Chiefs Weird rumor about the Chiefs getting Seymour - Page 7

JD10367 · 09-07-2009, 01:57 PM

Found this on Patsfans.com, don't know where it came from, but it would be f**king hilarious...

http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-...done-deal.html

Post #5:

They're saying that Seymour could end up going to KC for their 2010 #2, without saying more about what is written there it sounds like the Patriots could probably fall back on that if they wanted and the assumption (by me) is it depends if they want to do that or push the Raider deal, presumably with the 5 day letter which would leave Seymour little choice but to report.

tk13 · 09-07-2009, 07:50 PM

This isn't going to happen, but that doesn't mean I'd turn it down. We are not good enough to be not be looking to upgrade at almost any position. Yeah we need a new right side of the O-line but that wouldn't keep me from acquiring talent elsewhere if the right opportunity presents itself. This team is not good enough for that.

And I mentioned it in another thread, but even though we're in a 3-4 the Patriots guys obviously value having talented guys across the defensive line. More so than the conventional 3-4 wisdom would have it anyway.

**Skip Towne** · 09-07-2009, 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers

The deal is not final until he or any player passes a physical in a trade

He will be a Raider, you Chief fans ned to quit dreaming.....Your owner would never shell out the coin needed for a player of this caliber

You ned to shut the **** up.

R8RFAN · 09-07-2009, 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skip Towne

You ned to shut the **** up.

Don't you have a meth lab to tend to? WTF are you doing here? My name is not ned either...

Sweet Daddy Hate · 09-07-2009, 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers

Don't you have a meth lab to tend to? WTF are you doing here? My name is not ned either...

Die.

SDChief · 09-07-2009, 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers

The deal is not final until he or any player passes a physical in a trade

He will be a Raider, you Chief fans ned to quit dreaming.....Your owner would never shell out the coin needed for a player of this caliber

how does it feel to support a team so bad that players won't even report when traded. Commitment to Excrement

CaliforniaChief · 09-07-2009, 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers

The deal is not final until he or any player passes a physical in a trade

He will be a Raider, you Chief fans ned to quit dreaming.....Your owner would never shell out the coin needed for a player of this caliber

Let's follow the logic, here. The Cable Guy says it's being held up by issues with the Patriots and said player. You're saying the deal is not final until said player passes a physical in a trade. So you're saying the thing that's holding this up is Seymour taking a physical for the Patriots so that the Raiders can have him?

Oh and by the way, "owner smack" when it comes to anything related to Al Davis is an automatic loss for you before it even starts.

Sweet Daddy Hate · 09-07-2009, 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief

Oh and by the way, "owner smack" when it comes to anything related to Al Davis is an automatic loss for you before it even starts.

**Skip Towne** · 09-07-2009, 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers

Don't you have a meth lab to tend to? WTF are you doing here? My name is not ned either...

Read your post. I was making fun of your misspelling

bh13 · 09-07-2009, 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers

He will be a Raider, you Chief fans ned to quit dreaming.....Your owner would never shell out the coin needed for a player of this caliber

You're right. Clark needs to learn from Al Davis and trade a 2nd and a 5th round pick to get Seymour, sign him to a 7 year deal, then cut him 8 games into the season like Al Davis did with DeAngelo Hall.

CaliforniaChief · 09-07-2009, 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bh13

You're right. Clark needs to learn from Al Davis and trade a 2nd and a 5th round pick to get Seymour, sign him to a 7 year deal, then cut him 8 games into the season like Al Davis did with DeAngelo Hall.

Nice launch!

salame · 09-07-2009, 11:27 PM

undead al would be furious

**CrazyPhuD** · 09-07-2009, 11:48 PM

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...TL&type=sports

Seymour still has failed to report....it would still be the dumbest of all dumb moves to trade a 2nd for him. There is no chance and there never will be a chance that he will ever sign with the chiefs long term. It's simple there are 28 teams better than us, many of them will be able to offer exactly the same money than us and he will go to a contender that can offer him enough money. Why? Because quite simply by the time we are ready to contend on a consistent basis, he will no longer be in the league... It would be silly for him to play here, for the same reason it is silly for TG to play here. By the time we are ready to contend again, they will both be done.

