Other Sports Did anyone just see the St. Johns vs Rutgers game? - Page 2

**Buck** · 03-09-2011, 03:40 PM

The fix was in, obviously.

**Buck** · 03-09-2011, 04:23 PM

Apparently the O/U was 128.5 and the final score was 65-63 which is 128.

Garcia Bronco · 03-09-2011, 04:25 PM

I don't see a foul. I do see the dipshit from St Johns run OOB's before the clock expired with the ball with about 1 second left on the clock

KC_Connection · 03-09-2011, 04:25 PM

It was a failure on the Rutgers coach's part for not even noticing what happened. If he had, though, I'm not sure whether it would have made any difference.

KC_Connection · 03-09-2011, 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco

I don't see a foul. I do see the dipshit from St Johns run OOB's before the clock expired with the ball with about 1 second left on the clock

There were two fouls the two previous possessions that weren't called.

**Buck** · 03-09-2011, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco

I don't see a foul. I do see the dipshit from St Johns run OOB's before the clock expired with the ball with about 1 second left on the clock

Its not in that vid. If you watch the last 10 seconds or so of game time then you'll see the 2 uncalled fouls.

DJ's left nut · 03-09-2011, 04:29 PM

Bad call but ultimately - I don't care.

A) Rutgers probably still doesn't hit the shot.

B) Even if they do, we're talking about the 13 seed in a loaded Big East tournament advancing to the quarters so they can get mauled by whoever the play.

Yeah, it was a bad call, but in the grand scheme of things, it just doesn't matter.

**Buck** · 03-09-2011, 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

Bad call but ultimately - I don't care.

A) Rutgers probably still doesn't hit the shot.

B) Even if they do, we're talking about the 13 seed in a loaded Big East tournament advancing to the quarters so they can get mauled by whoever the play.

Yeah, it was a bad call, but in the grand scheme of things, it just doesn't matter.

A) Rutgers should have had about 4 free throws on uncalled fouls

B) Technically throwing the ball into the stands is a Technical so they should have got 2 more free throws and the ball back

C) Had Rutgers won this game and one more they would be eligible for the NIT.

KC_Connection · 03-09-2011, 04:33 PM

Buck is right, Rutgers should have won that game for all of those reasons.

WebGem · 03-09-2011, 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck

Apparently the O/U was 128.5 and the final score was 65-63 which is 128.

This.

I saw it on twitter on the drive home.

**mikeyis4dcats.** · 03-09-2011, 04:39 PM

the clock on screen is not the official game clock, but generally there isn't THAT much difference, and the horn hadn't sounded.

Screw job.

DJ's left nut · 03-09-2011, 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck

A) Rutgers should have had about 4 free throws on uncalled fouls

B) Technically throwing the ball into the stands is a Technical so they should have got 2 more free throws and the ball back

C) Had Rutgers won this game and one more they would be eligible for the NIT.

Oh c'mon - uncalled fouls happen on every other possession. That hardly makes for a travesty. Nobody would've said a thing about uncalled fouls had the screwup at the very end not happened. There damn sure wouldn't be a thread around here on it.

And throwing the ball into the stands gets called as a technical about once a year. The fact that a kid thought the game was over and slung one out of bounds clearly doesn't qualify. Further, all technicals are at a ref's discretion and if there's no intent behind the act, the technical isn't appropriate.

Had Rutgers hit a miracle 3, they'd have won. That's it - the fouls are what they are, I'm sure there were uncalled fouls in favor of Rutgers previously. I'm not going to get up in arms about them. And even if Rutgers hits the shot, do you honestly think they were going to beat Pitt?

It's much ado about nothing. Bad call, but ultimately inconsequential. I'd be furious were I a fan of Rutgers, but I'm not - so I don't care.

**Buck** · 03-09-2011, 04:41 PM

The Big East put out a statement saying that neither the Travel nor the Step out of bounds are reviewable or correctable under NCAA playing rules.

