Chiefs Charles and Jones

**DeezNutz** · 11-07-2010, 07:25 PM

10 for 53 (5.3 per)
19 for 32 (1.7 per)

If we operate under the assumption that the coaches aren't ****ing stupid, how do we explain the use of these two players today?

Titty Meat · 11-07-2010, 07:29 PM

Simple Deez one is a leader the other isn't.

bowener · 11-07-2010, 07:30 PM

The were used poorly?

Did I answer wrong?

-King- · 11-07-2010, 07:31 PM

Great thread dude.

Shag · 11-07-2010, 07:31 PM

It's unexplainable, IMHO. This is the first week I've had a real problem with the distribution of the RB load. I'm curious who makes the call on who is in the game - is it Weis? Haley? Carthon?

It was painfully obvious that TJ wasn't the answer today - I don't understand why they kept beating their heads against a brick wall...

lazepoo · 11-07-2010, 07:32 PM

The field looked sloppy, and Jones is supposed to be stronger between the tackles. Maybe they thought things would open up as the game wore on.

Coach · 11-07-2010, 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shag

It's unexplainable, IMHO. This is the first week I've had a real problem with the distribution of the RB load. I'm curious who makes the call on who is in the game - is it Weis? Haley? Carthon?

It was painfully obvious that TJ wasn't the answer today - I don't understand why they kept beating their heads against a brick wall...

Didn't help when our offensive line was getting destroyed at the POA (point of attack) when Jones was in there.

And Brian Waters got his ass gif'ed up like 3 times today. He was terrible today.

**doomy3** · 11-07-2010, 07:32 PM

I definitely wish Charles was getting more carries.

However, it seemed that today he was banged up or something. On at least half his carries he got up slowly, or limped off the field. Not sure he was 100%.

suds79 · 11-07-2010, 07:33 PM

I hear what you're saying but Thomas didn't get much help along the way.

Seymour beat up on Waters all day.

**Rain Man** · 11-07-2010, 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach

Didn't help when our offensive line was getting destroyed at the POA (point of attack) when Jones was in there.

And Brian Waters got his ass gif'ed up like 3 times today. He was terrible today.

Yeah, that was a problem.

On the surface, it would seem like Jones was the right move given the rain, but by the fourth quarter when Charles is averaging 4 more yards per carry, it seems like they would change it up. The same thing happened in Buffalo last week.

craneref · 11-07-2010, 07:35 PM

I agree that our line sucked today, rarely got any push and let the Raiders walk itno the backfield. The Raiders just wanted the line of scrimmage more than the Chiefs Offensive line did and that is unexcusible!

meitze · 11-07-2010, 07:35 PM

Charles is clearly a star, but the stupid offensive coordinator has a man crush on Jones. You wouldn't leave Chris Johnson on the bench and Charles has the same potential. If you don't play him your wasting his talent and he should be traded. Charles could have lead this team to a victory if the carries were reversed. 10 carries? He had more yards on 10 carries than Jones did on 19! Did the coaching staff forget what Charles did last week?? It's insane not to use this guy more. It's stupid and it's ashame for Chiefs fans because he could be the best offense on the team. What a waste!

Swanman · 11-07-2010, 07:35 PM

When the offensive line is playing like ass, then Charles is the guy that needs to be in there. He just needs a little sliver of opening and he will get his yards. Jones doesn't have the speed or shiftiness to make chicken salad from chicken shit.

theultimatekcchiefsfan · 11-07-2010, 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach

Didn't help when our offensive line was getting destroyed at the POA (point of attack) when Jones was in there.

And Brian Waters got his ass gif'ed up like 3 times today. He was terrible today.

Brian Waters got shoved around by Seymore al day long. Completely overmatched.

**DeezNutz** · 11-07-2010, 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3

I definitely wish Charles was getting more carries.

However, it seemed that today he was banged up or something. On at least half his carries he got up slowly, or limped off the field. Not sure he was 100%.

Definitely could be some truthiness there.

However, if I'm not mistaken, Charles had one carry in the first quarter, and this is inexcusable.

11-07-2010, 07:25 PM
DeezNutz PermaBanned Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Jouissance Casino cash: $10011570	Charles and Jones 10 for 53 (5.3 per) 19 for 32 (1.7 per) If we operate under the assumption that the coaches aren't ****ing stupid, how do we explain the use of these two players today?
Posts: 47,521

11-07-2010, 07:29 PM	#2
Titty Meat Inmem 2.0 Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: My house Casino cash: $1997558	Simple Deez one is a leader the other isn't.
Posts: 75,449

11-07-2010, 07:30 PM	#3
bowener BAMF! Join Date: Nov 2007 Casino cash: $9549897	The were used poorly? Did I answer wrong? __________________ Main Entry: bowe·ner Pronunciation: \ˈbō-nər\ Function: noun Date: circa 2007
Posts: 8,358

11-07-2010, 07:31 PM	#4
-King- ▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓ Join Date: Jan 2009 Casino cash: $2205743	Great thread dude. __________________ 🏁
Posts: 63,910

11-07-2010, 07:31 PM	#5
Shag MVP Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: San Diego, CA Casino cash: $1903342	It's unexplainable, IMHO. This is the first week I've had a real problem with the distribution of the RB load. I'm curious who makes the call on who is in the game - is it Weis? Haley? Carthon? It was painfully obvious that TJ wasn't the answer today - I don't understand why they kept beating their heads against a brick wall...
Posts: 5,152

11-07-2010, 07:32 PM	#8
doomy3 Supporter Join Date: Aug 2005 Casino cash: $5203539	I definitely wish Charles was getting more carries. However, it seemed that today he was banged up or something. On at least half his carries he got up slowly, or limped off the field. Not sure he was 100%.
Posts: 12,855

11-07-2010, 07:33 PM	#9
suds79 MVP Join Date: Sep 2000 Casino cash: $10005036	I hear what you're saying but Thomas didn't get much help along the way. Seymour beat up on Waters all day.
Posts: 5,747

11-07-2010, 07:35 PM	#11
craneref He Man bronco hater club Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Land of the Uneasy Calm Casino cash: $10004977	I agree that our line sucked today, rarely got any push and let the Raiders walk itno the backfield. The Raiders just wanted the line of scrimmage more than the Chiefs Offensive line did and that is unexcusible! __________________ I have two favorite teams, the CHIEFS and whoever play the broncos this week "I'd say the French and broncos were 'scumbags' but that would be a disservice to bags full of scum." - Dennis Miller -
Posts: 1,114

11-07-2010, 07:35 PM	#12
meitze Rookie Join Date: Nov 2010 Casino cash: $10004900	Jones and Charles Charles is clearly a star, but the stupid offensive coordinator has a man crush on Jones. You wouldn't leave Chris Johnson on the bench and Charles has the same potential. If you don't play him your wasting his talent and he should be traded. Charles could have lead this team to a victory if the carries were reversed. 10 carries? He had more yards on 10 carries than Jones did on 19! Did the coaching staff forget what Charles did last week?? It's insane not to use this guy more. It's stupid and it's ashame for Chiefs fans because he could be the best offense on the team. What a waste!
Posts: 2

11-07-2010, 07:35 PM	#13
Swanman It's a league game, Dude Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Itasca, IL Casino cash: $9967354	When the offensive line is playing like ass, then Charles is the guy that needs to be in there. He just needs a little sliver of opening and he will get his yards. Jones doesn't have the speed or shiftiness to make chicken salad from chicken shit.
Posts: 4,719