Chiefs Ha Teicher is one of the funniest dudes ever.. - Page 9

Mecca · 12-23-2008, 05:34 PM

So I flip on 610...This is what I hear him saying..

From talking to people out there with having the 2nd or 3rd pick, I think they'll take a QB, they've been talking that it's time to do that. Big mistake, they need an end, some LB's and some OL.

And he just goes on about how they need those things far more than QB...

Adam Teicher a true fan bitching about the Chiefs coming to terms with using a high pick on a QB.

aturnis · 12-23-2008, 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC

Well Mecca, we all have our fans and stalkers... Its just a price you pay for being so good...

Ceej · 12-23-2008, 08:33 PM

Haha, then quit dodging the question, unintentionally of course.

I just like looking at all viewpoints. At #2, or #3 trading down sounds very intriguing, but as Chiefs fans we say that year in and year out.

I'd like to pick up another 2nd rounder, or maybe another first rounder like this past year.

Mecca · 12-23-2008, 08:34 PM

All I can say is if you decide the best players on your board are guys like Aaron Curry and Taylor Mays then you should try to trade out because the next best player is an OT.

aturnis · 12-23-2008, 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv

It's not hard to do. They just have to say something good about the team.

rep!

Ceej · 12-23-2008, 08:35 PM

Is taking an OT really that bad?

Anyone but MacIntosh please.

If Stafford has been picked and we do not trade down, would you go OT?

Mecca · 12-23-2008, 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJizzles

Is taking an OT really that bad?

Anyone but MacIntosh please.

If Stafford has been picked and we do not trade down, would you go OT?

If you take a OT that high, he has to play LT or you burned that pick then you have to move Albert after he's had a good season....and then where are you moving him to?

bowener · 12-23-2008, 08:38 PM

Following from what Mecca was saying about Detroit taking the Miami approach for next year, should we continue to assume that they will draft a QB?

I know Drew Stanton isn't the answer for them, but if they bring in a Vet and teach him up he can be a backup to their QBOTF while the Vet tries to win games for them.

Don't forget that they have a low 20's pick that they get from Dallas' dumb ass.

The Lions are abysmal and need talent everywhere, so is it inconceivable that they go for Andre Smith with their 1st overall pick? Then they will have a starting LT for a decade to come, as well as last years 1st rounder Gosder Cherilus who is playing RT for them. That would give them young bookend T's.

With their second 1st rounder, could the Lions go after a QB like Nate Davis (if he comes out after losing his coach)? Of course this pick depends greatly on the combine, but even if they don't they could go after a LB or DE here, and rely on the signed vet to play QB for the year.

If that happens, what happens to the draft board? The Rams wouldn't go for Stafford would they? Didn't they just pay Bulger a ton of money, and won't they try to draft a rookie LT to replace Orlando Pace? Or, if another team falls in love with Stafford and knows that we will most likely take him, will somebody try to jump up and take him?

Ceej · 12-23-2008, 08:38 PM

Why does he have to play LT?

Because that's our QB's blindside?

Why can you not take a RT at #2 or #3?

aturnis · 12-23-2008, 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJizzles

Is taking an OT really that bad?

Anyone but MacIntosh please.

If Stafford has been picked and we do not trade down, would you go OT?

We don't need a RT in the top 3. Poor value.

**luv** · 12-23-2008, 08:39 PM

One question about the BPA draft method. Do you always pick the BPA regardless of position? I mean, we do prioritize our needs, right?

Mecca · 12-23-2008, 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJizzles

Why does he have to play LT?

Because that's our QB's blindside?

Why can you not take a RT at #2 or #3?

It's really bad value...basically if you take a guy top 5 he has to play LT or it's a shit pick. He'd be one of the highest paid Olineman in football right away which means the only position he can play that makes it ok is LT.

Mecca · 12-23-2008, 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bowener

Following from what Mecca was saying about Detroit taking the Miami approach for next year, should we continue to assume that they will draft a QB?

I know Drew Stanton isn't the answer for them, but if they bring in a Vet and teach him up he can be a backup to their QBOTF while the Vet tries to win games for them.

Don't forget that they have a low 20's pick that they get from Dallas' dumb ass.

The Lions are abysmal and need talent everywhere, so is it inconceivable that they go for Andre Smith with their 1st overall pick? Then they will have a starting LT for a decade to come, as well as last years 1st rounder Gosder Cherilus who is playing RT for them. That would give them young bookend T's.

With their second 1st rounder, could the Lions go after a QB like Nate Davis (if he comes out after losing his coach)? Of course this pick depends greatly on the combine, but even if they don't they could go after a LB or DE here, and rely on the signed vet to play QB for the year.

