|
08-09-2011, 10:55 AM | #2 |
Most Valuable Villain
Join Date: Dec 2006
Casino cash: $2645047
|
What do you lose for keeping the players?
I'd go with Rodgers and Charles. |
Posts: 92,308
|
08-09-2011, 11:10 AM | #3 |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: In the Holler
Casino cash: $10004950
|
Also depends on your leagues scoring format. In a PPR league you have a couple of options.
|
Posts: 4,983
|
08-09-2011, 11:52 AM | #4 |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Casino cash: $450000
|
|
Posts: 6,764
|
08-09-2011, 11:57 AM | #5 |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Casino cash: $450000
|
|
Posts: 6,764
|
08-09-2011, 12:57 PM | #6 |
Damn it feels good.
Join Date: Mar 2011
Casino cash: $7547978
|
Rodgers and Charles. Other than that, the only option I'd probably consider is Gates.
|
Posts: 3,305
|
08-09-2011, 12:58 PM | #7 |
Hello
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South Dakota
Casino cash: $632096
VARSITY
|
Rodgers and Charles. Not a very hard choice at all.
|
Posts: 23,239
|
08-09-2011, 12:58 PM | #8 |
Hello
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South Dakota
Casino cash: $632096
VARSITY
|
|
Posts: 23,239
|
08-12-2011, 02:28 PM | #9 |
M-I-Z S-E-C
Join Date: Apr 2009
Casino cash: $10004927
|
So you'd really consider taking a TE over a legit top 3 overall option?
|
Posts: 6,039
|
08-12-2011, 04:02 PM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Olathe
Casino cash: $10003166
|
Welker or Charles, up to you. Going to go either way on that one, but I'd be inclined to take Charles.
|
Posts: 2,327
|
08-12-2011, 05:53 PM | #11 |
Go Chiefs!
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Michigan
Casino cash: $2634270
|
I would take everyone else on the list before I would take Welker. Welker was only average last year. Two years ago I would take Welker.
__________________
Never be satisfied with what you achieve, because it all pales in comparison with what you are capable of doing in the future. |
Posts: 2,946
|
|
|