|
|
View Poll Results: Read the OP | |||
Legit excuse. He should definitely be given another year. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 1.43% |
Somewhat legit. Maybe he should be given another year. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 5.71% |
Somewhat legit. But not enough to keep him. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
18 | 25.71% |
Not an excuse. He needs to go. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
47 | 67.14% |
Voters: 70. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
Topic Starter |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2001
Casino cash: $10004900
|
I was originally gonna post this in the "Cassel Sucks" thread, but...
... I want to focus on this one aspect of the Cassel problem. If you want to post a general "Cassel sucks" reaction, please post it in that other thread. If this thread is gonna be otherwise short, so be it. Less just focus on this:
I, like many of you, have the opinion that the Cassel experiment should be over. That said though, the only argument on his behalf that I cannot shake is the one about him, under the old system, receiving the plays with only a few seconds to implement them. I can see that can rattle a QB, leading to inability to read the D efficiently, general loss of poise, and inaccuracy. How much of this is, IYO, a legit argument? If it actually is a legit argument, then should the Chiefs not give the guy one more season to prove himself? Tell you what, I'm gonna make this into a poll. Be honest about your vote and don't let your bias vote for you. Last edited by Frankie; 01-13-2012 at 12:02 AM.. |
Posts: 26,959
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
|