mr. Rat Fink therapist Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Hong Kong Casino cash: $10004900	I'd go with Vick if he's healthy. The Saints defense is god awful. If he doesn't play, then I'd go with Brunell. Or maybe you could drop Harrington and pickup Schaub off the waiver wire...he'd post good #'s as well against New Orleans.
Posts: 226

10-15-2005, 04:46 PM	#4
DenverChief MVP Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Rocky Ford Casino cash: $5629867	I don't think Vick will be playing, that said I would go with Brunell
Posts: 16,181

10-15-2005, 04:50 PM	#5
DenverChief MVP Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Rocky Ford Casino cash: $5629867	Although Michael Vick returned to practice at midweek after sitting out the Falcons' loss to New England with a sprained right knee, coach Jim Mora did not immediately name him the starter. He was listed as questionable on Thursday's injury report. (Updated 10/14/2005). nfl.com
Posts: 16,181

10-15-2005, 05:13 PM	#8
Mr. Rat Fink therapist Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Hong Kong Casino cash: $10004900	Eh, well, better go with Brunell I guess.
Posts: 226

10-15-2005, 06:25 PM	#10
Eleazar Beyond the Rapids Join Date: May 2003 Location: Langley, VA Casino cash: $-370000	Do you want the QB facing Carolina, the one facing pass-defense poor KC, or the one who throws a touchdown pass every two weeks and has injury questions? Brunell seems the obvious choice to me.
Posts: 80,659

10-15-2005, 07:11 PM	#11
Simplex3 MVP Join Date: Sep 2003 Casino cash: $10004900	I have Favre and Big Ben, with Favre on bye and Big Ben doubtful to go I picked up Brunell. I think he's going to have a solid day, especially with Warfield inactive (Damnit Carl! ). The latest thing I read said that Vick is going to play but the Falcons are lying bags of s**t with their injury reports so you can't count on anything they say. So, Harrington is out because he sucks. Vick may or may not play and won't be 100% even if he does play. Brunell vs. a weak KC pass rush is your clear play.
Posts: 28,527

10-16-2005, 06:09 AM	#12
Mile High Mania #triggering Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Tejas Casino cash: $3437229	You should drop Harrington ... he is the suck. __________________
Posts: 30,346