Football AFCWest - Back to being dominant

Mile High Mania · 07-09-2010, 12:53 PM

So, we've all sat around for much of the last decade watching the teams of the AFCW disappoint us from a "consistently being competitive" point of view. Sure, we all like to see the other teams suck... but, really I enjoy it when each team is very competitive and the games are great.

Is 2010 the year that we'll finally see the four teams battling at .500 or greater, rather than 1 and maybe 2 teams only topping the .500 mark?

Right now, I'd have to say we're looking at another 2009 ... with the teams being slightly improved, but really only SD is a legit potential for 10 or more wins. The other three would love to be at .500 or 9 wins and even then, I'm not sure .500 or 9 wins means they're contending to win a playoff game.

How much longer do we have to wait for the AFCW as a whole to become dominant?

07-09-2010, 12:53 PM	Topic Starter
Mile High Mania #triggering Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Tejas Casino cash: $3377229	AFCWest - Back to being dominant So, we've all sat around for much of the last decade watching the teams of the AFCW disappoint us from a "consistently being competitive" point of view. Sure, we all like to see the other teams suck... but, really I enjoy it when each team is very competitive and the games are great. Is 2010 the year that we'll finally see the four teams battling at .500 or greater, rather than 1 and maybe 2 teams only topping the .500 mark? Right now, I'd have to say we're looking at another 2009 ... with the teams being slightly improved, but really only SD is a legit potential for 10 or more wins. The other three would love to be at .500 or 9 wins and even then, I'm not sure .500 or 9 wins means they're contending to win a playoff game. How much longer do we have to wait for the AFCW as a whole to become dominant?
Posts: 30,353