DJ's left nut · 03-09-2011, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection

Buck is right, Rutgers should have won that game for all of those reasons.

Rutgers should have had a chance to launch a 3-point heave as time expired. That's it.

**Buck** · 03-09-2011, 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

Oh c'mon - uncalled fouls happen on every other possession. That hardly makes for a travesty. Nobody would've said a thing about uncalled fouls had the screwup at the very end not happened. There damn sure wouldn't be a thread around here on it.

And throwing the ball into the stands gets called as a technical about once a year. The fact that a kid thought the game was over and slung one out of bounds clearly doesn't qualify. Further, all technicals are at a ref's discretion and if there's no intent behind the act, the technical isn't appropriate.

Had Rutgers hit a miracle 3, they'd have won. That's it - the fouls are what they are, I'm sure there were uncalled fouls in favor of Rutgers previously. I'm not going to get up in arms about them. And even if Rutgers hits the shot, do you honestly think they were going to beat Pitt?

It's much ado about nothing. Bad call, but ultimately inconsequential. I'd be furious were I a fan of Rutgers, but I'm not - so I don't care.

I care about the integrity of the game, not whether either team has a chance at winning the championship. If that was the case then the NFL should just crown the Steelers or Pats at the beginning of every year.

WebGem · 03-09-2011, 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck

The Big East put out a statement saying that neither the Travel nor the Step out of bounds ARE NOT reviewable or correctable under NCAA playing rules.

Neither of them are not reviewable? So they should have been reviewed? Or did they say that neither of them are reviewable?

03-09-2011, 03:40 PM
Buck Take a Chill Pill Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: South Carolina Casino cash: $6160295	Did anyone just see the St. Johns vs Rutgers game? The fix was in, obviously.
Posts: 44,605

03-09-2011, 04:23 PM	#16
Buck Take a Chill Pill Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: South Carolina Casino cash: $6160295	Apparently the O/U was 128.5 and the final score was 65-63 which is 128.
Posts: 44,605

03-09-2011, 04:25 PM	#17
Garcia Bronco No Keys, No Problem Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: Denver Casino cash: $1843136	I don't see a foul. I do see the dipshit from St Johns run OOB's before the clock expired with the ball with about 1 second left on the clock
Posts: 32,834

03-09-2011, 04:25 PM	#18
KC_Connection Perpetual Mediocrity Join Date: Jan 2006 Casino cash: $1712783	It was a failure on the Rutgers coach's part for not even noticing what happened. If he had, though, I'm not sure whether it would have made any difference.
Posts: 57,699

03-09-2011, 04:29 PM	#21
DJ's left nut Sauntering Vaguely Downwards Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Columbia, Mo Casino cash: $-670901	Bad call but ultimately - I don't care. A) Rutgers probably still doesn't hit the shot. B) Even if they do, we're talking about the 13 seed in a loaded Big East tournament advancing to the quarters so they can get mauled by whoever the play. Yeah, it was a bad call, but in the grand scheme of things, it just doesn't matter. __________________ "If there's a god, he's laughing at us.....and our football team..." "When you look at something through rose colored glasses, all the red flags just look like flags."
Posts: 66,739

03-09-2011, 04:33 PM	#23
KC_Connection Perpetual Mediocrity Join Date: Jan 2006 Casino cash: $1712783	Buck is right, Rutgers should have won that game for all of those reasons.
Posts: 57,699

03-09-2011, 04:39 PM	#25
mikeyis4dcats. Scarlett Johansson's boytoy Join Date: Nov 2006 Casino cash: $9555998	the clock on screen is not the official game clock, but generally there isn't THAT much difference, and the horn hadn't sounded. Screw job.
Posts: 12,526

03-09-2011, 04:41 PM	#27
Buck Take a Chill Pill Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: South Carolina Casino cash: $6160295	The Big East put out a statement saying that neither the Travel nor the Step out of bounds are reviewable or correctable under NCAA playing rules.
Posts: 44,605