Chiefs Ok so I'm curious if this scenario happens

chiefscafan · 03-02-2013, 12:58 PM

What if Oakland wants geno but jets , buffalo, and cardinals want him.

Those who know draft compensation what could we realistically get for trading down.

Mother****erJones · 03-02-2013, 01:00 PM

It depends on how much they really want him. Which isnt much I'm guessing because he isn't heavily coveted. Hopefully we could get a 2nd and next years 1 for moving back far enough

Hog's Gone Fishin · 03-02-2013, 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dtchiefs4life

It depends on how much they really want him. Which isnt much I'm guessing because he isn't heavily coveted. Hopefully we could get a 2nd and next years 1 for moving back far enough

This , so we can draft Johnny Football and finally have our QBOTF.

Mr_Tomahawk · 03-02-2013, 01:00 PM

Alex Smith.

**TribalElder** · 03-02-2013, 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk

Alex Smith Sucks.

fixed

**Mr. Flopnuts** · 03-02-2013, 01:00 PM

The number 2 pick is worth less points than the 1. Why not just trade with Jacksonville? That's what we've done to ourselves. Again.

Rasputin · 03-02-2013, 01:02 PM

I agree with Mr.Flopnuts Jags are the team that could score a deal to move back. Teams know we wont draft a QB and are lame ducks with picking LT Jackoff (sp)

philfree · 03-02-2013, 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo

I agree with Mr.Flopnuts Jags are the team that could score a deal to move back. Teams know we wont draft a QB and are lame ducks with picking LT Jackoff (sp)

If there's two or three teams wanting Geno Smith I'm not sure trading up to #2 will cut it unless that happens after we've already made our pick. I would think that if a team is counting on G. Smith for their QB they'd want to secure him before the draft. The only way that happens is by trading up to #1.

Direckshun · 03-02-2013, 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo

I agree with Mr.Flopnuts Jags are the team that could score a deal to move back. Teams know we wont draft a QB and are lame ducks with picking LT Jackoff (sp)

People forget the Jags have a new head coach who has no loyalty to Gabbert.

B14ckmon · 03-02-2013, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indignayshun

People forget the Jags have a new head coach who has no loyalty to Gabbert.

And a new GM who was helping Dimitroff when they took Matt Ryan

Direckshun · 03-02-2013, 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by B14ckmon

And a new GM who was helping Dimitroff when they took Matt Ryan

Yup.

The Jags are also openly saying they want to build around Gabbert, which is a sign as well.

The Jags probably want a QB. I don't know if that means they won't take one, but it does mean they won't be looking to trade down.

In which case, the cheese stands alone at the top of the draft if you're looking for a trade partner.

philfree · 03-02-2013, 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indignayshun

People forget the Jags have a new head coach who has no loyalty to Gabbert.

That's right so if a team wants G. Smith they have to get to #1.

After the disappointment of apparently not going with Geno a good draft could help sooth some of that. The 1st step to that is moving that 1st pick so we get back into the 2nd round this year and netting a 1st next year and hopefully more then that. After that we have to nail our picks. None the less this is where I'm at in the 2013 offseason. If we're not taking Geno then we must get that trade done.

B14ckmon · 03-02-2013, 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree

That's right so if a team wants G. Smith they have to get to #1.

After the disappointment of apparently not going with Geno a good draft could help sooth some of that. The 1st step to that is moving that 1st pick so we get back into the 2nd round this year and netting a 1st next year and hopefully more then that. After that we have to nail our picks. None the less this is where I'm at in the 2013 offseason. If we're not taking Geno then we must get that trade done.

...There is 0 chance the Chiefs are taking Geno. And everyone knows it.

melbar · 03-02-2013, 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Indignayshun

People forget the Jags have a new head coach who has no loyalty to Gabbert.

As long as there's a chance the Jags want a QB you have to jump them. The deal would depend on how far down you go. Any deal should involve next years 1 and a swap of 1's for this year base package. Extra picks depend on how far down IMO...

Chiefshrink · 03-02-2013, 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by melbar

As long as there's a chance the Jags want a QB you have to jump them.

This. The Jags need a QB about as bad as we do and how in the hell do you pass on Geno ? I say if Andy/John were smart they would be quietly playing the "Jags will take Geno card" to Buffalo,Philly,Jets and the Browns and playing that card hard.

03-02-2013, 12:58 PM	Topic Starter
chiefscafan Veteran Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: manhattan beach, CA Casino cash: $9688215	Ok so I'm curious if this scenario happens What if Oakland wants geno but jets , buffalo, and cardinals want him. Those who know draft compensation what could we realistically get for trading down.
Posts: 4,425

03-02-2013, 01:00 PM	#4
Mr_Tomahawk Prestige Worldwide Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Spring Hill, KS Casino cash: $2790526	Alex Smith. __________________ Adopt-A-Chief: John Dorsey
Posts: 18,406

03-02-2013, 01:00 PM	#6
Mr. Flopnuts FINALLY! The wait is over. Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: The Future Is Now!!! Casino cash: $19947565	The number 2 pick is worth less points than the 1. Why not just trade with Jacksonville? That's what we've done to ourselves. Again.
Posts: 56,649

03-02-2013, 01:02 PM	#7
Rasputin Tip of the hat LIV Champs Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: ks Casino cash: $3245421	I agree with Mr.Flopnuts Jags are the team that could score a deal to move back. Teams know we wont draft a QB and are lame ducks with picking LT Jackoff (sp)
Posts: 54,981