Other Sports Did anyone just see the St. Johns vs Rutgers game?

KC_Connection · 03-09-2011, 04:33 PM

Buck is right, Rutgers should have won that game for all of those reasons.

DJ's left nut · 03-09-2011, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection

Buck is right, Rutgers should have won that game for all of those reasons.

Rutgers should have had a chance to launch a 3-point heave as time expired. That's it.

KC_Connection · 03-09-2011, 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

Rutgers should have had a chance to launch a 3-point heave as time expired. That's it.

Even if you ignore everything that went on before that call, that's still a 30-40% chance at victory that they lost on poor officiating.

DJ's left nut · 03-09-2011, 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection

Even if you ignore everything that went on before that call, that's still a 30-40% chance at victory that they lost on poor officiating.

They had a 30% chance to knock down a 3 pointer with 1.7 seconds left on the clock?

How often do those shots actually fall? 1 time in 10? Probably not even that - the rushed 3 point shot as time expires isn't exactly a gimme.

What world do you live in again?

**mikeyis4dcats.** · 03-09-2011, 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

They had a 30% chance to knock down a 3 pointer with 1.7 seconds left on the clock?

How often do those shots actually fall? 1 time in 10? Probably not even that - the rushed 3 point shot as time expires isn't exactly a gimme.

What world do you live in again?

at least he doesn't live in the world of "it's not a gimme, so they shouldn
t even have a chance to do it".

KC_Connection · 03-09-2011, 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

They had a 30% chance to knock down a 3 pointer with 1.7 seconds left on the clock?

The exact percentage depends entirely on the quality of the shot they are able to get, but they have plenty of 30-40% shooters from three.

Of course, we'll never know what they would have done now because poor officiating cost them their season.

**Saul Good** · 03-09-2011, 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

They had a 30% chance to knock down a 3 pointer with 1.7 seconds left on the clock?

How often do those shots actually fall? 1 time in 10? Probably not even that - the rushed 3 point shot as time expires isn't exactly a gimme.

What world do you live in again?

They were down 2.

**BigMeatballDave** · 03-09-2011, 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

They had a 30% chance to knock down a 3 pointer with 1.7 seconds left on the clock?

How often do those shots actually fall? 1 time in 10? Probably not even that - the rushed 3 point shot as time expires isn't exactly a gimme.

What world do you live in again?

They only needed 2 to tie. The Refs ****ed up. There is no debate here.

Al Bundy · 03-10-2011, 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

They had a 30% chance to knock down a 3 pointer with 1.7 seconds left on the clock?

How often do those shots actually fall? 1 time in 10? Probably not even that - the rushed 3 point shot as time expires isn't exactly a gimme.

What world do you live in again?

Actually if correctly called they would have gotten the ball after a technical foul shot.

03-09-2011, 04:33 PM	#1
KC_Connection Perpetual Mediocrity Join Date: Jan 2006 Casino cash: $1712783	Buck is right, Rutgers should have won that game for all of those reasons.
Posts: 57,697