Chiefs Ha Teicher is one of the funniest dudes ever.. - Page 10

Mecca · 12-23-2008, 05:34 PM

So I flip on 610...This is what I hear him saying..

From talking to people out there with having the 2nd or 3rd pick, I think they'll take a QB, they've been talking that it's time to do that. Big mistake, they need an end, some LB's and some OL.

And he just goes on about how they need those things far more than QB...

Adam Teicher a true fan bitching about the Chiefs coming to terms with using a high pick on a QB.

bowener · 12-23-2008, 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

From what I understand the Rams wanted Jake Long in the worst way last year so OT is not out of the question for them.

So in that scenario, Stafford falls to us. Is he truly worth the #3 pick?

Mecca · 12-23-2008, 08:43 PM

If you want a top 5 pick RT, we can just sign Mike Williams he's looking for a job...yet another reason I don't like drafting Texas players.

Pasta Little Brioni · 12-23-2008, 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

From what I understand the Rams wanted Jake Long in the worst way last year so OT is not out of the question for them.

I can see them taking LT, but Bulger has been brutal the last 2 years. I could easily see them going QB or LT as bad as thier line has been as well.

Mecca · 12-23-2008, 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bowener

So in that scenario, Stafford falls to us. Is he truly worth the #3 pick?

Sure I'd take the guy, he wouldn't be throwing wounded ducks on a cold Sunday I know that much.

Mecca · 12-23-2008, 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM

I can see them taking LT, but Bulger has been brutal the last 2 years. I could easily see them going QB or LT as bad as thier line has been as well.

They have a cap issue with drafting a QB, Bulger has a ton of money left on his deal and I've heard their new GM may be a guy they just promote from within which would lead to them likely trying to put guys in front of Bulger.

bowener · 12-23-2008, 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

Sure I'd take the guy, he wouldn't be throwing wounded ducks on a cold Sunday I know that much.

Ok, thanks. That scenario doesn't seem to outside of the ordinary, especially when you take a look around the league and see how well the LT's played as rookies this year. I think Detroit will want in on some of that, and the Rams will have to settle for second best, and I guess we get our QB.

RustShack · 12-23-2008, 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bowener

So in that scenario, Stafford falls to us. Is he truly worth the #3 pick?

I'd take hiim with the #1 pick...

Pasta Little Brioni · 12-23-2008, 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

They have a cap issue with drafting a QB, Bulger has a ton of money left on his deal and I've heard their new GM may be a guy they just promote from within which would lead to them likely trying to put guys in front of Bulger.

Well if you were a GM, would you settle for subpar QB play when you have the chance to draft a franchise QB top 3?? Unless you actually believe Bulger would be fine with a better line. They do need a LT as Pace is pretty much done though. I see what you are saying, but I'm not convinced they pass on a QB.

Mecca · 12-23-2008, 08:48 PM

Lots of weird things could happen, if the Lions don't take Stafford I don't think the Rams would.

If the Lions go with the "physical football approach" and do the whole Dolphins thing then their first pick won't be a QB.

I think the Rams would value OT's and then possibly Aaron Curry to put behind their 2 high pick linemen from the last 2 years.

Mecca · 12-23-2008, 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM

Well if you were a GM, would you settle for subpar QB play when you have the chance to draft a franchise QB top 3?? Unless you actually believe Bulger would be fine with a better line. They do need a LT as Pace is pretty much done though. I see what you are saying, but I'm not convinced they pass on a QB.

When he has 30 million dollars left on his contract it's pretty hard to just throw him away.

Sweet Daddy Hate · 12-23-2008, 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJizzles

Because, do you think IF Kitna doesn't return they'll go into the season with Culpepper and Orlovsky?

Just being hypothetical is all. Personally, I think it would be dumb for Detroit to NOT select Stafford. However, I would not be surprised.

I didn't know Kitna was FA after this year; that sucks. I thought the Lions would take Stafford just because it's the smart move in the long run for their franchise, I didn't know they were actually going to need a guy.

If that's the case, the only way the Chiefs will land Stafford is he holds off another year, or we use the Hunt's "Stafford / Texas" connections AND give away the entire ****ing house to Detroit and whoever lands in the number 2.
And I can guarantee you; somehow or another, we will lose Gonzales in this.

Mecca · 12-23-2008, 08:53 PM

The Lions could play this 1 of 2 ways.....they could see that Miami was awful last year, and now made the playoffs and decide go to that route by taking an OT, signing a QB and some other lower priced vets.

Pasta Little Brioni · 12-23-2008, 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

When he has 30 million dollars left on his contract it's pretty hard to just throw him away.

So, you just continue to throw him out there when he clearly has not lived up to that contract? Have you seen him play the last 2 years, because if he was a Chief i guarentee you'd want him gone.

Sweet Daddy Hate · 12-23-2008, 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hydrae

And I am sure you will effect this change from the Planet. Keep up the good work, I am glad you got Carl removed before he did too much damage.

This is no different( minus the salaries of course )than what the radio guys do. And I'll tell you this right now; over the course of this season, I've heard a LOT of message board parroting coming over the airwaves.

Positions that certain radio guys never took or touched, are now spewing forth from their mouths on a daily basis*.

People look at this shit more than you think.

*Petro, you ****in' Ass Pirate.

Mecca · 12-23-2008, 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM

So, you just continue to throw him out there when he clearly has not lived up to that contract? Have you seen him play the last 2 years, because if he was a Chief i guarentee you'd want him gone.

You can't logically have 130 million dollars of QB on your roster. I know what you're saying but cap implications and financial reasons also play into decisions.

12-23-2008, 05:34 PM
Mecca Hockey Town Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Kansas City, Missouri Casino cash: $-662950	Ha Teicher is one of the funniest dudes ever.. So I flip on 610...This is what I hear him saying.. From talking to people out there with having the 2nd or 3rd pick, I think they'll take a QB, they've been talking that it's time to do that. Big mistake, they need an end, some LB's and some OL. And he just goes on about how they need those things far more than QB... Adam Teicher a true fan bitching about the Chiefs coming to terms with using a high pick on a QB.
Posts: 115,346

12-23-2008, 08:43 PM	#137
Mecca Hockey Town Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Kansas City, Missouri Casino cash: $-662950	If you want a top 5 pick RT, we can just sign Mike Williams he's looking for a job...yet another reason I don't like drafting Texas players.
Posts: 115,346

12-23-2008, 08:48 PM	#144
Mecca Hockey Town Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Kansas City, Missouri Casino cash: $-662950	Lots of weird things could happen, if the Lions don't take Stafford I don't think the Rams would. If the Lions go with the "physical football approach" and do the whole Dolphins thing then their first pick won't be a QB. I think the Rams would value OT's and then possibly Aaron Curry to put behind their 2 high pick linemen from the last 2 years.
Posts: 115,346

12-23-2008, 08:53 PM	#147
Mecca Hockey Town Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Kansas City, Missouri Casino cash: $-662950	The Lions could play this 1 of 2 ways.....they could see that Miami was awful last year, and now made the playoffs and decide go to that route by taking an OT, signing a QB and some other lower priced vets.
Posts: 115,346