Dante84 · 09-07-2009, 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrazyPhuD

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...TL&type=sports

Seymour still has failed to report....it would still be the dumbest of all dumb moves to trade a 2nd for him. There is no chance and there never will be a chance that he will ever sign with the chiefs long term. It's simple there are 28 teams better than us, many of them will be able to offer exactly the same money than us and he will go to a contender that can offer him enough money. Why? Because quite simply by the time we are ready to contend on a consistent basis, he will no longer be in the league... It would be silly for him to play here, for the same reason it is silly for TG to play here. By the time we are ready to contend again, they will both be done.

He has a ring. TG didn't. Big difference.

Dante84 · 09-07-2009, 11:51 PM

And FTR, I dont think it will happen at all. I'm just saying, that reasoning doesn't hold much water; at least how you framed it.

**CrazyPhuD** · 09-07-2009, 11:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dante84

And FTR, I dont think it will happen at all. I'm just saying, that reasoning doesn't hold much water; at least how you framed it.

Why you think any vet would play with a losing team, when they can get paid similar money to play with a team that winning? That just doesn't happen, not unless you team is in, NY or LA. Sorry hate to say it no matter how we get him there is no chance we're singing him next year. Especially considering next year is uncapped. Dude is going to dallas, or NYG, or even Wash, and there's really no where else he's going, with an uncapped year those will offer him the most.

09-07-2009, 01:57 PM
JD10367 Cheaterlover* Join Date: May 2009 Location: RI Casino cash: $10010716	Weird rumor about the Chiefs getting Seymour Found this on Patsfans.com, don't know where it came from, but it would be f**king hilarious... http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-...done-deal.html Post #5: They're saying that Seymour could end up going to KC for their 2010 #2, without saying more about what is written there it sounds like the Patriots could probably fall back on that if they wanted and the assumption (by me) is it depends if they want to do that or push the Raider deal, presumably with the 5 day letter which would leave Seymour little choice but to report.
Posts: 12,916

09-07-2009, 07:50 PM	#91
tk13 ... Join Date: Nov 2001 Casino cash: $-1697500	This isn't going to happen, but that doesn't mean I'd turn it down. We are not good enough to be not be looking to upgrade at almost any position. Yeah we need a new right side of the O-line but that wouldn't keep me from acquiring talent elsewhere if the right opportunity presents itself. This team is not good enough for that. And I mentioned it in another thread, but even though we're in a 3-4 the Patriots guys obviously value having talented guys across the defensive line. More so than the conventional 3-4 wisdom would have it anyway.
Posts: 56,621

09-07-2009, 11:27 PM	#101
salame Under the Sofa Join Date: Apr 2009 Casino cash: $10010607	undead al would be furious
Posts: 4,907

09-07-2009, 11:48 PM	#102
CrazyPhuD Meow Join Date: Jun 2005 Casino cash: $10005050	http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...TL&type=sports Seymour still has failed to report....it would still be the dumbest of all dumb moves to trade a 2nd for him. There is no chance and there never will be a chance that he will ever sign with the chiefs long term. It's simple there are 28 teams better than us, many of them will be able to offer exactly the same money than us and he will go to a contender that can offer him enough money. Why? Because quite simply by the time we are ready to contend on a consistent basis, he will no longer be in the league... It would be silly for him to play here, for the same reason it is silly for TG to play here. By the time we are ready to contend again, they will both be done. __________________ "Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t*rd by the clean end"
Posts: 8,523

09-07-2009, 11:51 PM	#104
Dante84 Tossed Salad & Scrambled Eggs Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: ATX & OPKS Casino cash: $-1868004 VARSITY	And FTR, I dont think it will happen at all. I'm just saying, that reasoning doesn't hold much water; at least how you framed it.
Posts: 20,447