Chiefs Weird rumor about the Chiefs getting Seymour

JD10367 · 09-07-2009, 01:57 PM

Found this on Patsfans.com, don't know where it came from, but it would be f**king hilarious...

http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-...done-deal.html

Post #5:

They're saying that Seymour could end up going to KC for their 2010 #2, without saying more about what is written there it sounds like the Patriots could probably fall back on that if they wanted and the assumption (by me) is it depends if they want to do that or push the Raider deal, presumably with the 5 day letter which would leave Seymour little choice but to report.

corandval · 09-07-2009, 01:59 PM

That would be great!

**OnTheWarpath15** · 09-07-2009, 02:02 PM

What am I missing here?

Is the Seymour trade not final?

And even if it's not, how ****ing stupid would it be to invest ANOTHER high draft pick in a goddamn 5-technique?

JD10367 · 09-07-2009, 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

What am I missing here?

Is the Seymour trade not final?

And even if it's not, how ****ing stupid would it be to invest ANOTHER high draft pick in a goddamn 5-technique?

Why am I not surprised by this post? Some of you, man, you're unbelievable. Mention a rumor that the Chiefs might get Seymour for a 2nd-rounder, which would be a pretty good deal for them, and not five minutes later it's already labeled as a stupid move. I swear, if Pioli traded for Tom Brady and Peyton Manning, someone here would complain that the #3 QB sucks ass, LOL...

**RealSNR** · 09-07-2009, 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JD10367

Why am I not surprised by this post? Some of you, man, you're unbelievable. Mention a rumor that the Chiefs might get Seymour for a 2nd-rounder, which would be a pretty good deal for them, and not five minutes later it's already labeled as a stupid move. I swear, if Pioli traded for Tom Brady and Peyton Manning, someone here would complain that the #3 QB sucks ass, LOL...

Tyson Jackson- #3 overall
Glenn Dorsey- #5 overall

Are we spending a 2nd rounder on a backup or what? That would be stupid, especially a 30+ year old backup.

RedThat · 09-07-2009, 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR

Tyson Jackson- #3 overall
Glenn Dorsey- #5 overall

Are we spending a 2nd rounder on a backup or what? That would be stupid, especially a 30+ year old backup.

Are you calling Seymour a backup? thats crazy

Quesadilla Joe · 09-08-2009, 02:49 AM

Quote:

I have talked to about 10 different league sources and not one thinks that Seymour was worth a future 1

http://twitter.com/MoveTheSticks/status/3818953868

**OnTheWarpath15** · 09-07-2009, 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JD10367

Why am I not surprised by this post? Some of you, man, you're unbelievable. Mention a rumor that the Chiefs might get Seymour for a 2nd-rounder, which would be a pretty good deal for them, and not five minutes later it's already labeled as a stupid move. I swear, if Pioli traded for Tom Brady and Peyton Manning, someone here would complain that the #3 QB sucks ass, LOL...

How do you see that being a good move for KC?

How many high draft picks to we have to spend on a complementary position?

We've already invested the 3rd overall pick, the 5th overall pick and a high 3rd rounder on ****ing 5-techniques in the past two drafts.

Now you're suggesting that we spend a 2nd on another?

JD10367 · 09-07-2009, 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

How do you see that being a good move for KC?

How many high draft picks to we have to spend on a complementary position?

We've already invested the 3rd overall pick, the 5th overall pick and a high 3rd rounder on ****ing 5-techniques in the past two drafts.

Now you're suggesting that we spend a 2nd on another?

Let me follow that logic: a team has already used a high pick on a position. The use of that pick, on that particular player, may or may not have been a good decision. As a result, if you have an opportunity to upgrade by adding a Pro Bowler at a fair price, you shouldn't do it. Uh, okay. That's the kind of thinking that your last regime had: keep the players we drafted, no matter how good or bad they are, 'cause we'll look bad if we don't.

You have to have a more Belichickian philosophy. You don't compound one mistake with another. Draft Kevin O'Connell in the third round, and don't like how it worked out? Cut him. Sign Zach Taylor and Amani Toomer, and get the fans interested, but decide their tanks are empty? Send them on their way as quickly as you brought them in. It's about upgrading. A Raider 1st for Seymour is a butt-raping of Oakland; a KC 2nd for Seymour is a pretty damn good deal, IMO (especially since I think KC will be around .500 so that 2010 pick would be mid-round). Who gives a fat flying f**k what technique he plays, whether he plays DT or DE, whatever... on your defense, at the price of a 2nd rounder--AND, assuming you can re-sign him to a fair contract--that's a very solid pickup, no? Who else you've drafted and where you drafted them is irrelevant, I would think.

KCrockaholic · 09-07-2009, 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

What am I missing here?

Is the Seymour trade not final?

Im wondering the same thing.

LTL · 09-07-2009, 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life

Im wondering the same thing.

He hasn't reported to Oakland yet....and hasn't made any kind of indication that he will do so either.

JD10367 · 09-07-2009, 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LTL

He hasn't reported to Oakland yet....and hasn't made any kind of indication that he will do so either.

Would you, LOL? I can't blame the guy. Shit, he might take less money to NOT go to Oakland.

Mr. Krab · 09-07-2009, 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LTL

He hasn't reported to Oakland yet....and hasn't made any kind of indication that he will do so either.

n00b alert!!!

Did you read the n00b thread before posting, young man?!?!

09-07-2009, 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LTL

He hasn't reported to Oakland yet....and hasn't made any kind of indication that he will do so either.

haha, thats funny.

'Hamas' Jenkins · 09-07-2009, 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

What am I missing here?

Is the Seymour trade not final?

And even if it's not, how ****ing stupid would it be to invest ANOTHER high draft pick in a goddamn 5-technique?

It would be high comedy, there's no doubt.

09-07-2009, 01:57 PM	Topic Starter
JD10367 Cheaterlover* Join Date: May 2009 Location: RI Casino cash: $10010716	Weird rumor about the Chiefs getting Seymour Found this on Patsfans.com, don't know where it came from, but it would be f**king hilarious... http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-...done-deal.html Post #5: They're saying that Seymour could end up going to KC for their 2010 #2, without saying more about what is written there it sounds like the Patriots could probably fall back on that if they wanted and the assumption (by me) is it depends if they want to do that or push the Raider deal, presumably with the 5 day letter which would leave Seymour little choice but to report.
Posts: 12,916

09-07-2009, 01:59 PM	#2
corandval Chief fan 4 life! Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Hastings, Minnesota Casino cash: $10004900	That would be great!
Posts: 130

09-07-2009, 02:02 PM	#3
OnTheWarpath15 MVP Join Date: Sep 2005 Casino cash: $2231115	What am I missing here? Is the Seymour trade not final? And even if it's not, how ****ing stupid would it be to invest ANOTHER high draft pick in a goddamn 5-technique?
Posts: 60,746