NFL Draft Well, We Probably Should Have a Brian Orakpo Thread... - Page 10

'Hamas' Jenkins · 11-09-2008, 07:08 PM

If we keep playing like this, we won't be in a position to draft Stafford. It's not good or bad, it is what it is.

With that being said, a genetic freak like Rak daddy would go a long way towards fixing the ills of this defense. He's not as long as Michael Johnson, but he's fast, explosive, and incredibly strong. Plus, he's taken boxing lessons, so Krumrie will love him with his ****tard slap-fight drill.

There could be worse selections in the 3-7 range where we will most likely choose.

Mr. Laz · 11-10-2008, 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare

Well it's the base for success, and if one doesn't have it there ass is grass.

lots of teams "make due" at offensive line

our Oline has been much better since we actually started running some kind of scheme that gives our lineman a chance.

if our linebackers and safeties could tackle worth a crap then our defensive line would be more acceptable too.

that said RDE and RT are 2 huge needs for us

tk13 · 11-10-2008, 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

How do you know that Branden Albert will excel at RT because he's good at LT? At this point, he's a much better pass blocker than a run blocker, and RT is the road grader position.

He wasn't even a LT in college. I think we could probably move him anywhere on the line except maybe center and he would probably hold his own. Maybe not, but the guy had the ability to go from being a college guard to good LT in the NFL, no small feat.

'Hamas' Jenkins · 11-10-2008, 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare

Well it's the base for success, and if one doesn't have it there ass is grass.

That's the offensive line for probably the greatest offense of all time. How many pro bowlers are on there? 2.

Timmerman made it once, and Pace is a HOF LT. All the other guys were journeyman or marginal players.

'Hamas' Jenkins · 11-10-2008, 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13

He wasn't even a LT in college. I think we could probably move him anywhere on the line except maybe center and he would probably hold his own. Maybe not, but the guy had the ability to go from being a college guard to good LT in the NFL, no small feat.

If the Bears were in position to draft Patrick Willis and they said "Well, you know, Urlacher played safety in college so we could move him out there." Would you support it?

The fact that he played guard in college means nothing. Maybe Monroe just wasn't versatile enough to play RT or inside, and Albert could play LG, so they put him there.

Before he was a tackle, he was considered a 2nd-3rd round prospect.

We could pick up a guy who could play guard or RT just as well as Albert in the 2nd or 3rd round and fill a position with a true impact player in the first.

**Tribal Warfare** · 11-10-2008, 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz

lots of teams "make due" at offensive line

Let see an average or solid line compared to a possible OL lineup that would make the opponent's shit their pants like the 90's Cowboys and the 2002-05 KC line which made their offense's into an exacting scoring juggernaut? I'd take the Cowboys or the Vermeil era KC Chiefs in comparison.

tk13 · 11-10-2008, 12:19 AM

You could very well be right. But of course the flipside argument to that is people act like offensive linemen are easy to find and grow on trees yet we haven't been able to put any kind of decent one together for about 3 years.

'Hamas' Jenkins · 11-10-2008, 12:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare

Let see an average or solid line compared to a possible OL lineup that would make the opponent's shit their pants like the 90's Cowboys and the 2002-05 KC line which made their offense's into an exacting scoring juggernaut? I'd take the Cowboys or the Vermeil era KC Chiefs in comparison.

It's a hell of a lot easier to have a line like the 90's Cowboys with no cap, FWIW...

That's also a different time. Lines were more important back then because you mug receivers and QBs needed more time for their men to get off the line and get open.

But that aside, look at the line that the Patriots and Colts have trotted out there. Not exactly chock full of badasses, yet it seems to work pretty well for them.

'Hamas' Jenkins · 11-10-2008, 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13

You could very well be right. But of course the flipside argument to that is people act like offensive linemen are easy to find and grow on trees yet we haven't been able to put any kind of decent one together for about 3 years.

Not easy to find does not = easy to find with 6th and 7th round draft picks.

How many lineman have we drafted with picks ranging from the 2nd to the 5th round in the last five years?

Any?

That's where you fill your interior line. Just because we've spent nothing on it doesn't mean it's hard to find in the draft. It just means we've drafted incompetently. It's why I went off the handle when we passed up Kalil and Satele for McBride.

**Tribal Warfare** · 11-10-2008, 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

It's a hell of a lot easier to have a line like the 90's Cowboys with no cap, FWIW...

That's also a different time. Lines were more important back then because you mug receivers and QBs needed more time for their men to get off the line and get open.

But that aside, look at the line that the Patriots and Colts have trotted out there. Not exactly chock full of badasses, yet it seems to work pretty well for them.

Yeah I guess your right the OL in it's whole should be ignored because we hit on one prospect. Yay, for mediocrity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Basileus777 · 11-10-2008, 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare

Yeah I guess your right the OL in it's whole should be ignored because we hit on one prospect. Yay, for mediocrity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Not spending a top 5 pick on a 2nd LT ≠ ignoring the entire oline

'Hamas' Jenkins · 11-10-2008, 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare

Let see an average or solid line compared to a possible OL lineup that would make the opponent's shit their pants like the 90's Cowboys and the 2002-05 KC line which made their offense's into an exacting scoring juggernaut? I'd take the Cowboys or the Vermeil era KC Chiefs in comparison.

'Hamas' Jenkins · 11-10-2008, 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare

Yeah I guess your right the OL in it's whole should be ignored because we hit on one prospect. Yay, for mediocrity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

That's just catastrophically reeruned.

**Tribal Warfare** · 11-10-2008, 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Basileus777

Not spending a top 5 pick on a 2nd LT =/ ignoring the entire oline

Yes it is, because if have more badass on the OL it will certainly help the health of the offense in a whole.

**Tribal Warfare** · 11-10-2008, 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

That's just catastrophically reeruned.

Yep, I guess one good OL drafted in the 1st is super , but if you can have two.... oooh god it's blasphemy

Basileus777 · 11-10-2008, 12:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare

Yep, I guess one good prospect but if you can have two.... oooh god it's blasphemy

How about having one of those prospects at DE or another position more important than LG or RT?

11-09-2008, 07:08 PM
'Hamas' Jenkins Now you've pissed me off! Join Date: Jan 2006 Casino cash: $7739572	Well, We Probably Should Have a Brian Orakpo Thread... If we keep playing like this, we won't be in a position to draft Stafford. It's not good or bad, it is what it is. With that being said, a genetic freak like Rak daddy would go a long way towards fixing the ills of this defense. He's not as long as Michael Johnson, but he's fast, explosive, and incredibly strong. Plus, he's taken boxing lessons, so Krumrie will love him with his ****tard slap-fight drill. There could be worse selections in the 3-7 range where we will most likely choose.
Posts: 74,934

11-10-2008, 12:19 AM	#141
tk13 ... Join Date: Nov 2001 Casino cash: $512500	You could very well be right. But of course the flipside argument to that is people act like offensive linemen are easy to find and grow on trees yet we haven't been able to put any kind of decent one together for about 3 years.
Posts: 55,507