Football HOF question - Reeves vs Dungy

Mile High Mania · 07-06-2010, 01:16 PM

I saw a poll recently that asked the question of whether or not either of these coaches was a "Hall of Fame" coach. Tony Dungy was an overwhelming "YES" and Reeves was extremely borderline.

You can compare their bodies of work at www.profootballreference.com

What do you guys think?

Micjones · 07-06-2010, 01:23 PM

Dungy.
-10 fewer years and only one less Division Title.
-10 fewer years about only 51 fewer games.
-Superbowl ring.
-Only had double digit losses in one season his entire career.
-Twice as many wins as losses.

Brock · 07-06-2010, 01:25 PM

For some reason, Marv Levy is in, so I don't see why Reeves shouldn't be.

mikey23545 · 07-06-2010, 01:31 PM

I would probably lean towards Reeves...A lot longer career, went to 4 Super Bowls with 2 different teams, a lot more wins.

Sure, Dungy won one SB, and has a better winning percentage but I think longevity with a long record of winning teams trumps that.

Barely.

Mile High Mania · 07-06-2010, 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones

Dungy.
-10 fewer years and only one less Division Title.
-10 fewer years about only 51 fewer games.
-Superbowl ring.
-Only had double digit losses in one season his entire career.
-Twice as many wins as losses.

Sure, but prior to coaching Peyton Manning, Dungy was 45-42 overall with the Bucs. Dungy takes over Indy, in Peyton's 5th season and they go on a roll. Dungy took over a pretty loaded roster.

Dan Reeves didn't do too much after Denver, aside from a few good seasons and the SB appearance... but, overall he still has a very solid body of work and like someone else said, Levy is in the HOF.

I'm not suggesting that Dungy isn't qualified, but if he's a lock now... they better put in Jimmy Johnson pretty fast with his record of 80 and 64 with 2 titles. Hell, Barry Switzer was 64-40 in his 4 years with a SB title. Switzer did the same thing Dungy did ... took over a very talented team.

**HemiEd** · 07-06-2010, 03:55 PM

I don't think either one of them belong in the HOF. Dungy had a great QB and is a feel good story, but that shouldn't give him the ticket in. Reeves was a hard worker, for a long time, but not enough IMO.

For the life of me, I can't figure out why Levy made it, but he is an extremely smart ****er, so he managed to politic the right people.

**cdcox** · 07-06-2010, 04:04 PM

I wouldn't put either one of them in.

Bud Grant also seems to be a question mark. No championships, no major innovations, 21st in regular season win %, 12th in total wins. I just don't see it.

Sanka · 07-06-2010, 04:07 PM

Dungy is a fruad. Peyton should have won more titles if he had a better HC.

**CrazyPhuD** · 07-06-2010, 04:16 PM

Dungy's black he's going in....

\thread

-King- · 07-06-2010, 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sanka

Dungy is a fruad. Peyton should have won more titles if he had a better HC.

Or if he wasnt a **** up in the post season. Just a thought.
Posted via Mobile Device

**Rain Man** · 07-06-2010, 04:34 PM

I'd vote for Reeves over Dungy, but I think a coach has to be legendary to get in. Neither of those coaches is legendary.

-King- · 07-06-2010, 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man

I'd vote for Reeves over Dungy, but I think a coach has to be legendary to get in. Neither of those coaches is legendary.

This.
Posted via Mobile Device

**Saul Good** · 07-06-2010, 07:05 PM

Reeves couldn't co-exist with one of the 3 best QBs in the history of the game. No HOF.

ClevelandBronco · 07-06-2010, 07:08 PM

Neither one.

Zebedee DuBois · 07-06-2010, 07:21 PM

If either gets in, they would be riding in on their QB's talent. ...although there is something to be said for the ability to get out of the way so a player's talent can shine.

07-06-2010, 01:16 PM
Mile High Mania #triggering Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Tejas Casino cash: $1067229	HOF question - Reeves vs Dungy I saw a poll recently that asked the question of whether or not either of these coaches was a "Hall of Fame" coach. Tony Dungy was an overwhelming "YES" and Reeves was extremely borderline. You can compare their bodies of work at www.profootballreference.com What do you guys think?
Posts: 30,894

07-06-2010, 01:23 PM	#2
Micjones Whose house? Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: KCMO Casino cash: $10005180	Dungy. -10 fewer years and only one less Division Title. -10 fewer years about only 51 fewer games. -Superbowl ring. -Only had double digit losses in one season his entire career. -Twice as many wins as losses. __________________ It's like when I'm right I'm right, when I'm wrong I could been right, so I'm still right cause I coulda been wrong.
Posts: 15,344

07-06-2010, 01:25 PM	#3
Brock Say hello to my little friend Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Larryville Casino cash: $9598422	For some reason, Marv Levy is in, so I don't see why Reeves shouldn't be.
Posts: 47,314

07-06-2010, 01:31 PM	#4
mikey23545 MVP Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $10015321	I would probably lean towards Reeves...A lot longer career, went to 4 Super Bowls with 2 different teams, a lot more wins. Sure, Dungy won one SB, and has a better winning percentage but I think longevity with a long record of winning teams trumps that. Barely.
Posts: 12,314

07-06-2010, 03:55 PM	#6
HemiEd Supporter Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Ozarks Casino cash: $-319436	I don't think either one of them belong in the HOF. Dungy had a great QB and is a feel good story, but that shouldn't give him the ticket in. Reeves was a hard worker, for a long time, but not enough IMO. For the life of me, I can't figure out why Levy made it, but he is an extremely smart ****er, so he managed to politic the right people.
Posts: 34,815

07-06-2010, 04:04 PM	#7
cdcox www.nfl-forecast.com Join Date: Sep 2000 Casino cash: $-478231	I wouldn't put either one of them in. Bud Grant also seems to be a question mark. No championships, no major innovations, 21st in regular season win %, 12th in total wins. I just don't see it.
Posts: 46,032

07-06-2010, 04:07 PM	#8
Sanka Veteran Join Date: May 2007 Casino cash: $-1363023	Dungy is a fruad. Peyton should have won more titles if he had a better HC.
Posts: 1,207

07-06-2010, 04:16 PM	#9
CrazyPhuD Meow Join Date: Jun 2005 Casino cash: $10005050	Dungy's black he's going in.... \thread __________________ "Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t*rd by the clean end"
Posts: 8,523

07-06-2010, 04:34 PM	#11
Rain Man Seize life. Be an ermine. Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: My house Casino cash: $-492449 VARSITY	I'd vote for Reeves over Dungy, but I think a coach has to be legendary to get in. Neither of those coaches is legendary. __________________ Active fan of the greatest team in NFL history.
Posts: 145,290

07-06-2010, 07:05 PM	#13
Saul Good Quit your bullshit Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Bored of winning Casino cash: $10052799	Reeves couldn't co-exist with one of the 3 best QBs in the history of the game. No HOF. __________________ Today is not a good day to be a pussy.
Posts: 41,870

07-06-2010, 07:08 PM	#14
ClevelandBronco I'm with the banned. Join Date: Sep 2006 Casino cash: $5658955	Neither one. __________________ "Faith and reason are like two wings on which the human spirit rises to the contemplation of truth ..." – Pope Saint John Paul II
Posts: 28,113

07-06-2010, 07:21 PM	#15
Zebedee DuBois Veteran Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: floating in a tin can Casino cash: $-1684801	If either gets in, they would be riding in on their QB's talent. ...although there is something to be said for the ability to get out of the way so a player's talent can shine. __________________ What am I even doing here?
Posts: 3,932