If that happens, what happens to the draft board? The Rams wouldn't go for Stafford would they? Didn't they just pay Bulger a ton of money, and won't they try to draft a rookie LT to replace Orlando Pace? Or, if another team falls in love with Stafford and knows that we will most likely take him, will somebody try to jump up and take him?

From what I understand the Rams wanted Jake Long in the worst way last year so OT is not out of the question for them.

RustShack · 12-23-2008, 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJizzles

Why does he have to play LT?

Because that's our QB's blindside?

Why can you not take a RT at #2 or #3?

Because you can draft really good RT's outside the first round... and why would you invest more in your RT spot than your LT spot?

Pasta Little Brioni · 12-23-2008, 08:42 PM

Alot of teams get thier mauller, run blocker right tackle in the later rounds that is another reason it can be considered crazy to take one that high.

Mecca · 12-23-2008, 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv

One question about the BPA draft method. Do you always pick the BPA regardless of position? I mean, we do prioritize our needs, right?

Well I'd hope so there are such things as positional value and value to certain teams.

Like a franchise QB isn't goin to be valued by the Colts.

12-23-2008, 05:34 PM
Mecca Hockey Town Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Kansas City, Missouri Casino cash: $-662950	Ha Teicher is one of the funniest dudes ever.. So I flip on 610...This is what I hear him saying.. From talking to people out there with having the 2nd or 3rd pick, I think they'll take a QB, they've been talking that it's time to do that. Big mistake, they need an end, some LB's and some OL. And he just goes on about how they need those things far more than QB... Adam Teicher a true fan bitching about the Chiefs coming to terms with using a high pick on a QB.
Posts: 115,346

12-23-2008, 08:33 PM	#122
Ceej BOOM!1! Join Date: Aug 2004 Casino cash: $6605541	Haha, then quit dodging the question, unintentionally of course. I just like looking at all viewpoints. At #2, or #3 trading down sounds very intriguing, but as Chiefs fans we say that year in and year out. I'd like to pick up another 2nd rounder, or maybe another first rounder like this past year.
Posts: 19,230

12-23-2008, 08:34 PM	#123
Mecca Hockey Town Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Kansas City, Missouri Casino cash: $-662950	All I can say is if you decide the best players on your board are guys like Aaron Curry and Taylor Mays then you should try to trade out because the next best player is an OT.
Posts: 115,346

12-23-2008, 08:35 PM	#125
Ceej BOOM!1! Join Date: Aug 2004 Casino cash: $6605541	Is taking an OT really that bad? Anyone but MacIntosh please. If Stafford has been picked and we do not trade down, would you go OT?
Posts: 19,230

12-23-2008, 08:38 PM	#127
bowener BAMF! Join Date: Nov 2007 Casino cash: $9549897	Following from what Mecca was saying about Detroit taking the Miami approach for next year, should we continue to assume that they will draft a QB? I know Drew Stanton isn't the answer for them, but if they bring in a Vet and teach him up he can be a backup to their QBOTF while the Vet tries to win games for them. Don't forget that they have a low 20's pick that they get from Dallas' dumb ass. The Lions are abysmal and need talent everywhere, so is it inconceivable that they go for Andre Smith with their 1st overall pick? Then they will have a starting LT for a decade to come, as well as last years 1st rounder Gosder Cherilus who is playing RT for them. That would give them young bookend T's. With their second 1st rounder, could the Lions go after a QB like Nate Davis (if he comes out after losing his coach)? Of course this pick depends greatly on the combine, but even if they don't they could go after a LB or DE here, and rely on the signed vet to play QB for the year. If that happens, what happens to the draft board? The Rams wouldn't go for Stafford would they? Didn't they just pay Bulger a ton of money, and won't they try to draft a rookie LT to replace Orlando Pace? Or, if another team falls in love with Stafford and knows that we will most likely take him, will somebody try to jump up and take him? __________________ Main Entry: bowe·ner Pronunciation: \ˈbō-nər\ Function: noun Date: circa 2007
Posts: 8,358

12-23-2008, 08:38 PM	#128
Ceej BOOM!1! Join Date: Aug 2004 Casino cash: $6605541	Why does he have to play LT? Because that's our QB's blindside? Why can you not take a RT at #2 or #3?
Posts: 19,230

12-23-2008, 08:39 PM	#130
luv You think you can get by this? Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Springfield, MO Casino cash: $-1240000	One question about the BPA draft method. Do you always pick the BPA regardless of position? I mean, we do prioritize our needs, right?
Posts: 63,563

12-23-2008, 08:42 PM	#134
Pasta Little Brioni Consuming CP souls Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: U.S.A. Casino cash: $218880	Alot of teams get thier mauller, run blocker right tackle in the later rounds that is another reason it can be considered crazy to take one that high.
Posts: 72,991